Researchers are often skeptical of sexual behavior surveys: Respondents may lie or forget details of their intimate lives, and interviewers may exercise authority in how they capture responses. We use data from a 2010–2011 cross-sectional sexual behavior survey in rural South Africa to explore who says what to whom about their sexual lives. Results show an effect of fieldworker age across outcomes: Respondents report “safer,” more “responsible” sexual behavior to older fieldworkers, and an effect of fieldworker sex; men report more sexual partners to female fieldworkers. Understanding fieldworker effects on the production of sexual behavior survey data serves methodological and analytical goals.
BeckerS.FeyisetanK.Makinwa-AdebusoyeP.1995. The effect of the sex of interviewers on the quality of data in a Nigerian family planning questionnaire. Studies in Family Planning26:233–40.
3.
Bignami-Van AsscheS.ReniersG.WeinrebA. A.2003. An assessment of the KDICP and MDIP data quality. Demographic ResearchS1:31–76.
4.
BlalockC.2014. Labor migration and employment in post-apartheid rural South Africa. PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Colorado, Boulder.
5.
DavisD. W.SilverB. D.2003. Stereotype threat and race of interviewer effects in a survey on political knowledge. American Journal of Political Science47:33–45.
6.
DavisR. E.CouperM. P.JanzN. K.CaldwellC. H.ResnicowK.2010. Interviewer effects in public health surveys. Health Education Research25:14–26. doi:10.1093/her/cyp046.
7.
EdwardsM.ThomsenS. C.Toroitich-RutoC.2005. Thinking aloud to create better condom use questions. Field Methods17:183–99. doi:10.1177/1525822x04271029.
8.
FordK.NorrisA. E.1997. Effects of interviewer age on reporting of sexual and reproductive behavior of Hispanic and African American youth. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences19:369–76. doi:10.1177/07399863970193008.
9.
GoffmanE. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.
10.
Gómez-OlivéF. X.AngottiN.HouleB.Klipstein-GrobuschK.KabudulaC.MenkenJaneWilliamsJillTollmanStephenClarkSamuel J.2013.Prevalence of HIV among those 15 and older in rural South Africa. AIDS Care: Psychological and Socio-medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV25:1122–28. doi:10.1080/09540121.2012.750710.
11.
GrahamC. A.CataniaJ. A.BrandR.DuongT.CancholaJ. A.2003. Recalling sexual behavior: A methodological analysis of memory recall bias via interview using the diary as the gold standard. Journal of Sex Research40:325–32.
12.
GribbleJ. N.MillerH. G.RogersS. M.TurnerC. F.1999. Interview mode and measurement of sexual behaviors: Methodological issues. Journal of Sex Research36:16–24. doi:10.1080/00224499909551963.
13.
GrovesR. M.FultzN. H.1985. Gender effects among telephone interviewers in a survey of economic attitudes. Sociological Methods & Research14:31–52.
14.
HewettP. C.MenschB. S.ErulkarA. S.2004. Consistency in the reporting of sexual behaviour by adolescent girls in Kenya: A comparison of interviewing methods. Sexually Transmitted Infections80:ii43–48. doi:10.1136/sti.2004.013250.
15.
JægerM. M.2013. Hello beautiful? The effect of interviewer physical attractiveness on interview success. Unpublished working paper no. 02/2013, the Danish National Centre for Social Research, Copenhagen, Denmark.
16.
KahnK.CollinsonM. A.Gomez-OlivéF. X.MokoenaO.TwineR.MeeP.AfolabiS. A.. 2012. Profile: Agincourt health and socio-demographic surveillance system. International Journal of Epidemiology41:988–1001. doi:10.1093/ije/dys115.
17.
McCombieS. C.AnarfiJ. K.2002. The influence of sex of interviewer on the results of an AIDS survey in Ghana. Human Organization61:51–57.
18.
OlooI.GustD. A.ShindeS.McLellan-LemalE.PalsS. L.ChegeWairimuGumbeAnneThomasTimothy K.MillsLisa A.ChenRobert T.2012. Effect of gender of the recorded voice on responses to sensitive sexual behavior questions: Use of audio computer-assisted self-interview (ACASI) in Kisumu, Kenya. Field Methods24:367–81. doi:10.1177/1525822x11432087.
19.
RandallS.CoastE.CompaoreN.AntoineP.2013. The power of the interviewer. Demographic Research28:763–92.
20.
ReichmannW. M.LosinaE.SeageG. R.IIIArbelaezC.SafrenS. A.KatzJeffrey N.HetlandAdamWalenskyRochelle P.2010. Does modality of survey administration impact data quality: Audio computer assisted self-interview (ACASI) versus self-administered pen and paper?PloS One5:e8728. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008728.
21.
WeinrebA. A.2006. The limitations of stranger-interviewers in rural Kenya. American Sociological Review71:1014–39.
22.
WellingsK.CollumbienM.SlaymakerE.SinghS.HodgesZ.PatelD.BajosN.2006. Sexual behaviour in context: A global perspective. The Lancet368:1706–28.
23.
WilliamsJ. R.IbisomiL.SartoriusB.KahnK.CollinsonM.TollmanS.GarenneM.2013. Convergence of fertility levels between South Africans and Mozambicans in rural northeast of South Africa, 1993–2009. Global Health Action6. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v6i0.19236.
