This article reflects on the work of recruiting participants for survey research. Published accounts in this area frequently neglect complex and time-consuming elements of the recruiting process. These are negotiating access with gatekeepers, negotiating the cooperation of participants, and emotional engagement in the recruitment process. This article describes these processes through the example of recruiting nonprofessional young workers for a survey on sex, drugs, and drinking. The challenges of recruiting for a quantitative study where there is limited rather than prolonged engagement in the field are examined in detail, and strategies for overcoming recruitment barriers are offered.
Brown, W. J., L. Bryson, J. E. Byles, A. J. Dobson, C. Lee, G. Mishra, and M. Schofield. 1998. Women’s health Australia: Recruitment for a national longitudinal cohort study. Women and Health28(1): 23–40.
2.
Carey, T. S., L. Kinsinger, T. Keyserling, and R. Harris. 1996. Research in the community: Recruiting and retaining practices. Journal of Community Health21(5): 315–328.
3.
Dillman, D. A.2000. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley.
4.
Lindsay, J.1999. Young workers, health and social life. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society.
5.
Lindsay, J.2001. Sex, drugs and drinking: Health risks in the social lives of young workers. Youth Studies Australia20(4): 11–18.
6.
Lofland, J., and L. H. Lofland. 1984. Analyzing social settings. San Francisco: Wadsworth.
7.
Michrina, B. P., and C. Richards. 1996. Person to person: Fieldwork, dialogue, and the hermeneutic method. Albany: State University of New York Press.
8.
Morrow, R. A.1994. Critical theory and methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Ostrander, S. A.1995.Surely you’re not in this just to be helpful: Access, rapport, and interviews in three studies of elites. In Studying elites using qualitative methods, edited by R. Hertz and J. B. Imber, 133–150. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Patrick, J. H., R. A. Pruchno, and M. S. Rose. 1998. Recruiting research participants: A comparison of the costs and effectiveness of five recruitment strategies. The Gerontologist38(2): 295–302.
11.
Pound, B., M. Riddel, G. Byrnes, and H. Kelly. 2000. Perception of social value predicts participation in school-based research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health24(5): 543–545.
12.
Reay, D.1996. Dealing with difficult differences: Reflexivity and social class in feminist research. Feminism and Psychology6(3): 443–456.
13.
Senn, C. Y., and S. Desmaris. 2001. Are our recruitment practices for sex studies working across gender? The effect of topic and gender of recruiter on participation rates of university men and women. The Journal of Sex Research38(2): 111–117.
14.
Shaffir, W. B., and R. A. Stebbins.1991.Introduction. In Experiencing field work: An inside view of qualitative research, edited by W. B. Shaffir and R. A. Stebbins, 1–24. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
