Ultimatum Game with Ethnicity Manipulation: Problems Faced Doing Field Economic Experiments and their Solutions

Abstract

This article reports the experiences of one ethnographer conducting economic experiments in Bulgan Sum, Khovd, Republic of Mongolia. Torguud and Kazakh nomadic pastoralists played the ultimatum game against anonymous coethnics and nonethnics. The evidence gathered is relevant to (1) whether there is an in-group favoritism bias as maintained by social identity theory and social categorization theory and (2) whether non-Western populations behave differently from the now relatively well-studied Western populations in ways that are plausible given their culture. Special attention is given to the challenges involved in adapting this valuable research method to non-Western populations in rural settings. The biggest difficulty had to do with bootstrapping for participants all of the “obvious” background cultural assumptions about experiments as social situations, which an ideal participant carries in his head and which are assumed to be there rather than verified when conducting experiments in the West.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barth, F., ed. 1969. Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of cultural differences. Boston: Little, Brown.

Camerer, Colin, and Richard H. Thaler. 1995. Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators and manners. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (2): 209–219.

Diehl, M. 1988. Social identity and minimal groups: The effects of interpersonal and intergroup attitudinal similarity on intergroup discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology 27:289–300.

Diehl, M. 1990. The minimal group paradigm: Theoretical explanations and empirical findings. European Review of Social Psychology 1:263–292.

Epps, T. W., and K. J. Singleton. 1986. An omnibus test for the two-sample problem using the empirical characteristic function. Journal of Statistics and Computer Simulation 26:177–203.

Fershtman, C., and U. Gneezy. 2001. Discrimination in a segmented society: An experimental approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116:351–377.

Gaertner, L. A., and C. A. Insko. 2000. Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Categorization, reciprocation, or fear? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 79:77–94.

Gil-White, F. J. 1999. How thick is blood? The plot thickens...: If ethnic actors are primordialists, what remains of the circumstantialist/primordialist controversy? Ethnic and Racial Studies 22 (5): 789–820.

Gil-White, F. J. 2001a. Are ethnic groups biological “species” to the human brain? Essentialism in our cognition of some social categories. Current Anthropology 42 (4): 515–554.

10.

Gil-White, F. J. 2001b. A good experiment of choice behavior is a good caricature of a real situation. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 24 (3): 409.

11.

Gil-White, F. J. 2002. The cognition of ethnicity: Native category systems under the field-experimental microscope. Field Methods 14:170–198.

12.

Gil-White, F. J. 2004. Ultimatum game with an ethnicity manipulation: Results from Khovdiin Bulgan Sum, Mongolia. In Foundations of human sociality: Ethnography and experiments in 15 small-scale societies, edited by J. Henrich, R. Boyd, S. Bowles, H. Gintis, E. Fehr, and C. Camerer. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

13.

Hartstone, M., and M. Augoustinos. 1995. The minimal group paradigm: Categorization into two versus three groups. European Journal of Social Psychology 25:179–193.

14.

Henrich, J. 2000. Does culture matter in economic behavior? Ultimatum game bargaining among the Machiguenga. American Economic Review 90 (4): 973–979.

15.

Henrich, J., R. Boyd, S. Bowles, H. Gintis, E. Fehr, and C. Camerer. 2004. Foundations of human sociality: Ethnography and experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

16.

Kurzban, R. 2003. Minimal group experiments. In The encyclopedia of cognitive science, edited by L. Nadel, 34–37. London: Macmillan.

17.

Mummendey, A., B. Simon, C. Dietze, M. Grünert, G. Haeger, S. Kessler, S. Lettgen, and S. Shäferhoff. 1992. Categorization is not enough: Intergroup discrimination in negative outcome allocation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 28:125–144.

18.

Tajfel, H. 1970. Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American 223 (5): 96–102.

19.

Tajfel, H. 1982. Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology 33:1–39.

20.

Tajfel, H., and J. C. Turner. 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In The social psychology of intergroup relations, edited by S. Worchel and W. G. Austin, 33–47, Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

21.

Turner, J. C. 1978. Social categorization and social discrimination in the minimal group paradigm. In Differentiation between social groups, edited by H. Tajfel, 101–140. London: Academic Press.

22.

Turner, J. C., M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, and M. S. Wetherell. 1987. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

23.

Yamagishi, T., N. Jin, and A. S. Miller. 1998. In-group bias and culture of collectivism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 1:315–328.

24.

Zeelenberg, M., and J. Beattie. 1997. Consequences of regret a version 2: Additional evidence for effects of feedback on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 72:63–78.