Modern scientific knowledge and indigenous or traditionally based knowledge are often assumed to be fundamentally different and incomparable. Testing this assumption is important theoretically and for supporting scientist-farmer collaboration to improve farmers’ well-being in their own terms. We illustrate the use of scenarios based on a basic biological model to understand farmers’ theoretical biological knowledge. Scenarios depict aspects of the model in terms comprehensible to farmers and relevant to collaboration with scientific plant breeders. Results suggest that scenarios are useful for eliciting traditionally based biological knowledge and that farmers’ theoretical biological knowledge is based on the same model as that of scientists.
Agrawal, A.1995. Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change26: 413-439.
2.
Atlin, G. N., K. B. McRae, and X. Lu.2000. Genotype × region interaction for two-row barley yield in Canada. Crop Science40: 1-6.
3.
Briggs, J., I. D. Pulford, M. Badri, and A. S. Shaheen. 1998. Indigenous and scientific knowledge: The choice and management of cultivation sites by Bedouin in Upper Egypt. Soil Use and Management14: 240-245.
4.
Ceccarelli, S., and S. Grando. 2002. Plant breeding with farmers requires testing the assumptions of conventional plant breeding: Lessons from the ICARDA barley program. In Farmers, scientists and plant breeding: Integrating knowledge and practice, ed. D. A. Cleveland and D. Soleri, 297-332. Oxon, UK: CAB International.
5.
Centro Internacionalde Mejoramientode Maíz y Trigo. 2003.Guiding questions. www.cimmyt.org/Research/economics/oaxaca/overview/questions.htm.
6.
Cleveland, D. A.2001. Is plant breeding science objective truth or social construction? The case of yield stability. Agriculture and Human Values18 (3): 251-270.
7.
Cleveland, D. A., and D. Soleri. 2002a. Indigenous and scientific knowledge of plant breeding: Similarities, differences, and implications for collaboration. In “Participating in development”: Approaches to indigenous knowledge, ed. P. Sillitoe, A. J. Bicker, and J. Pottier, 206-234. London: Routledge.
8.
Cleveland, D. A., and D. Soleri. 2002b. Introduction: Farmers, scientists and plant breeding—Knowledge, practice, and the possibilities for collaboration. In Farmers, scientists and plant breeding: Integrating knowledge and practice, ed. D. A. Cleveland and D. Soleri, 1-18. Oxon, UK: CAB International.
9.
Cleveland, D. A., D. Soleri, and S. E. Smith. 2000. A biological framework for understanding farmers’ plant breeding. Economic Botany54: 377-394.
10.
Costanza, R.2001. Visions, values, valuation, and the need for ecological economics. BioScience51: 459-468.
11.
Ellen, R., and H. Harris. 2000. Introduction. In Indigenous environmental knowledge and its transformations: Critical anthropological perspectives, ed. R. Ellen, P. Parkes, and A. Bicker, 1-33. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.
12.
Falconer, D. S., and T. F. Mackay. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed.Edinburgh, UK: Prentice Hall/Pearson Education.
13.
Giere, R. N.1999. Science without laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Heemskerk, M.2003. Scenarios in anthropology: Reflections on possible futures of the Suriname Maroons. Futures35: 931-949.
15.
Hull, D. L.1988. Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
McGuire, S., G. Manicad, and L. Sperling. 2003. Technical and institutional issues in participatory plant breeding done from a perspective of farmer plant breeding: A global analysis of issues and of current experience. Working Document No. 2, March 1999. Cali, Columbia: CGIAR System wide Program on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis for Technology Development and Institutional Innovation.
17.
Medin, D. L., and S. Atran. 1999. Introduction. In Folkbiology, ed. D. L. Medin and S. Atran, 1-15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
National Research Council of the National Academies. 2002. Environmental effects of transgenic plants: The scope and adequacy of regulation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
19.
Peterson, G. D., G. S. Cummings, and S. R. Carpenter. 2003. Scenario planning: A tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conservation Biology17: 358-366.
20.
Rice, E., M. Smale, and J.-L. Blanco. 1998. Farmers’ use of improved seed selection practices in Mexican maize: Evidence and issues from the Sierra de Santa Marta. World Development26: 1625-1640.
21.
SAS Institute. 2001. SAS version 8.02. Computer software. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
22.
Scott, J. C.1998. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
Sillitoe, P.1998. Knowing the land: Soil and land resource evaluation and indigenous knowledge. Soil Use and Management14: 188-193.
24.
Simmonds, N. W., and J. Smartt. 1999. Principles of crop improvement. 2nd ed.Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.
25.
Soleri, D., and D. A. Cleveland. 2001. Farmers’ genetic perceptions regarding their crop populations: An example with maize in the central valleys of Oaxaca, Mexico. Economic Botany55: 106-128.
26.
Soleri, D., and D. A. Cleveland. 2004. Farmer selection and conservation of crop varieties. In Encyclopedia of plant & crop science, ed. R. M. Goodman, 433-438. New York: Marcel Dekker.
27.
Soleri, D., D. A. Cleveland, F. Aragón Cuevas, S. Ceccarelli, M. Diarra, S. Grando, S. Lacy, M. Michael, R. Ortiz, R. B. Rana, F. Rattunde, D. Rijal, H. Ríos Labrada, A. Sangar, S. Amadou, S. E. Smith, I. Traor, and E. R. Weltzien. 2003. Farmers’ perceptions of crop genotype-environment interactions in five locations around the world. Unpublished manuscript.
28.
Soleri, D., D. A. Cleveland, D. Eriacho, F. Bowannie, Jr., A. Laahty, and Zuni community members. 1994. Gifts from the Creator: Intellectual property rights and folk crop varieties. In IPR for indigenous peoples: A sourcebook, ed. T. Greaves, 21-40. Oklahoma City, OK: Society for Applied Anthropology.
29.
Soleri, D., D. A. Cleveland, S. E. Smith, S. Ceccarelli, S. Grando, R. B. Rana, D. Rijal, and H. Ríos Labrada. 2002. Understanding farmers’ knowledge as the basis for collaboration with plant breeders: Methodological development and examples from ongoing research in Mexico, Syria, Cuba, and Nepal. In Farmers, scientists and plant breeding: Integrating knowledge and practice, ed. D. A. Cleveland and D. Soleri,19-60. Oxon, UK: CAB International.
30.
Soleri, D., S. E. Smith, and D. A. Cleveland. 2000. Evaluating the potential for farmer and plant breeder collaboration: A case study of farmer maize selection in Oaxaca, Mexico. Euphytica116: 41-57.
31.
Weltzien, E., M. E. Smith, L. S. Meitzner, and L. Sperling. 2003. Technical and institutional issues in participatory plant breeding—from the perspective of formal plant breeding. A global analysis of issues, results, and current experience. PPB Monograph. Cali, Columbia: PRGA Program Coordination Office, Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical.
