In this article, we present the benefits of blending the methodological characteristics of the focused ethnographic method (FEM) and case study research (CSR) for a study on auxiliary work processes in a hospital in Barcelona, Spain. We argue that incorporating CSR logic and principles in the FEM produces a better form of inquiry, as this combination improves the quality of data and the ability to make comparisons in addition to enhancing the transferability of findings. These better outcomes are achieved because the characteristics of the case study methodological design reinforce many of the strengths of the FEM, such as its thematic concreteness and its targeted data collection. The role played by the theoretical framework of the study thus makes it easier to focus on the key variables of the initial theoretical model and to introduce a logic of multiple case comparison.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BernardH. R.2011. Research methods in anthropology, 5th ed. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
2.
BikkerA. P.AthertonH.BrantH.PorquedduT.CampbellJ. L.GibsonA.McKinstryB.SalisburyC.ZieblandS.. 2017. Conducting a team-based multi-sited focused ethnography in primary care. BMC Medical Research Methodology17:139.
3.
CicourelA. V.2002. La gestion des rendez-vous dans un service médical spécialisé. Organisation et communication en régime de “surcharge” cognitive [Managing appointments in a specialized medical service. Organization and communication in a cognitive “overload” regime]. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales147:3–17.
4.
CreswellJ. W.2009. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
CruzE. V.HigginbottomG.. 2013. The use of focused ethnography in nursing research. Nurse Researcher20:36–43.
6.
DurandJ. P.2001. Travail informationnel et flux tendu [Informational work and tight flow]. In Temps de travail et temps libre, eds. DurandC.PichonA., 99–112. Brussels: De Boeck.
7.
EisenhardtK.1989. Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review14:532–50.
8.
FuschP. I.FuschG. E.NessL. R.. 2017. How to conduct a mini-ethnographic case study. The Qualitative Report22:923–41.
9.
GeorgeA. L.BennettA.. 2005. Case studies and theory development. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
10.
GerringJ.2007. Case study research. Principles and practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
GoveS.PeltoG. H.. 1994. Focused ethnographic studies in the WHO programme for the control of acute respiratory infections. Medical Anthropology15:409–24.
12.
HalesK.CoombsM.de VriesK.. 2018. The challenges in caring for morbidly obese patients in intensive care: A focused ethnographic study. Australian Critical Care31:37–41.
13.
HancockB. H.SykesB. L.VermaA.. 2018. The problem of “cameo appearances” in mixed-methods research: Implications for twenty-first-century ethnography. Sociological Perspectives61:314–34.
14.
HandwerkerW. P.2001. Quick ethnography: A guide to rapid multi-method research. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
15.
HandwerkerW. P.WozniakF. D.. 1997. Sampling strategies for the collection of cultural data: An extension of Boas’s answer to Galton’s problem. Current Anthropology38:869–75.
16.
HigginbottomG. M. A.PillayJ. J.BoaduN. Y.. 2013. Guidance on performing focused ethnographies with an emphasis on health care research. The Qualitative Report18:1–16.
17.
HutchinsE.1995. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
18.
JensonJ.1989. The talents of women, the skills of men: Flexible specialization and women. In The transformation of work? Skill, flexibility and the labour process, ed. WoodS., 141–55. London: Unwin Hyman.
19.
KnoblauchH. 2005. Focused ethnography. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research6:Article 44.
20.
LeeJ.PeltoG. H.HabichtJ. P.BhuiyanM. M. I.JalalC. S.. 2019. Identifying nutrition and health-relevant behaviors, beliefs, and values of school-going adolescent girls in rural Bangladesh: Context for interventions. Current Developments in Nutrition3:nzz013.
21.
LeiningerM. M.1985. Qualitative research methods in nursing. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
22.
LichtenbergerY.2003. Compétence, compétences [Competency, competencies]. In Encyclopédie des ressources humaines, coordinated by AllouchéJ., 203–15. Paris: Éditions Vuibert.
23.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G.. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24.
LozaresC.VerdJ. M.BarrancoO.MorenoS.MassóM.. 2013. La complejidad y opacidad de las tareas auxiliares en los procesos de trabajo: Un análisis etnográfico comparado en dos servicios hospitalarios [The complexity and opacity of auxiliary tasks in work processes: A comparative ethnographic analysis in two hospital services]. Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales31:221–42.
25.
LuffP.HindmarshJ.HeathC., eds. 2000. Workplace studies. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
26.
MaxwellJ. A.ChmielM.. 2014. Generalization in and from qualitative analysis. In The Sage handbook of qualitative analysis, ed. FlickW., 540–53. Los Angeles: Sage.
27.
MayR. A. B.Pattillo-McCoyM.. 2000. Do you see what I see? Examining a collaborative ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry6:65–87.
28.
MeyerC. B.2001. A case in case study methodology. Field Methods13:329–52.
29.
MueckeM. A.1994. On the evaluation of ethnographies. In Critical issues in qualitative research methods, ed. MorseJ. M., 187–209. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Parker-JenkinsM.2018. Problematising ethnography and case study: Reflections on using ethnographic techniques and researcher positioning. Ethnography and Education13:18–33.
31.
PeltoG. H.2017. Ethnography as a tool for formative research and evaluation. In Food health, eds. ChrzanJ.BrettJ., 54–70. New York: Berghahn.
32.
PeltoG. H.Armar-KlemesuM.SiekmannJ.SchofieldD.. 2013. The focused ethnographic study “assessing the behavioural and local market environment for improving the diets of infants and young children 6 to 23 months old” and its use in three countries. Maternal & Child Nutrition9:35–46.
33.
PeltoP. J.2016. Applied ethnography: Guidelines for field research. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
34.
ThuitaF. M.PeltoG. H.MusinguziE.Armar-KlemesuM.. 2018. Is there a “complementary feeding cultural core” in rural Kenya? Results from ethnographic research in five counties. Maternal & Child Nutrition15:e12671.
35.
VerdJ. M.BarrancoO.MorenoS.. 2007. El análisis de los procesos de trabajo mediante métodos etnográficos: el caso del trabajo administrativo de consultas externas hospitalarias [Analyzing work processes using ethnographic methods: the case of administrative work in Outpatients]. Papers. Revista de Sociología83:145–68.
36.
Vindrola-PadrosC.Vindrola-PadrosB.. 2018. Quick and dirty? A systematic review of the use of rapid ethnographies in health care organisation and delivery. BMJ Quality & Safety27:321–30.
37.
WallS. 2015. Focused ethnography: A methodological adaptation for social research in emerging contexts. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research16:Article 1.
38.
WolcottH. F.1990. Making a study “more ethnographic.”Journal of Contemporary Ethnography19:44–72.
39.
YinR. K.2012. Applications of case study research, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
YinR. K.2014. Case study research. Design and methods, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
