Self-administered questionnaires have many advantages, especially when sensitive questions are asked. However, self-administered paper questionnaires have a serious drawback: Only relatively simple questionnaires can be used. Computer-assisted self-interviewing (CASI) can overcome these problems. CASI can be part of a personal interview in which the interviewer hands the computer over to the respondent for specific questions. It also can be a computerized version of the disk-by-mail survey. The authors have used both forms with very special populations (primary school children, visually impaired young adults, and parents and children from multiproblem families, in which professional guidance for the family was sought). This article introduces CASI and reviews its advantages and disadvantages, giving special attention to data quality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aquilino, W. 1994. Interview mode effects in surveys of drug and alcohol use. Public Opinion Quarterly58:210-240.
2.
Baker, R. P. 1998. The CASI future. In Computer-assisted survey information collection, edited by M. P. Couper, R. P. Baker, J. Bethlehem, C. Z. Clark, J. Martin, W. L. Nicholls II, and J. M. O'Reilly, 583-604. New York: John Wiley.
3.
Beckenbach, A. 1995. Computer assisted questioning: The new survey methods in the perception of the respondent. Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique48:82-100.
4.
Catania, J. A., D. R. Gibson, D. D. Chitwood, and T. J. Coates. 1990. Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: Influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior. Psychological Bulletin108:339-362.
5.
Clayton, R. L., and G. S. Werking. 1998. Business surveys of the future: The World Wide Web as a data collection methodology. In Computer-assisted survey information collection, edited by M. P. Couper, R. P. Baker, J. Bethlehem, C. Z. Clark, J. Martin, W. L. Nicholls II, and J. M. O'Reilly, 543-562. New York: John Wiley.
6.
Couper, M. P. 2000. Web surveys: A review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly64:464-494.
7.
Couper, M. P., R. P. Baker, J. Bethlehem, C. Z. Clark, J. Martin, W. L. Nicholls II, and J. M. O'Reilly, eds. 1998. Computer-assisted survey information collection. New York: John Wiley.
8.
Couper, M. P., J. Blair, and T. Triplett. 1999. A comparison of mail and e-mail for a survey of employees in federal statistical agencies. Journal of Official Statistics15:39-56.
9.
Couper, M. P., and W. L. Nicholls, II. 1998. The history and development of computer assisted survey information collection methods. In Computer-assisted survey information collection, edited by M. P. Couper, R. P. Baker, J. Bethlehem, C. Z. Clark, J. Martin, W. L. Nicholls II, and J. M. O'Reilly, 1-22. New York: John Wiley.
10.
Crawford, S. 2002. Evaluation of Web survey data collection systems. Field Methods14 (3): 307-321.
11.
de Leeuw, E. D. 1992. Data quality in mail, telephone and face-to-face surveys. Amsterdam: TT-publikaties.
12.
de Leeuw, E. D. 2002. The effect of computer-assisted interviewing on data quality. A review of the evidence [CD-ROM]. In Social science methodology in the new millennium, edited by J. Blasius, J. Hox, E. de Leeuw, and P. Schmidt. Leverkusen, Germany: Leske and Budrich.
13.
de Leeuw, E. D., and M. Collins. 1997. Data collection method and survey quality: An overview. In Survey measurement and process quality, edited by L. Lyberg, P. Biemer, M. Collins, C. Dippo, E. de Leeuw, N. Schwarz, and D. Trewin, 199-220. New York: John Wiley.
14.
de Leeuw, E. D., J. J. Hox, and G. Snijkers. 1995. The effect of computer-assisted interviewing on data quality. A review. Journal of the Market Research Society37 (4): 325-344.
15.
de Leeuw, E. D., and W. L. Nicholls, II. 1996. Technological innovations in data collection: Acceptance, data quality, and costs. Sociological Research Online1 (4). Available at http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/1/4/leeuw.html.
