This study is the preliminary evaluation of acceptability and feasibility of physical activity self-monitoring survey by pedometer. The authors recruited 375 people from a possible 1,200 who completed a randomized, population-based telephone survey administered in 2001 to individuals living in Sumter Co3unty, South Carolina. Mailed kits included pedometer, instructions, a recording calendar, and a postage-paid return envelope. Participants wore the pedometer during waking hours and recorded day-end steps taken for seven days. Up to three telephone prompts were made to get participants to return data. Despite the limitations of initial recruitment, this study provides preliminary information on the acceptability and feasibility of a pedometer-assessed physical activity self-monitoring survey.
Ainsworth, B. E., A. S. Leon, M. T. Richardson, D. R. Jacobs, and R. S. Paffenbarger. 1993. Accuracy of the college alumnus physical activity questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology46 (12): 1403–1411.
2.
Ainsworth, B. E., A. S. Leon, M. T. Richardson, D. R. Jacobs, and B. Sternfeld. 1999. Accuracy of recall of occupational physical activity by questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology52 (3): 219–227.
3.
Bassett, Jr., D. R.2000. Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport71 (2): 30–36.
4.
Bassett, Jr., D. R., B. E. Ainsworth, S. R., Leggett, C. A. Mathien, J. A. Main, D. C. Hunter, and G. E. Duncan. 1996. Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walked. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise28 (8): 1071–1077.
5.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2001. Physical activity trends—United States, 1990–1998. Morbibity and Mortality Weekly Report50 (9): 166–169.
6.
Dillman, D.2000. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley.
7.
Etter, J. F., T. V. Perneger, and A. Ronchi. 1998. Collecting saliva samples by mail. American Journal of Epidemiology147 (2): 141–146.
8.
Frey, J. H. (1989). Survey research by telephone. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Kriska, A. M., W. C. Knowler, R. E. LaPorte, A. L. Drash, R. R. Wing, S. N. Blair, P. H. Bennett, and L. H. Kuller. 1990. Development of questionnaire to examine relationship of physical activity and diabetes in Pima Indians. Diabetes Care13 (4): 401–411.
10.
Leenders, N. Y. J. M., W. M. Sherman, H. N. Nagaraja, and C. L. Kien. 2001. Evaluation of methods to assess physical activity in free-living conditions. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise33 (7): 1233–1240.
11.
Mokdad, A. H., B. A. Bowman, E. S. Ford, F. Vinicor, J. S. Marks, and J. P. Koplan. (2001). The continuing epidemics of obesity and diabetes in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association286 (10): 1195–1200.
12.
Pratt, M., C. A. Macera, and C. Blanton. 1999. Levels of physical activity and inactivity in children and adults in the United States: Current evidence and research issues. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise31 (11 Suppl.): S526–S533.
13.
Sarkin, J. A., J. F. Nichols, J. F. Sallis, and K. J. Calfas. 2000. Self-report measures and scoring protocols affect prevalence of estimates of meeting physical activity guidelines. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise32 (1): 149–156.
14.
Sequeira, M. M., M. Rickenbach, V. Wietlisbach, B. Tullen, and Y. Schutz. 1995. Physical activity assessment using a pedometer and its comparison with a questionnaire in a large population survey. American Journal of Epidemiology142 (9): 989–999.
15.
Tudor-Locke, C., and A. M. Myers. 2001a. Challenges and opportunities for measuring physical activity in sedentary adults. Sports Medicine31 (2): 91–100.
16.
Tudor-Locke, C., and A. M. Myers. 2001b. Methodological considerations for researchers and practitioners using pedometers to measure physical (ambulatory) activity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport72 (1): 1–12.
17.
Tudor-Locke, C., J. E. Williams, J. P. Reis, and D. Pluto. 2002. Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity: Convergent validity. Sports Medicine32 (12): 795–808.
18.
Tudor-Locke, C., R. C. Bell, A. M. Myers, S. B. Harris, N. Lauzon, and N. W. Rodger. 2002. Pedometer-determined ambulatory activity in individuals with Type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice55 (3): 191–199.
19.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1996. Physical activity and health: A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Promotion.
20.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2000. Healthy people 2010: Conference edition. Washington, DC: Author.
21.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2001. The Surgeon General’s call to action to prevent and decrease overweight and obesity. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General.
22.
Westerterp, K. R.1999. Assessment of physical activity level in relation to obesity: Current evidence and research issues. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise31 (Suppl. 11): S522–S525.
