This article provides an overview of a qualitative research method called transcendental method for research with human subjects. The method employs a transformative phenomenological approach and was developed using the philosophy of Bernard Lonergan. Reflective use of this method suggests that it has both investigational and interventional qualities, with transformative potential for both researcher and study participants.
BernardH. R.2000. About social science. In Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, ed. BernardH. R., 3–28. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
CharmazK.2001. Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In Handbook of interview research: Context & method, eds. GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A., 675–94. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
CreswellJ. W.1998. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
DaviesD.,DoddJ.. 2002. Qualitative research and the question of rigor. Qualitative Health Research12:279–89.
5.
GiorgiA.2000a. Concerning the application of phenomenology to caring research. Scandanavian Journal of Caring Sciences14:11–15.
6.
GiorgiA.2000b. The status of Husserlian phenomenology in caring research. Scandanavian Journal of Caring Sciences14:3–10.
7.
GiorgiA.2006. Concerning variations in the application of the phenomenological method. The Humanistic Psychologist34:305–19.
8.
HamillC.,SinclairH. A. H.. 2010. Bracketing—practical considerations in Husserlian phenomenological research. Nurse Researcher17:16–24.
9.
HillP. S.LeeV.JennawayM.. 2010. Researching reflexivity: Negotiating identity and ambiguity in a cross-cultural research project. Field Methods22:319–39.
10.
HusserlE.1999. Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology. CairnsD., trans. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11.
LonerganB.2000. Insight: A study of human understanding. In Collected works of Bernard Lonergan, 5th ed., vol. 3, eds. CroweF. E.DoranR. M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
12.
LonerganB.2001. Horizon, history, philosophy. In Collected works of Bernard Lonergan, Phenomenology and logic: The Boston College lectures on mathematical logic and existentialism, ed. McShaneP. J., 298–317. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
13.
LonerganB.J.F.2003. Method in theology. 2nd ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
14.
LopezK. A.,WillisD. G.. 2004. Descriptive versus interpretive phenomenology: Their contributions to nursing knowledge. Qualitative Health Research14:726–35.
15.
MoranD.2001. Introduction. In Introduction to phenomenology (pp. 1–22). London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
16.
NeumanW. L.2003. Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. 5th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
17.
NewmanM. A.1994. Health as expanding consciousness. 2nd ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
18.
NorlykA.,HarderI.. 2010. What makes a phenomenological study phenomenological? An analysis of peer-reviewed empirical nursing studies. Qualitative Health Research20:420–31.
19.
PerryD. J.2006. Transcendent pluralism and the evolution of the human spirit: A philosophical nursing inquiry using Lonergan’s transcendental method of transcendent pluralism in Catholics who support same-gender marriage. Ph.D. diss., Boston College.
20.
PerryD. J.2008. Catholic supporters of same-gender marriage: A case study of human dignity in a multicultural society. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.
21.
PerryD. J.2011. The Israeli-Palestinian peace movement: Combatants for Peace. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
22.
PriestH., 2002. An approach to the phenomenological analysis of data. Nurse Researcher10:50–63.
23.
RehorickD. A.,BentzV. M.. 2008. Transformative phenomenology: Changing ourselves, lifeworlds, and professional practice. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books/Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
24.
SandelowskiM.1993. Rigor or rigor mortis: The problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. Advances in Nursing Science16:1–8.
25.
SokolowskiR.2000. Introduction to phenomenology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
WallC.GlennS.MitchinsonS.PoolH.. 2004. Using a reflective diary to develop bracketing skills during a phenomenological investigation. Nurse Researcher11:20–29.
