The universality of multipurpose taxonomies has been widely established in folk biology. However, recent studies with nonprofessional fish experts in the United States as well as with tree experts in the Chicago area suggest that different goals can affect category organization of natural kinds. This article reports the results of a triad task study exploring specific aspects of the multipurpose plant taxonomy among the Tzotzil Maya of Zinacantán in the Highlands of Chiapas. Despite previously encountered differences with respect to saliency, no corresponding differences with respect to conceptual organization could be detected. A balanced incomplete block design was applied. Resolution was enhanced by allowing participants to judge the three items as either “too similar” or “too different” in addition to single out one item as different. Analyses explore (1) the pattern of informant agreement (as a precondition for), (2) the content of existing models, and (3) the saliency of responses.
Atran, S.1998. Folkbiology and the anthropology of science: Cognitive universals and cultural particulars. Behavioral Brain Sciences21 (4): 547-609.
2.
Atran, S., D. Medin, and N. Ross. 2004. Evolution and devolution of knowledge: A tale of two biologies. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Society10 (2): 395-420.
3.
Atran, S., D. Medin, N. Ross, E. Lynch, J. Coley, E. U. Ek’, and V. Vapnarsky. 1999. Folkecology and commons management in the Maya Lowlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America96: 7598-7603.
4.
Berlin, B.1992. Ethnobiological classification. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
Boster, J.1986. Exchange varieties and information between Aguaruna manioc cultivators. American Anthropologist88 (2): 428-436.
6.
Breedlove, D., and R. Laughlin. 1993. The flowering of man: A Tzotzil botany of Zinacantán. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute Press.
7.
Burton, M., and S. Nerlove. 1976. Balanced designs for triad tests: Two examples from English. Social Science Research5: 247-267.
8.
Cancian, F.1965. Economics and prestige in a Maya community: A study of the religious Cargo system in Zinacantán, Chiapas, Mexico. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
Cancian, F.1992. The decline of community in Zinacantán: Economy, public life and social stratification, 1960-1987. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
Coley, J.1995. Emerging differentiation of folkbiology and folkpsychology: Attributions of biological and psychological properties to living things. Child Development66: 1856-1874.
11.
Collier, G.1975. Field of the Tzotzil: The ecological basis of tradition in highland Chiap as. Austin: University of Texas Press.
12.
Collier, G.1999. Basta! Land & the Zapatista rebellion in Chiapas. Rev. ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Freeman, L., A. K. Romney, J. Ferreira-Pinto, R. E. Klein, and T. Smith. 1982. Guatemalan and U.S. concepts of success and failure. Human Organization40 (2): 140-145.
14.
La Torre Cuadros, M., and N. Ross. 2003. Secondary biodiversity: Local perceptions of forest habitats among the Maya of Solferino, Quintana Roo, Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology23 (2): 287-308.
15.
López, A., S. Atran, J. D. Coley, D. L. Medin, and E. E. Smith. 1997. The tree of life: Universal and cultural features of folkbiological taxonomies and inductions. Cognitive Psychology32: 251-295.
16.
Medin, D., E. Lynch, J. D. Coley, and S. Atran. 1997. Categorization and reasoning among tree experts: Do all roads lead to Rome?Cognitive Psychology32: 49-96.
17.
Medin, D., N. Ross, S. Atran, R. C. Burnett, and S. V. Blok. 2002. Categorization and reasoning in relation to culture and expertise. Psychologyof Learning and Motivation Vol. 41, ed. B. H. Ross, 1-41. New York: Academic Press.
18.
Medin, D., N. Ross, S. Atran, R. C. Burnett, and S. V. Blok. Forthcoming. The role of culture in the folkbiology of freshwater fish. Cognition.
19.
Romney, A. K., and R. D’Andrade. 1964. Cognitive aspects of English kinterms. American Anthropologist68: 146-170.
20.
Romney, A. K., S. C. Weller, and W. H. Batchelder. 1986. Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist88: 313-338.
21.
Ross, N. 1994. Die Entwicklung der Blumenindustrie in Zinacantán. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 119:59-73.
22.
Ross, N. 2001. Bilder vom Regenwald: Mentale Modelle, Kulturwandel und Umweltverhalten bei den Lakandonen in Mexiko. Münster, Germany: Lit Verlag.
23.
Ross, N.2002. Cognitive aspects of intergenerational change: Mental models, cultural change and environmental behavior among the Lacandon Maya of southern Mexico. Human Organization61: 125-138.
24.
Ross, N.2004. Culture and cognition: Some implications for theory and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Ross, N. (2005). “We are all flowering”: A cultural account of the naming of plants among the Tzotzil Maya. In Categorization inside and outside the laboratory: Essays in honor of Douglas Medin, ed. W. Ahn, R. Goldstone, B. Love, A. Markman, and P. Wolff, 15-27. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26.
Ross, N., and D. Medin. 2005. Ethnography and experiments: Cultural models and expertise effects elicited with experimental research techniques. Field Methods17 (2): 131-149.
27.
Vogt, E. Z.1994. Fieldwork among the Maya: Reflections on the Harvard Chiapas Project. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
28.
Weller, S. C., and A. K. Romney. 1988. Systematic data collection. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
Wolff, P., D. Medin, and C. Pankratz. 1999. Evolution and devolution of folkbiological knowledge. Cognition73: 177-204.
