Potential coverage bias in telephone surveys among the general population in Israel was studied in a random sample of 6,405 adults drawn from the population register. Registered telephone status (landline and mobile, mobile-only, no telephone) of each sampled individual was matched with his or her sociodemographic characteristics obtained from diverse databases. This facilitated estimation of the coverage properties of the landline telephone directory sampling list in Israel and identification of subpopulations potentially undercovered in telephone surveys. Nonveteran immigrants, individuals in the 30—44 age group, and those living in low socioeconomic areas proved systematically underrepresented in a telephone survey based on the landline telephone directory sampling list. Bias due to the exclusion of mobile-only individuals from the sampling list was also tested, and implications for sampling list selection are discussed.
Blumberg, S.J., and J.V. Luke.2007a. Wireless substitution: Early release of estimates based on data from the National Health Interview Survey, July-December 2006. National Center for Health Statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/wireless200705.pdf (accessed September 9, 2009).
2.
Blumberg, S.J., and J.V. Luke.2007b. Coverage bias in traditional telephone surveys of low-income and young adults. Public Opinion Quarterly71:734-49.
3.
Brick, J.M., and C. Tucker.2007. Mitofsky-Waksberg: Learning from the past. Public Opinion Quarterly71:703-16.
4.
Brick, J.M., J. Waksberg, D. Kulp, and A. Starer.1995. Bias in list-assisted telephone surveys . Public Opinion Quarterly59:218-35.
5.
Callegaro, M., and T. Poggio.2004. Where can I call you? The ‘‘mobile (phone) revolution’’ and its impact on survey research and coverage error: A discussion of the Italian case. Paper presented at ISA RC33 Sixth International Conference on Logic and Methodology: ‘‘Recent Developments and Applications in Social Research Methodology,’’Amsterdam, August 17-20. http://eprints.biblio.unitn.it/archive/00000680/ (accessed September 9, 2009).
6.
Central Bureau of Statistics.2008. Household expenditure survey 2006. Israel: CBS, 1308.
7.
Central Bureau of Statistics.2009. Household expenditure survey 2007. Israel: CBS, 1363.
8.
Duncan, K.B., and E.A. Stasny.2001. Using propensity scores to control coverage bias in telephone surveys. Survey Methodology27:121-30.
9.
Ehlen, J., and P. Ehlen.2007. Cellular-only substitution in the United States as lifestyle adoption. Public Opinion Quarterly71:713-33.
10.
Gordoni, G.2006. Respondents’ behavior in surveys of minority-majority attitudes in divided societies: A comparison between telephone and face-to-face surveys among Arabs and Jews in Israel. PhD diss., Haifa University.
11.
Groves, R.M.1989. Survey errors and survey costs. New York: Wiley.
12.
Groves, R.M., F.J. Fowler Jr., M.P. Couper, J.M. Lepkowski, E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau.2004. Survey methodology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
13.
Kamen, C.S.2005. The 2008 Israel integrated census of population and housing: Basic conception and procedure. Statistical Journal-United Nations Economic Commission for Europe22:39-58.
14.
Keeter, S.1995. Estimating telephone noncoverage bias with a telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly59:196-217.
15.
Kuusela, V., M. Callegaro, and V. Vahovar.2008. The influence of mobile telephone on telephone surveys. In Advances in telephone survey methodology , eds. J. M. Lepkowski, C. Tucker, M. J. Brick , E. D. De Leeuw, L. Japec, P. J. Lavrakas , M. W. Link, and R. L. Sangster, 87-112. New York: Wiley.
16.
Link, M.W., M.P. Battaglia, M.R. Frankel, L. Osborn, and A.H. Mokdad.2007. Reaching the U. S. cell phone generation: Comparison of cell phone results with an ongoing landline telephone survey . Public Opinion Quarterly71:814-39.
17.
McAuliffe, W.E., R. LaBrie, R. Woodworth, and C. Zhang.2002. Estimates of potential bias in telephone substance abuse surveys due to exclusion of households without telephones . Journal of Drug Issues32:1139-54.
18.
Nathan, G.2001. Telesurvey methodologies for household surveys: A review and some thoughts for the future. Survey Methodology27:7-31.
19.
Smith, T.W.1990. Phone home? An analysis of household telephone ownership . International Journal of Public Opinion Research2:369-90.
20.
Thornberry, O.T. Jr. , and J.T. Massey.1988. Trends in United States telephone coverage across time and subgroups. In Telephone survey methodology, eds. R. M. Groves., P. P. Biemer, L. E.Lyberg, J. T.Massey, W. L.Nicholls II, and J. Waksberg, 25-50. New York: Wiley.
21.
Traugott, M.W., R.M. Groves, and J.M. Lepkowski.1987. Using dual frame designs to resuce nonresponse in telephone surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly51:522-39.
22.
Tucker, C., J.M. Brick, and B. Meekins.2007. Household telephone service and usage patterns in the U.S. in 2004: Implications for telephone samples. Public Opinion Quarterly71:3-22.
23.
Vicente, P., and E. Reis.2009. The mobile-only population in Portugal and its impact in a dual frame telephone survey. Survey Research Methods3:105-11.
24.
Zuwallack, R.2009. Piloting data collection via cell phones: Results, experiences, and lessons learned. Field Methods21 (4): 388-406.
