Citizens usually participate in two ways in politics: conventional and unconventional political action. The latter type covers a wide range of behaviors that do not conform to the rules defined under a specific regime. Among the most significant unconventional expressions are the signing of petitions, boycotts, legal demonstrations, illegal strikes, and the occupation of buildings. In this article, the psychometric properties of a scale to measure unconventional political action in Spain are assessed. This scale was included in the last World Values Survey (of 1995-1996). The sample used in that survey contained 6,920 persons in Spain. The data from Spain are analyzed for the country as a whole and by region. Reliability, as indicated by Cronbach's alpha, is acceptable, and construct validity (tested with a principal components analysis, a differential study, and a correlational study) supports the use of the scale to differentiate persons in unconventional political action.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramson, P. R., and R. Inglehart. 1995. Value change in global perspective. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
2.
Almond, G. A., and S. Verba. 1963. The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
Almond, G. A., and S. Verba. 1990. The civic culture revisited. Boston: Little, Brown.
4.
Análisis Sociológico Económico y Político. 1999. Encuesta mundial de valores 1995-96. CD-ROM. Madrid: Análisis Sociológico Económico y Político.
5.
Andrich, D. 1978a. Application of a psychometric rating model to ordered categories which are scored with successive integers. Applied Psychological Measurement2 (4): 581-594.
6.
Andrich, D. 1978b. A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika43:561-573.
7.
Barnes, S. H., and M. Kaase. 1979. Political action: Mass participation in five Western democracies. London: Sage.
8.
Carmines, E. G., and R. A. Zeller. 1979. Reliability and validity assessment. London: Sage.
9.
Centre for Research on Social Reality. 1992. La realidad social en España 1990-91. Madrid, Spain: Coedición Fundación BBV.
10.
Centre for Research on Social Reality. 1993. La realidad social en España 1991-92. Madrid, Spain: Coedición Fundación BBV.
11.
Centre for Research on Social Reality. 1994. La realidad social en España 1992-93. Madrid, Spain: Coedición Fundación BBV.
12.
Centre for Research on Social Reality. 1995. La realidad social en España 1993-94. Madrid, Spain: Coedición Fundación BBV.
13.
Dalton, R. J. 1988. Citizen politics in Western democracies: Public opinion and political parties in the United States, Great Britain, West Germany and France. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
14.
Finkel, S. E., and K. D. Opp. 1991. Party identification and participation in collective political action. Journal of Politics53:339-371.
15.
Garmendia, F., N. Larrañaga, and E. Buenetxea. 1996. Política y valores en la sociedad vasca. In Los valores en la comunidad autónoma del País Vasco y Navarra. Su evolución en los años 1990-1995, edited by J. Elzo, 199-253. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain: Servicio Central de Publicaciones del Gobierno Vasco.
16.
Gibson, J. L. 1997. Mass opposition to the Soviet putsch of August 1991: Collective action, rational choice, and democratic values in the former Soviet Union. American Political Science Review91:671-684.
17.
Inglehart, R. 1977. The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
Inglehart, R. 1990. Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
Inglehart, R. 1997. Modernization and postmodernization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Inglehart, R., M. Basáñez, and A. Moreno. 1998. Human values and beliefs. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
21.
Kaiser, H. F. 1974. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika39:31-36.
22.
Marsh, A. 1977. Protest and political consciousness. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23.
Maslow, A. K. 1954. Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.
24.
Masters, G. N. 1980. A Rasch model for rating scales. Dissertation Abstracts International41:215A-216A.
25.
McCarthy, J. D., and M. N. Zald. 1977. Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology82:1212-1241.
26.
Melucci, A. 1996. Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Morán, M. L., and J. Benedicto. 1995. La cultura política de los españoles. Un ensayo de reinterpretación. Madrid, Spain: CIS.
28.
Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric theory. 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29.
Offe, C. 1985. New social movements: Challenging the boundaries of institutional politics. Social Research52:117-167.
30.
Offe, C. 1990. Reflections on the institutional self-transformation of movement politics: A tentative stage model. In Challenging the political order: New social and political movements in Western democracies, edited by R. J. Dalton and M. Kuechler, 232-250. New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
Pierce, R., and P. Converse. 1990. Attitudinal sources of protest behaviour in France: Differences between before and after measurement. Public Opinion Quarterly54:295-316.
32.
Reckase, M. D. 1979. Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implications. Journal of Educational Statistics4:207-230.
33.
Rojas, A. 1999. Application of rating scale model for measurement of “unconventional political action” (in Spanish). Metodología de Encuestas1 (1): 1-18.
34.
Rucht, D. 1990. The strategies and action repertoires of new movements. In Challenging the political order: New social and political movements in Western democracies, edited by R. J. Dalton and M. Kuechler, 156-175. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Tarrow, S. 1988. National politics and collective action: Recent theory and research in Western Europe and the U.S. Annual Review of Sociology14:421-440.
36.
Wright, B. D., and J. M. Linacre. 1992. A user's guide to BIGSTEPS. Chicago: Mesa Press.
37.
Wright, B. D., and G. N. Masters. 1982. Rating scale analysis. Chicago: MESA Press.
