To compare and combine qualitative and quantitative data collected from respondents in a mixed-methods study, the research team developed a relational database to merge survey responses stored and analyzed in SPSS and semi-structured interview responses stored and analyzed in the qualitative software package ATLAS.ti. The process of developing the database as well as practical considerations for researchers who may wish to use similar methods are explored.
Ames, G.M., J.W. Grube, and R.S. Moore.2000. Social control and workplace drinking norms: A comparison of two organizational cultures. Journal of Studies on Alcohol61 (2): 203-19.
Bernard, H.R.2002. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. 3rd ed. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
4.
Happ, M.B.2006. Exemplars of mixed methods data combination and analysis . Nursing Research55 (2-1): S43-S49.
5.
Harrington, J.L.2002. Relational database design clearly explained. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
6.
Kinn, S., and J. Curzio.2005. Integrating qualitative and quantitative research methods. Journal of Research in Nursing10 (3): 317-36.
7.
Krueger, B.2004. Why you should use a relational database instead of a spreadsheet. Cybernetics and Systems35 (7-8): 683-96.
8.
Moseley, L.G., and D.M. Mead.1993. Good relations: The use of a relational database for large-scale data analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing18 (11): 1795-1805.
9.
Muhr, T.2004. User’s manual for ATLAS.ti 5.0. Berlin: ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH .
10.
Poteete, A.R., and E. Ostrom.2008. Fifteen years of empirical research on collective action in natural resource management: Struggling to build large-N databases based on qualitative research. World Development36 (1): 176-95.
11.
Trochim, W.M.K. n.d. The qualitative debate. In Research methods knowledge base . http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/qualdeb.php (accessed March 10, 2008).
