Self-rated health (SRH) and subjective life expectancy (SLE) are widely used for understanding health and predicting mortality. However, what these items measure remains unclear, due to the lack of conceptual frameworks. We administered a web survey across the United States, Great Britain, Germany, Spain, and Mexico. The questionnaire included SRH and SLE, each immediately followed by a question that probed respondents’ thought processes. We examined the relationship between SRH and SLE, the response difficulty, and attributes that respondents considered for forming responses. Overall, SRH and SLE were moderately related, eliciting different information and varying in difficulty. Compared to SLE, SRH was perceived as easier but covered a narrower information spectrum. While illness and health behaviors were dominant attributes of SRH responses, family longevity history, life situations, and lack of control were additionally considered for SLE. When combined, SRH and SLE may capture a fuller range of attributes germane to health and mortality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbelesR.1991. Sense of control, quality of life, and frail older people. In The concept and measure of quality of life in the frail elderly, eds. BirrenJ.LubbenJ.RoweJ.DeutschmanD., 297–314. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
2.
BailisD. S.SegallA.ChipperfieldJ. G.. 2003. Two views of self-rated general health status. Social Science & Medicine56:203–17.
3.
BehrD.MeitingerK.BraunM.KaczmirekL.. 2017. Web probing—Implementing probing techniques from cognitive interviewing in web surveys with the goal to assess the validity of survey questions. GESIS—Survey Guidelines. Mannheim, Germany: GESIS—Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences.
4.
BergadaaM. M.1990. The role of time in the action of the consumer. Journal of Consumer Research17:289.
5.
de BresserJ.van SoestA.. 2019. The predictive power of subjective probabilities: Probabilistic and deterministic polling in the Dutch 2017 election. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society182:443–66.
6.
Bruine de BruinW.CarmanK. G.. 2018. Measuring subjective probabilities: The effect of response mode on the use of focal responses, validity, and respondents’ evaluations. Risk Analysis38:2128–43.
7.
CarterE. C.McCulloughM. E.Kim-SpoonJ.CorralesC.BlakeA.. 2012. Religious people discount the future less. Evolution and Human Behavior33:224–31.
8.
CouperM. P.TourangeauR.ConradF. G.SingerE.. 2006. Evaluating the effectiveness of visual analog scales. Social Science Computer Review24:227–45.
9.
DevlinN. J.BrooksR.. 2017. EQ-5D and the EuroQol group: Past, present and future. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy15:127–37.
10.
ElinsonJ.1994. Introductory remarks. In Proceedings of the 1993 NCHS Conference on the Cognitive Aspects of Self-Reported Health Status, ed. SchechterS., 2–5. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
11.
FerraroK. F.WilkinsonL. R.. 2015. Alternative measures of self-rated health for predicting mortality among older people: Is past or future orientation more important?The Gerontologist55:836–44.
12.
FienbergS. E.LoftusE. F.TanurJ. M.. 1985. Cognitive aspects of health survey methodology: An overview. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society63:547.
13.
GrahamR. J.1981. The role of perception of time in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research7:335.
14.
GriffinB.LohV.HeskethB.. 2013. A mental model of factors associated with subjective life expectancy. Social Science & Medicine82:79–86.
15.
GrovesR. M.FultzN. H.MartinE.. 1992. Direct questioning about comprehension in a survey setting. In Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys, eds. TanurJ. M., 49–61. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
16.
HennessyC. H.MoriartyD. G.ZackM. M.ScherrP. A.BrackbillR.. 1994. Measuring health-related quality of life for public health surveillance. Public Health Reports109:665–72.
17.
HongY.-Y.2009. A dynamic constructivist approach to culture: Moving from describing culture to explaining culturele. In Understanding culture: Theory, research, and application, eds. WyerY.ChiuR. S.HongC.-Y., 3–23. New York: Psychology Press.
18.
IdlerE. L.BenyaminiY.. 1997. Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior38:21–37.
19.
JohnsonT.O’RourkeD.ChavezN.SudmanS.WarneckeR.LaceyL.HormJ.. 1997. Social cognition and responses to survey questions among culturally diverse populations. In Survey measurement and process quality, eds. LybergL.BiemerP.CollinsM.De LeeuwE.DippoC.SchwarzN.TrewinD., 87–113. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
20.
JusterF. T.1964. Anticipations and purchases. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
JylhäM.2011. Self-rated health and subjective survival probabilities as predictors of mortality. In International handbook of adult mortality, eds. RogersR. G.CrimminsE. M., 329–44. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.
22.
KerryM. J.EmbretsonS. E.. 2018. An experimental evaluation of competing age-predictions of future time perspective between workplace and retirement domains. Frontiers in Psychology8:2316.
23.
LarsonJ. S.1999. The conceptualization of health. Medical Care Research and Review56:123–36.
24.
LeeS.2014. Self-rated health in health surveys. In Handbook of health survey methods, ed. JohnsonT. P., 193–216. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
25.
LeeS.KeuschF.SchwarzN.LiuM.Tuba Suzer-GurtekinZ.. 2018. Cross-cultural comparability of response patterns of subjective probability questions. In Advances in comparative survey method, eds. JohnsonT. P.PennellB.StoopI. A. L.DorerB., 455–75. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
26.
LeeS.LiuM.HuM.. 2017. Relationship between future time orientation and item nonresponse on subjective probability questions: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology48:698–717.
27.
LeeS.McClainC.WebsterN.HanS.. 2016. Question order sensitivity of subjective well-being measures: Focus on life satisfaction, self-rated health, and subjective life expectancy in survey instruments. Quality of Life Research25:2497–510.
28.
LeeS.SchwarzN.. 2014. Question context and priming meaning of health: Effect on differences in self-rated health between Hispanics and non-Hispanic Whites. American Journal of Public Health104:179–85.
29.
LeeS.SmithJ.. 2016. Methodological aspects of subjective life expectancy: Effects of culture-specific reporting heterogeneity among older adults in the United States. Journals of Gerontology—Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences71:558–68.
30.
ManskiC. F.1990. The use of intentions data to predict behavior: A best-case analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association85:934–40.
31.
MarkoK. WhanSavickasM. L.. 1998. Effectiveness of a career time perspective intervention. Journal of Vocational Behavior52:106–19.
32.
McCarthyM. C.RuizE.GaleB. J.KaramC.MooreN.. 2004. The meaning of health: Perspectives of Anglo and Latino older women. Health Care for Women International25:950–69.
33.
MirowskyJ.RossC. E.. 2000. Socioeconomic status and subjective life expectancy. Social Psychology Quarterly63:133.
34.
PerozekM.2008. Using subjective expectations to forecast longevity: Do survey respondents know something we don’t know?Demography45:95–113.
35.
SiegelM.BradleyE. H.KaslS. V.. 2003. Self-rated life expectancy as a predictor of mortality: Evidence from the HRS and AHEAD surveys. Gerontology49:265–71.
36.
StoneA. A.TurkkanJ. S.BachrachC. A.JobeJ. B.KurtzmanH. S.CainV. S., Eds. 2000. The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37.
van DoornC.KaslS. V.. 1998. Can parental longevity and self-rated life expectancy predict mortality among older persons? Results from an Australian cohort. The Journals of Gerontology—Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences53B: S28–34.
38.
World Health Organization. 2017. World health statistics 2016: Monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals. Geneva: World Health Organization.
39.
ZickC. D.SmithK. R.MayerR. N.TaylorL. B.. 2014. Family, frailty, and fatal futures? Own-health and family-health predictors of subjective life expectancy. Research on Aging36:244–66.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
