In the past quarter century, the technology for conducting telephone interviews has changed significantly. Fundamental interviewing concepts, however, have changed little. This article examines the art of telephone interviewing from the perspective of a telephone surveyer. Through her experiences, the author shows how mastering the production and interpretation of sounds is a key communication tool for producing successful and informative interviews.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Converse, J. M., and H. Schuman. 1974. Conversations at random: Survey research as interviewers see it. New York: John Wiley.
2.
Hagan, D. E., and C. M. Collier. 1983. Must respondent selection procedures for telephone surveys be invasive? Public Opinion Quarterly47 (4): 547–556.
3.
Lavin, D., and D. W. Maynard. 2001. Standardization vs. rapport: Respondent laughter and interviewer reaction during telephone surveys. American Sociological Review66 (3): 453–479.
4.
Lavrakas, P. J. 1987. Telephone survey methods: Sampling, selection, and supervision. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
Reingen, P. H., and J. B. Kernan. 1977. Compliance with an interview request: A foot-in-the-door, self perception interpretation. Journal of Marketing Research14 (3): 365–369.
6.
Taylor, H. 1997. The very different methods used to conduct telephone surveys of the public. Journal of the Market Research Society39 (3): 421–432.
7.
Tucker, C. 1983. Interviewer effects in telephone surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly47 (1): 84–94.
8.
Weeks, M. F., R. A. Kulka, and S. A. Pierson. 1987. Optimal call scheduling for a telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly51 (4): 540–549.
