Growing rates of nonresponse to telephone surveys can contribute to nonresponse error, and interviewers contribute differentially to nonresponse. Why do some telephone interviewers have better response rates than others? This study uncovered a critical behavior of successful telephone interviewers over the course of introductions: responsive feedback. Using detailed coding of telephone introductions, I explored interviewers’ speech. Interviewers were most responsive to answerers in contacts that resulted in deferrals and least responsive in refusals. Practical applications for telephone interviewer training are discussed.
BenkíJ.BroomeJ.ConradF.GrovesR.KreuterF.. 2011. Effects of speech rate, pitch, and pausing on survey participation decisions. Paper presented at the 66th annual conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Phoenix, AZ, May 14.
2.
CampanelliP.SturgisP.PurdonS.. 1997. Can you hear me knocking: An investigation into the impact of interviewers on survey response rates. London: National Center for Social Research.
3.
ConradF. G.BroomeJ. S.BenkíJ. R.KreuterF.. 2013. Interviewer speech and the success of survey invitations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A(Statistics in Society)176:191–210.
4.
CurtinR.PresserS.SingerE.. 2005. Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century. Public Opinion Quarterly69:87–98.
5.
DurrantG. B.GrovesR. M.StaetskyL.SteeleF.. 2010. Effects of interviewer attitudes and behaviors on refusal in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly74:1–36.
6.
GrovesR. M.CouperM. P.. 1998. Nonresponse in household interview surveys. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
7.
GrovesR. M.McGonagleK. A.. 2001. A theory-guided interviewer training protocol regarding survey participation. Journal of Official Statistics17:249–65.
8.
GrovesR. M.PresserS.DipkoS.. 2004. The role of topic interest in survey participation decisions. Public Opinion Quarterly68:2–31.
9.
HoxJ.de LeeuwE. D.. 2002. The influence of interviewers’ attitude and behavior on household survey nonresponse: An international comparison. In Survey nonresponse, eds. GrovesR. M.DillmanD. A.EltingeJ. L.LittleR. J. A., 103–20. New York: John Wiley.
10.
LandisJ. R.KochG.. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics33:159–74.
11.
MaynardD. W.FreeseJ.SchaefferN. C.. 2010. Calling for participation: Requests, blocking moves, and rational (inter)action in survey introductions. American Sociological Review75:791–814.
12.
Morton-WilliamsJ.1993. Interviewer approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
OksenbergL.CannellC.. 1988. Effects of interviewer vocal characteristics on nonresponse. In Telephone survey methodology, eds. GrovesR. M.BiemerP. B.LybergL. E.MasseyJ. T.., 257–72. New York: John Wiley.
14.
O’MuircheartaighC.CampanelliP.. 1999. A multilevel exploration of the role of interviewers in survey non-response. Journal of the Royal Statistical SocietySeries A162:437–46.
15.
PondmanL. M.1998. The influence of the interviewer on the refusal rate in telephone interviews. Ph.D. dissertation, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
16.
SnijkersG.HoxJ.de LeeuwE. D.. 1999. Interviewers’ tactics for fighting survey nonresponse. Journal of Official Statistics15:185–98.
17.
TeitlerJ. O.ReichmanN. E.SprachmanS.. 2003. Costs and benefits of improving response rates for a hard-to-reach population. Public Opinion Quarterly67:126–38.
