This article introduces ethnographic upscaling, an innovative procedure to explore and test hypotheses drawn from in-depth ethnographic findings in spatially continuous cases. The approach combines the strength of localized ethnographic descriptions with questionnaire-based regional surveys to study the distribution of ethnographic findings across social groups by comparison. The approach was designed in the Local Institutions in Globalized Societies project. This anthropological long-term research project ran from 2010 to 2019 to explore institutional regimes for managing water in arid Namibia. The article describes how the ethnographic upscaling approach was developed and implemented, discusses some exemplary results, and offers a critical reflection on its shortcomings and potentials.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BalandJ.-M.PlatteauJ.-P.. 1996. Halting degradation of natural resources: Is there a role for rural communities?Oxford: Clarendon Press.
2.
BernardH. R.2006. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Lanham, MD: AltaMira.
3.
BolligM.2006. Risk management in a hazardous environment. A comparative study of two pastoral societies. New York: Springer.
4.
BoothD. T.TuellerP. T.. 2003. Rangeland monitoring using remote sensing. Arid Land Research and Management17:455–67.
5.
BrettellC. B.2009. Anthropology, migration, and comparative consciousness. New Literary History40:649–71.
6.
BurawoyM.1998. The extended case method. Sociological Theory16:4–33.
7.
CleaverF.2012. Development through bricolage. London: Routledge.
8.
CleaverF.De KoningJ.. 2015. Furthering critical institutionalism. International Journal of the Commons9:1–18.
9.
GingrichA.2015. Comparative method in anthropology. In International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, ed. WrightJ. D., 411–14. Oxford: Elsevier.
10.
GingrichA.FoxR. G.. 2002. Anthropology, by comparison. London: Routledge.
11.
GreinerC.2008. Zwischen Ziegenkraal und township: Migrationsprozesse in Nordwestnamibia. Berlin: Reimer.
12.
HallK.CleaverF.FranksT.MagangaF.. 2014. Capturing critical institutionalism: A synthesis of key themes and debates. The European Journal of Development Research26:71–86.
13.
HandlerR.2009. The uses of incommensurability in anthropology. New Literary History40:627–47.
14.
HenrichJ. P.AlvardM.. 2004. Foundations of human sociality: Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
HeynsP.2005. Water institutional reforms in Namibia. Water Policy7:89–106.
16.
HirschJ. S.WardlowH.SmithD. J.. 2009. The secret: love, marriage, and HIV. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
17.
JarvisP. G.1995. Scaling processes and problems. Plant, Cell & Environment18:1079–89.
18.
KelbertT.2016. Encounters at the water-point—An ethnography of the travelling model of community-based water management and its application to rural water supply in Namibia. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
LinkeT.2017. Kooperation unter Unsicherheit—Institutionelle Reformen und kommunale Wassernutzung im Nordwesten Namibias. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript Verlag.
21.
McKeanM. A.1992. Success on the commons: A comparative examination of institutions for common property resource management. Journal of Theoretical Politics4:247–81.
22.
Menestrey SchwiegerD. A.2015. An ethnographic analysis of the role of power in institutional arrangements: Borehole cost recovery within a pastoral community in north-western Namibia. Environmental Policy and Governance25:258–69.
23.
Menestrey SchwiegerD. A.2017. The pump keeps on running: On the emergence of water management institutions between state decentralization and local practices in northern Kunene Vol. 36. Münster, Germany: Lit Verlag.
24.
Menestrey SchwiegerD. A.2019. Negotiating water on unequal terms: Cattle loans, dependencies and power in communal water management in northwest Namibia. Nomadic Peoples23:241–60.
25.
MertonR. K.2012. On sociological theories of the middle range (1949). In Classical sociological theory, eds. CalhounC.GerteisJ.MoodyJ.PfaffS.VirkI., 531–42. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
26.
OstromE.1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
27.
PalinkasL. A.HorwitzS. M.GreenC. A.WisdomJ. P.DuanN.HoagwoodK.. 2015. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research42:533–44.
28.
PauliJ.2008. Ethnographischer Zensus. In Methoden der ethnologischer Feldforschung, ed. BeerB.. 59–81. Berlin: Reimer.
29.
PauliJ.2009. (Re)producing an elite: Fertility, marriage and economic change in northwest Namibia. In Networks, resources and economic action: Ethnographic case studies in honour of Hartmut Lang, eds. KokotW.GreinerC., 303–25. Berlin: Reimer.
30.
PoteeteA. R.JanssenM.OstromE.. 2010. Working together: Collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
Republic of Namibia. 1999. Guidelines for the implementation of community based management and cost recovery for rural water supply. Windhoek, Namibia: Ministry of Agriculture Water and Rural Development.
32.
Republic of Namibia. 2004. Water Resources Management Act No. 24. Windhoek, Namibia: Republic of Namibia.
33.
RuttanL. M.2006. Sociocultural heterogeneity and the commons. Current Anthropology47:843–53.
34.
RuttanL. M.2008. Economic heterogeneity and the commons: Effects on collective action and collective goods provisioning. World Development36:969–85.
35.
SchefferT.NiewöhnerJ.. 2010. Thick comparison: Reviving the ethnographic aspiration, Vol. 114. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.
36.
SchlagerE.1994. Fishers’ institutional responses to common-pool resource dilemmas. In Rules, games, and common-pool resources, eds. OstromE.GardnerR.WelkerJ., 247–66. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
37.
SchneggM.2009. It’s the combination that counts: Diversification of pastoral livelihoods in northwestern Namibia. In Networks, resources and economic action: Ethnographic case studies in honour of Hartmunt Lang, eds. KokotW.GreinerC., 229–48. Berlin: Reimer.
38.
SchneggM.2014. Anthropology and comparison: Methodological challenges and tentative solutions. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie139:55–72.
39.
SchneggM.2016. Lost in translation: State policies and micro-politics of water governance in Namibia. Human Ecology44:245–55.
40.
SchneggM.2018. Institutional multiplexity: Social networks and community-based natural resource management. Sustainability Science13:1017–30.
41.
SchneggM.2019. The life of winds: Knowing the Namibian weather from someplace and from noplace. American Anthropologist121:830–44. doi: 10.1111/aman.13274.
42.
SchneggM.BolligM.LinkeT.. 2016. Moral equality and success of common-pool water governance in Namibia. AMBIO45:581–90.
43.
SchneggM.LinkeT.. 2015. Living institutions: Sharing and sanctioning water among pastoralists in Namibia. World Development68:205–14.
44.
SchneggM.LinkeT.. 2016. Travelling models of participation: Global ideas and local translations of water management in Namibia. International Journal of the Commons10:800–820.
45.
SchweizerT.1996. Muster sozialer Ordnung: Netzwerkanalyse als Fundament der Sozialethnologie. Berlin: Reimer.
46.
SchweizerT.WhiteD. R.. 1998. Kinship, networks, and exchange: Structural analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
47.
TangS. Y.1994. Institutions and performance in irrigation systems. In Rules, games, and common-pool resources, eds. OstromE.GardnerR.WalkerJ., 225–45. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
48.
TönsjostS.2013. Umverteilung und Egalität. Münster, Germany: Lit Verlag.
49.
Van der VeerP.2016. The value of comparison. Durham: Duke University Press.
50.
Van WolputteS.2007. Cattle works: Livestock policy, apartheid and development in northwest Namibia, c 1920–1980. African Studies66:103–28.
51.
WadeR.1994. Village republics: Economic conditions for collective action in South India. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