16.
de Leeuw, E. D., W. L. Nicholls, II, S. H. Andrews, and T. L. Mesenbourg. 2000. The use of old and new data collection methods in establishment surveys. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on methodological issues in official statistics. Stockholm: SCB. Available at http://www.scb.se/omscb/off_stat/conference.asp.
17.
Dillman, D. A. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: John Wiley.
18.
Dillman, D. A. 2000. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley.
19.
Dumas, J. S., and J. C. Redish. 1994. A practical guide to usability testing. Series in human/computer interaction, American Institute for Research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
20.
Forsyth, B. H., and J. T. Lessler. 1991. Cognitive laboratory methods: A taxonomy. In Measurement errors in surveys, edited by P. P. Biemer, R. M. Groves, L. E. Lyberg, N. A. Mathiowetz, and S. Sudman, 393-418. New York: John Wiley.
21.
Fowler, F. J. 1995. Improving survey questions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Gravlee, C. C. 2002. Mobile computer-assisted personal interviewing with handheld computers: The Entryware system 3.0. Field Methods14 (3): 322-336.
23.
Harrel, T. H., and T. A. Lombardo. 1984. Validation of an automated 16PF administration procedure. Journal of Personality Assessment48:216-227.
24.
Heberlein, T. A., and R. Baumgartner. 1978. Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature. American Sociological Review43:447-462.
25.
Higgins, C. A., T. P. Dimnik, and H. P. Greenwood. 1987. The DISQ survey method. Journal of the Market Research Society29:437-445.
26.
Hochstim, J. R. 1967. A critical comparison of three strategies of collecting data from households. Journal of the American Statistical Association62:976-989.
27.
Johnston, J., and C. Walton. 1995. Reducing response effects for sensitive questions: A computer assisted self-interview with audio. Social Science Computer Review13:304-319.
28.
Kef, S. 1999. Outlook on relations. Personal networks and psychosocial characteristics of visually impaired adolescents. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis.
29.
Kef, S. 2000. Report on pilot study: Deviant adolescents and their parents. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
30.
Kinsey, S. H., and D. M. Jewell. 1998. A systematic approach to instrument development in CAI. In Computer-assisted survey information collection, edited by M. P. Couper, R. P. Baker, J. Bethlehem, C. Z. Clark, J. Martin, W. L. Nicholls II, and J. M. O'Reilly, 105-123. New York: John Wiley.
31.
Kwak, N., and B. Radler. 2002. A comparison between mail and Web surveys: Response pattern, respondent profile, and data quality. Journal of Official Statistics18:257-273.
32.
Lee, R. M. 1993. Doing research on sensitive topics. London: Sage.
33.
Mead, A. D., and F. Drasgow. 1993. Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin114:449-458.
34.
Nicholls, W. L., II, R. P. Baker, and J. Martin. 1997. The effect of new data collection technologies on survey data quality. In Survey measurement and process quality, edited by L. Lyberg, P. Biemer, M. Collins, C. Dippo, E. de Leeuw, N. Schwarz, and D. Trewin, 221-248. New York: John Wiley.
35.
O'Reilly, J. M., M. L. Hubbard, J. T. Lessler, P. P. Biemer, and C. F. Turner. 1994. Audio and video computer assisted self-interviewing: Preliminary tests of new technologies for data collection. Journal of Official Statistics10:197-214.
36.
Parks, B. T., D. E. Mead, and B. L. Johnson. 1985. Validation of a computer administered marital adjustment test. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy11:207-210.
37.
Ramos, M., B. M. Sedivi, and E. M. Sweet. 1998. Computerized self-administered questionnaires. In Computer-assisted survey information collection, edited by M. P. Couper, R. P. Baker, J. Bethlehem, C. Z. Clark, J. Martin, W. L. Nicholls II, and J. M. O'Reilly, 389-408. New York: John Wiley.
38.
Richman, W. L., S. Kiesler, S. Weisband, and F. Drasgow. 1999. A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology84 (5): 754-775.
39.
Saltzman, A. 1993. Improving response rates in disk-by-mail surveys. Marketing Research5:32-39.
