Through the work of constructing a field site, researchers define the objects and subjects of their research. This article explores a variety of strategies devised by researchers to map social research onto spatial terrain. Virtual networked field sites are among the recent approaches that are challenging conventional thinking about field-based research. The benefits and consequences of one particular configuration, the field site as a network that incorporates physical, virtual, and imagined spaces, will be explored in detail through a case study. The author focuses in particular on the logistical issues involved and practical steps to constructing such a field site. This article includes suggestions for ways of studying social phenomena that take place on a vast terrain from a stationary position.
Anderson, B.1983. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
2.
Appadurai, A.1996. Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
3.
Barley, N.1983. The innocent anthropologist: Notes from a mud hut. London: British Museum Publications.
4.
Bassett, C.1997. Virtually gendered: Life in an on-line world. In The subcultures reader, ed. K. Gelder and S. Thornton, 537-50. London : Routledge.
5.
Baym, N.1995a. From practice to culture on Usenet. In The cultures of computing, ed. S. L. Star , 29-52. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
6.
Baym, N.1995b. The emergence of community in computer-mediated communication . In Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community , ed. S. Jones, 138-63. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Brydon-Miller, M., D. Greenwood, and P. Maguire.2003. Why action research? Action Research1 (1): 9-28.
8.
Carter, D.2005. Living in virtual communities: An ethnography of human relationships in cyberspace. Information, Communication and Society8 (2): 148-67.
9.
Castells, M.1996. The rise of the network society. Oxford , UK: Blackwell.
10.
Cefkin, M., and K. Anderson , eds. 2007. Ethnographic praxis in industry conference proceedings, Keystone, CO, October 3-6. http://www.epic2007.com/Draft-EPIC2007-Proceedings.pdf (accessed November 1, 2008).
11.
Charmaz, K.2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage .
12.
Clifford, J.1992. Travelling cultures. In Cultural studies , ed. L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, and P. Treichler, 96-116. New York: Routledge.
13.
Correll, S.1995. The ethnography of an electronic bar: The lesbian cafe . The Journal of Contemporary Ethnography24 (3): 270-98.
14.
Couldry, N.2003. Passing ethnographies: Rethinking the sites of agency and reflexivity in a mediated world. In Global media studies: Ethnographic perspectives, ed. P. Murphy and M. Kraidy, 40-56. New York: Routledge.
15.
Green, N.1999. Disrupting the field: Virtual reality technologies and "multisited" ethnographic methods. American Behavioral Scientist43 (3): 409-21.
16.
Gupta, A., and J. Ferguson.1997. Beyond "culture": Space, identity, and the politics of difference. In Culture, power, place: Explorations in critical anthropology, ed. A. Gupta and J. Ferguson, 33-51. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
17.
Hampton, K., and B. Wellman.2003. Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb. City and Community2 (4): 277-311.
18.
Hannerz, U.1992a. Cultural complexity: Studies in the social organization of meaning. New York: Columbia University Press.
19.
Hannerz, U.1992b. The global ecumene as a network of networks. In Conceptualizing society, ed. A. Kuper, 34-56. London: Routledge.
20.
Heath, D., E. Koch, B. Ley, and M. Montoya.1999. Nodes and queries: Linking locations in networked fields of inquiry. American Behavioral Scientist43 (3): 450-63.
21.
Henriksen, D.L.2002. Locating virtual field sites and a dispersed object of research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems14 (2): 31-45.
22.
Hine, C.2000. Virtual ethnography. London: Sage .
23.
Howard, P.N.2002. Network ethnography and the hypermedia organization: New media, new organizations, new methods. New Media and Society4 (4): 550-74.
24.
Jordan, B., and B. Dahl.2006. Persuasive encounters: Ethnography in the corporation. Field Methods18 (4): 359-81.
25.
Jovchelovitch, S., and M. Bauer.2000. Narrative interviewing. In Qualitative researching with text, image and sound, ed. M. Bauer and G. Gaskell , 57-74. London: Sage.
