Abstract
Behavior coding is used to detect issues in questionnaires by flagging interactions between survey respondents and interviewers when their interactions deviate from standardized interviewing. It has become a popular method for evaluating survey questionnaire quality and has been used mostly in Western countries, with little research being done in Asia. However, because of its dependence on overt behaviors observed during the coding, it was hypothesized that it might not be as effective in a country where different communicative norms are present. We conducted an experiment in Korea using two sets of survey questionnaires with embedded problematic questions in the experimental group to investigate the validity of behavior coding as reference to the control group. Using 200 audio recordings from a telephone survey, we investigated whether behavior-coded data were helpful in identifying embedded flaws. The results indicated behavior coding in Korean surveys may not be as effective as in Western countries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