40.
Samuels, J. 1994. From CAPI to HAPPI: A scenario for the future and its implications for research. Proceedings of the 1994 ESOMAR congress: Applications of new technologies. Amsterdam: Esomar.
41.
Saris, W. E. 1998. Ten years of interviewing without interviewers: The telepanel. In Computer-assisted survey information collection, edited by M. P. Couper, R. P. Baker, J. Bethlehem, C. Z. Clark, J. Martin, W. L. Nicholls II, and J. M. O'Reilly, 409-429. New York: John Wiley.
42.
Sawtooth. 1994. CI3 user manual. Evanston, IL: Sawtooth Software.
43.
Schaefer, D. R., and D. A. Dillman. 1998. Development of a standard e-mail methodology: Results from an experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly62:378-397.
44.
Schwarz, N., F. Strack, H.-J. Hippler, and G. Bishop. 1991. The impact of administration mode on response effects in survey measurement. Applied Cognitive Psychology5:193-212.
45.
Scott, J. 1997. Children as respondents: Methods for improving data quality. In Survey measurement and process quality, edited by L. Lyberg, P. Biemer, M. Collins, C. Dippo, E. de Leeuw, N. Schwarz, and D. Trewin, 331-350. New York: JohnWiley.
46.
Siemiatycki, J. 1979. A comparison of mail, telephone, and home interview strategies for household health surveys. American Journal of Public Health69:238-245.
47.
Sikkel, D. 1998. The individual interview. In Computer-assisted survey information collection, edited by M. P. Couper, R. P. Baker, J. Bethlehem, C. Z. Clark, J. Martin, W. L. Nicholls II, and J. M. O'Reilly, 147-166. New York: John Wiley.
48.
Snijkers, G. J. M. E. 2002. Cognitive laboratory experiences: On pretesting, computerised questionnaires and data quality. Ph.D. diss., University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
49.
Sudman, S., and N. M. Bradburn. 1974. Response effects in surveys: A review and synthesis. Chicago: Aldine.
50.
Thornberry, J., B. Bhaskar, B. Wesley, C. J. Krulewitch, B. Wesley, M. L. Hubbard, A. Das, L. Foudin, and M. Adamson. 2002. Audio computerized self-report interview use in prenatal clinics: Audio computer assisted self-interview with touch screen to detect alcohol consumption in pregnant women application of a new technology to an old problem. Computer Information Nursing20:46-52.
51.
Tourangeau, R., and T. W. Smith. 1996. Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection, question format, and question context. Public Opinion Quarterly60:275-304.
52.
Trochim, W. M. K. 1989. An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning12:1-16.
53.
Turner, C. F., B. H. Forsyth, J. M. O'Reilly, P. C. Cooley, T. K. Smith, S. M. Rogers, and H. G. Miller. 1998. Automated self-interviewing and the survey measurement of sensitive behaviour. In Computer-assisted survey information collection, edited by M. P. Couper, R. P. Baker, J. Bethlehem, C. Z. Clark, J. Martin, W. L. Nicholls II, and J. M. O'Reilly, 455-473. New York: John Wiley.
54.
Turner, C. F., J. T. Lessler, and J. W. Devore. 1992. Effects of mode of administration and wording on reporting of drug use. In Survey measurement of drug use: Methodological studies, edited by C. F. Turner, J. T. Lessler, and J. C. Gfroerer, 177-220. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
55.
Van Hattum, M. J. C, and E. D. de Leeuw. 1999. A disk-by-mail survey of pupils in primary schools: Data quality and logistics. Journal of Official Statistics15:413-429.
Witt, K. J., and S. Bernstein. 1992. Best practices in disk-by-mail surveys. Proceedings of the 1992 Sawtooth Conference. Evanston, IL: Sawtooth Software.
58.
Zandan, P., and L. Frost. 1989. Customer satisfaction research using disk-by-mail. Proceedings of the 1989 Sawtooth Conference. Evanston, IL: Sawtooth Software.
