Based on an analysis of native and nonnative language interviews, this article argues that being a nonnative interviewer, in a weaker position, makes it easier to elicit information from native interviewees. One reason for this is that the interviewer is obliged to let interviewees define their concepts, deferring to their position as a language authority and recognizing one aspect of the power relationship. Power in ethnographic interviewing is always negotiated, and this article demonstrates how the spoken languages of interviewer and interviewee affects ethnographic interviews and power dynamics in dialogs. Some useful discourse strategies for native and nonnative language ethnographic interviewers are also discussed.
Baxter, L.A., and B.M. Montgomery .1998. A guide to dialectical approaches to studying personal relationships. In Dialectical approaches to studying personal relationships, eds. B. M. Montegomery and L. A. Baxter , 1-16. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Blum-Kulka, S.1997. Discourse pragmatics. In Discourse as social interaction, ed. T. A. van Dijk, 38-63. London : SAGE.
3.
Briggs, C.L.1984. Learning how to ask: Native metacommunicative competence and incompetence of fieldworkers. Language in Society13:1-28.
4.
Briggs, C.L.1986. Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
5.
Briggs, C.L.2002. Interviewing, power/knowledge, and social inequality. In Handbook of interview research: Context and method, eds. J. F. Gubrium and J. A. Holstein , 911-22. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
6.
Briggs, C.L.2003. Interviewing, power/knowledge, and social inequality. In Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns, eds. J. A. Holstein and J. F. Gubrium, 495-506. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
7.
Briggs, C.L.2007. Anthropology, interviewing, and communicability in contemporary society. Current Anthropology48:551-80.
8.
Brown, P., and S.C. Levinson.1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Chang, H.-C., and G.R. Holt.1994. A Chinese perspective on face as inter-relational concern. In The challenge of facework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues, ed. S. Ting-Toomey, 95-132. Albany : State University of New York Press.
10.
Chen, C.-M.2004. Two types of code-switching in Taiwan. Paper presented at the 15th Sociolinguistic Symposium, University of Newcastle, April 1-4, UK.
11.
Chen, S.-C.2003. The spread of English in Taiwan: Changing uses and shifting attitudes. Taipei: Crane Publishing .
12.
Chen, S.-H.2009. Intercultural team teaching: A study of local and foreign EFL teachers in Taiwan. Unpublished PhD thesis. Durham, UK: Durham University.
13.
Coffey, A.1999. The ethnographic self. London: SAGE.
14.
Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison.2004. Research methods in education. 5th ed. London: RoutledgeFalmer .
15.
Eder, D., and L. Fingerson.2002. Interviewing children and adolescents . In Handbook of interview research: Context and method, eds. J. F. Gubrium and J. A. Holstein, 181-201. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
16.
Eder, D., and L. Fingerson.2003. Interviewing children and adolescents . In Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns, eds. J. A. Holstein and J. F. Gubrium, 33-53. Thousand Oaks: SAGE .
17.
Fairclough, N.2001. Language and power. 2nd ed. Essex, UK: Pearson Education Limited .
18.
Huang, S.F.1993. Language, society, and ethnic awareness: A study of Taiwanese sociolinguistics. Taipei: Crane Publisher.
19.
Kvale, S.1996. InterView. London: SAGE.
20.
Kvale, S.2007. Doing interviews. The SAGE Qualitative Research Kit Series, Uwe Flick. London: SAGE.
21.
Lincoln, Y.S., and E.G. Guba.1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
22.
Lucy, J. A., ed. 1993. Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
23.
Schiffrin, D.1994. Approaches to discourse. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
24.
Scollon, R., and S.W. Scollon.1994. Face parameters in East-West discourse . In The challenge of facework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues, ed. S. Ting-Toomey, 133-58. Albany : State University of New York Press.
25.
Shah, S.2004. The researcher/interviewer in intercultural context: A social intruder! British Educational Research Journal30:549-75.
26.
Spradley, J.P.1979. The ethnographic interview. New York : Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
27.
Tannen, D.2005. Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
Ting-Toomey, S.1988. Intercultural conflicts: A face-negotiation theory. In Theories in intercultural communication, eds. Y. Kim and W. Gudykunst , 213-35. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
29.
Winchatz, M.R.2006. Fieldworker or foreigner? Ethnographic interviewing in nonnative languages. Field Methods18:83-97.
30.
Wolcott, H.F.1999. Ethnography: A way of seeing. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