26.
Leander, K., and K. McKim.2003. Tracing the everyday "sitings" of adolescents on the Internet: A strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offline spaces. Education, Communication, and Information3 (2): 211-40.
27.
Lewis, S., M. Mateas, S. Palmiter, and G. Lynch.1996. Ethnographic data for product development: A collaborative process. Interactions3 (6): 52-69.
28.
Lovejoy, T., and K. Anderson , eds. 2006. Ethnographic praxis in industry conference proceedings, Portland, OR, September 24-26. http://www.epic2006.com/proceedings.pdf (accessed November 1, 2008).
Marcus, G.1998a. Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. In Ethnography through thick and thin , ed. G. Marcus, 79-104. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
Marcus, G.1998b. Imagining the whole: Ethnography's contemporary efforts to situate itself. In Ethnography through thick and thin, ed. G. Marcus, 33-56. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
32.
Marcus, G., and M.M.J. Fischer.1986. Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
McLelland, M.2002. Virtual ethnography: Using the Internet to study gay culture in Japan. Sexualities5 (4): 387-406.
34.
Miller, D., and D. Slater.2000. The Internet: An ethnographic approach . London: Berg.
35.
Mitchell, W.1996. City of bits: Space, place, and the infobahn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
Nelson, D.1996. Maya hackers and the cyberspatialized nation-state: Modernity, ethnostalgia, and a lizard queen in Guatemala. Cultural Anthropology11 (3): 287-308.
37.
Olwig, K. F., and K. Hastrup, eds. 1997. Siting culture: The shifting anthropological object. London: Routledge.
38.
Ong, A., and D. Nonini , eds. 1997. Ungrounded empires: The cultural politics of modern Chinese transnationalism. New York: Routledge.
39.
Orr, J.1996. Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job . Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
40.
Piot, C.1999. Remotely global: Village modernity in West Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
Rheingold, H.1993. The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
42.
Ruhleder, K.2000. The virtual ethnographer: Fieldwork in distributed electronic environments. Field Methods12 (1): 3-17.
43.
Salvador, T., G. Bell, and K. Anderson.1999. Design ethnography. Design Management Journal10 (4): 35-41.
44.
Strathern, M.1996. Cutting the network. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute2 (3): 517-35.
45.
Suchman, L., J. Blomberg, J. Orr, and R. Trigg.1999. Reconstructing technologies as social practice. American Behavioral Scientist43 (3): 392-408.
46.
Sunden, J.2002. Cyberbodies: Writing gender in digital self-presentations . In Digital border-lands: Cultural studies of identity and interactivity on the Internet, ed. J. Fornas , K. Klein, M. Ladendorf, J. Sunden, and M. Sveningsson, 79-111. New York: Peter Lang.
47.
Tacchi, J., D. Slater, and G. Hearn.2003. Ethnographic action research. New Delhi: UNESCO.
48.
Taylor, C.2002. Modern social imaginaries. Public Culture14 (1): 91-124.
49.
Taylor, T.L. (1999). Life in virtual worlds: Plural existence, multimodalities, and other online research challenges. American Behavioral Scientist43 (3): 436-49.
50.
Tsing, A.L.1993. In the realm of the diamond queen: Marginality in an out-of-the-way place. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
Turkle, S.1995. Life on screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
52.
Wakeford, N.1999. Gender and the landscapes of computing in an Internet café. In Virtual geographies: Bodies, spaces and relations , ed. M. Crang, P. Crang, and J. May, 178-201. London : Routledge.
53.
Ward, K.1999. Cyber-ethnography and the emergence of the virtually new community. Journal of Information Technology14 (1): 95-105.
54.
Watson, N.1997. Why we argue about virtual community: A case study of the Phish.Net fan community. In Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety, ed. S. G. Jones, 102-32. London: Sage.
Wilson, B.2006. Ethnography, the Internet, and youth culture: Strategies for examining social resistance and "online-offline" relationships. Canadian Journal of Education29 (1): 307-46.
