Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

As an aural mode, an interviewer’s voice is an important part of telephone surveys. A speaker’s voice can convey information about his or her trustworthiness and confidence, among other attributes. Consequently, respondents may perceive attributes of interviewers from their voices. We evaluated how five perceived attributes of interviewers (expertise, confidence, reliability, trustworthiness, and easiness to understand) are associated with interviewer voice characteristics (pitch, intonation, speech rate, and disfluencies) and whether this varies by types of question and interviewer characteristics. Overall, listeners perceived interviewers’ attributes from their voices. Interviewers with higher pitched voices, moderate intonation, a faster pace, and fewer disfluencies were rated more positively, but these ratings differed somewhat for socially undesirable and complex questions. Reading questions at the recommended speech rate of two words per second leads to negative perceptions of interviewers.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Association for Public Opinion Research. 2016. Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. http://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions20169theditionfinal.pdf (accessed June 17, 2017).

Apple

Streeter

L. A.

Krauss

R. M.

. 1979. Effects of pitch and speech rate on personal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37:715–27.

Bachorowski

J.-A.

1999. Vocal expression and perception of emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science 8:53–57.

Bänziger

Patel

Scherer

K. R.

. 2014. The role of perceived voice and speech characteristics in vocal emotion communication. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 38:31–52.

Bell

B. A.

Ene

Smiley

Schoeneberger

J. A.

. 2013. A multilevel model primer using SAS PROC MIXED. http://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings13/433-2013.pdf (accessed June 17, 2017).

Benkí

Broome

Conrad

Groves

Kreuter

. 2011. Effects of speech rate, pitch, and pausing on survey participation decisions. Paper presented at the American Association for Public Opinion Research Annual Meeting, Phoenix, AZ.

Boehme

2014. How trustworthy is your voice? The effects of voice manipulation on the perceived trustworthiness of novel speakers. Unpublished PhD diss., University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Boersma

Weenink

. 2010. {P}raat: Doing phonetics by computer. http://www.praat.org (accessed October 4, 2014).

Bortfeld

Leon

S. D.

Bloom

J. E.

Schober

M. F.

Brennan

S. E.

. 2001. Disfluency rates in conversation: Effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender. Language and Speech 44:123–47.

10.

Bradac

J. J.

Wisegarver

. 1984. Ascribed status, lexical diversity, and accent: Determinants of perceived status, solidarity, and control of speech style. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 3:239–55.

11.

Broome

J. S.

2012. Vocal characteristics, speech, and behavior of telephone interviewers. Unpublished PhD diss., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

12.

Cannell

C. F.

Miller

P. V.

Oksenberg

. 1981. Research on interviewing techniques. Sociological Methodology 12:389–437.

13.

Conrad

F. G.

Schober

M. F.

Dijkstra

. 2008. Cues of communication difficulty in telephone interviews. In Advances in telephone survey methodology, eds. Lepkowski

J. M.

Tucker

Brick

J. M.

de Leeuw

E. D.

Japec

Lavrakas

P. J.

Link

M. W.

Sangster

R. L.

, 212–30. New York: Wiley.

14.

Ehlen

Schober

M. F.

Conrad

F. G.

. 2007. Modeling speech disfluency to predict conceptual misalignment in speech survey interfaces. Discourse Processes 44:245–65.

15.

Gordon-Salant

Fitzgibbons

P. J.

Friedman

S. A.

. 2007. Recognition of time-compressed and natural speech with selective temporal enhancements by young and elderly listeners. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50:1181–93.

16.

Groves

R. M.

O’Hare

B. C.

Gould-Smith

Benki

Maher

. 2008. Telephone interviewer voice characteristics and the survey participation decision. In Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology, eds. Lepkowski

J. M.

Tucker

Brick

J. M.

de Leeuw

E. D.

Japec

Lavrakas

P. J.

Link

M. W.

Sangster

R. L.

, 385–400. New York: Wiley.

17.

Hoffman

2015. Longitudinal analysis: Modeling within-person fluctuation and change. New York: Routledge.

18.

Hovland

C. I.

Irving

K. J.

Harold

H. K.

.1953. Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

19.

Jans

M. E.

2010. Verbal paradata and survey error: Respondent speech voice, and question-answering behavior can predict income item nonresponse. Doctoral dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu (accessed June 5, 2017).

20.

Japec

2008. Interviewer error and interviewer burden. In Advances in telephone survey methodology, eds. Lepkowski

J. M.

Tucker

Brick

J. M.

de Leeuw

E. D.

Japec

Lavrakas

P. J.

Link

M. W.

Sangster

R. L.

, 185–211. New York: Wiley.

21.

Kent

R. D.

Read

. 2002. Acoustic analysis of speech, 2nd ed. Albany, NY: Thomson Learning.

22.

Ketrow

S. M.

1990. Attributes of a telemarketer’s voice and persuasiveness. A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Direct Marketing 4:7–21.

23.

Kiernan

Tobias

Gibbs

Tai

. 2011. CONTRAST and ESTIMATE statements made easy: The LSMESTIMTE statement. https://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings11/351-2011.pdf (accessed June 17, 2017).

24.

Miller

Maruyama

Beaber

R. J.

Valone

. 1976. Speed of speech and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34:615.

25.

Munro

2005. Statistical methods for health care research. London: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

26.

Oksenberg

Cannell

. 1988. Effects of interviewer vocal characteristics on nonresponse. In Telephone Survey Methodology, eds. Groves

R. M

Biemer

P. B.

Lyberg

L. E.

Massey

J. T.

Nichols

W. L.

II Waksberg

, 257–69. New York: Wiley.

27.

Olson

2010. An examination of questionnaire evaluation by expert reviewers. Field Methods 22:295–318.

28.

Olson

Peytchev

. 2007. Effect of interviewer experience on interview pace and interviewer attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly 71:273–86.

29.

Rabe-Hesketh

Skrondal

. 2012. Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.

30.

Scherer

K. R.

London

Wolf

J. J.

. 1973. The voice of confidence: Paralinguistic cues and audience evaluation. Journal of Research in Personality 7:31–34.

31.

Smith

S. M.

Shaffer

D. R.

. 1995. Speed of speech and persuasion: Evidence for multiple effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21:1051–60.

32.

Tauroza

Allison

. 1990. Speech rates in British English. Applied Linguistics 11:90–105.

33.

Van der Vaart

Ongena

Hoogendoorn

Dijkstra

. 2005. Do interviewers’ voice characteristics influence cooperation rates in telephone surveys? International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18:488–99.

34.

Webb

J. T.

1969. Subject speech rates as a function of interviewer behaviour. Language and Speech 12:54–67.

35.

Yuan

Liberman

Cieri

. 2006. Towards an integrated understanding of speaking rate in conversation. In Proceedings of INTERSPEECH 2006, 541–44. Grenoble: International Speech Communication Association. http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/myl/ldc/llog/icslp06_final.pdf (accessed June 20, 2017).

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.35 MB

Do Listeners Perceive Interviewers’ Attributes from their Voices and Do Perceptions Differ by Question Type?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material