Social media are useful facilitators when recruiting hidden populations for research. In our research on youth and radicalization, we were able to find and contact young people with extreme ideals through Facebook. In this article, we discuss our experiences using Facebook as a tool for finding respondents who do not trust researchers. Facebook helped us recruit youths with extreme Islamic and extreme left-wing ideals. We conclude by discussing the benefits and limitations of using Facebook when searching for and approaching populations who are difficult to reach.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarrattM. J.PotterG. R.WoutersM.WilkinsC.WerseB.PeräläJ.Mulbjerg PedersenM.NguyenH.MalmA.LentonS.KorfD.KleinA.HeydeJ.HakkarainenP.Asmussen FrankV.DecorteT.BouchardM.BlokT.. 2015. Lessons from conducting trans-national Internet-mediated participatory research with hidden populations of cannabis cultivators. International Journal of Drug Policy26:238–49.
2.
BerkoA.2009. The path to paradise: The inner world of suicide bombers and their dispatchers. Washington, DC: Potomac Books.
3.
GielenA.-J.2008. Radicalisering en Identiteit: Radicale Rechtse en Moslimjongeren Vergeleken. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
4.
JuergensmeyerM.2003. Terror in the mind of god: The global rise of religious violence. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
5.
LeungL.2013. Generational differences in content generation in social media: The roles of the gratifications sought and of narcissism. Computers in Human Behaviour29:997–1006.
6.
MassonH.BalfeM.HackettS.PhillipsJ.. 2013. Lost without a trace? Social networking and social research with a hard-to-reach population. British Journal of Social Work43:24–40.
7.
PalysT.AtchinsonC.. 2012. Qualitative research in the digital era: Obstacles and opportunities. International Journal of Qualitative Research11:352–67.
8.
ParkinsonS.BromfieldL.. 2013. Recruiting young adults to child maltreatment research through Facebook: A feasibility study. Child Abuse & Neglect37:716–20.
9.
PruchaN.FisherA.. 2013. Tweeting for the caliphate: Twitter as the new frontier for jihadist propaganda. CTC Sentinel6:19–23.
10.
RichardsonL.2006. What terrorists want: Understanding the enemy, containing the threat. New York: Random House.
11.
SchmidA. P.PriceE.. 2011. Selected literature on radicalization and de-radicalization of terrorists: Monographs, edited volumes, grey literature and prime articles published since the 1960s. Crime, Law and Social Change55:337–48.
12.
SeltzerE. D.StolleyM. R.MensahE. K.SharpL. K.. 2014. Social networking site usage among childhood cancer survivors: A potential tool for research recruitment?Journal of Cancer Survivorship8:349–54.
13.
SieckelinckS.KaulingfreksF.de WinterM.. 2015. Neither villains nor victims: Towards an educational perspective on radicalization. British Journal of Educational Studies65:329–43.
14.
SternJ.2003. Terror in the name of god: Why religious militants kill. New York: HarperCollins.
15.
TurkleS.2011. Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
16.
Van SanM.2015. Striving in the way of God: Justifying jihad by young Belgian and Dutch Muslims. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism38:328–42.
17.
Van SanM.SieckelinckS.de WinterM.. 2013. Ideals adrift: An educational approach to radicalization. Ethics and Education8:276–89.