This article describes differences in access and cooperation in four qualitative research studies in public schools. Gatekeepers grant formal access but withhold cooperation if they think studies threaten them or their schools. Project approval by official gatekeepers does not guarantee cooperation from informal gatekeepers and participants. The author describes gatekeepers' practices to grant or withhold access and cooperation and the influence of perceived benefits and threats to cooperation. The article concludes with lessons from these research experiences that may lead to more cooperative relationships between researchers and gatekeepers.
Bell, J.2003. Crossing that yellow line: Obtaining access to the police departments. In Gaining access: A practical and theoretical guide for qualitative researchers, edited by M. S. Feldman, J. Bell, and M. T. Berger, 133-38. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
2.
Berg, B.L.2004. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. 5th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3.
Bogdan, R.C., and S.K. Biklen.2003. Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
Burgess, R.G.1991. Sponsors, gatekeepers, members, and friends: Access in educational settings. In Experiencing fieldwork: An inside view of qualitative research, edited by W. B. Shaffir and R. A. Stebbins, 43-52. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
Feldman, M.S., J. Bell, and M.T. Berger.2003. Gaining access: A practical and theoretical guide for qualitative researchers. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
6.
Geer, B.1970. Studying a college. In Pathways to data , edited by R. W. Habeinstein, 81-98. Chicago : Aldine.
7.
Glesne, C.1999. Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. 2nd ed. New York: Longman .
8.
Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson.1995. Ethnography: Principles in practice . London: Routledge.
9.
Hughes, E.C.1960. Introduction: The place of field work and social science . In Field work: An introduction to the social sciences, edited by B. Junker, iii-xiii. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Johnson, J.M.1975. Doing field research. New York: Free Press.
11.
Magolda, P.2000. Accessing, waiting, plunging in, wondering, and writing: Retrospective sense-making of fieldwork. Field Methods12 (3): 209-34.
Maruyama, G., and S. Deno.1992. Research in educational settings. Vol. 29 of Applied social research methods series. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
Patton, M.Q.2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Powers, R.C.1965. Identifying the community power structure. North Central Regional Extension Publication no. 19. Ames: Iowa State University.
16.
Rossman, G.B., and S.F. Rallis.2003. Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Shaffir, W. B., and R. A. Stebbins, eds. 1991. Experiencing fieldwork: An inside view of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
18.
Shaffir, W. B.,R. A. Stebbins , and A. Turowetz, eds. 1980. Fieldwork experience: Qualitative approaches to social research. New York: St. Martin's Press.
19.
Taylor, S.J., and R. Bogdan.1998. Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. New York: John Wiley.
20.
Van Maanen, J.1998. Tales of the field. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Wax, R.H.1971. Doing fieldwork: Warnings and advice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
