This article reviews the workings of the U.S. Freedom of Information Act, looks at its use by social scientists, and examines some of the implications of the U.S. experience for researchers interested in using freedom of information legislation in their own countries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, A. R.1987. Using the Freedom of Information Act: A step by step guide. New York: ACLU Foundation.
2.
Adler, A. R.1991. Litigation under the federal Open Government Laws. Washington, DC: American Civil Liberties Union Foundation.
3.
Aid, M. M.1998. “Not so anonymous”: Parting the veil of secrecy about the National Security Agency. In A culture of secrecy: The government versus the people's right to know, edited by A. G. Theoharis, 60–82. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
4.
Calavita, K.1992. Inside the state: The Bracero Program, immigration, and the I.N.S. New York: Routledge.
5.
Cappell, C. L., and T. M. Guterbock. 1992. Visible colleges: The social and conceptual structure of sociological specialties. American Sociological Review57 (2): 266–273.
6.
Charns, A., and P. M. Green. 1998. Playing the information game: How it took thirteen years and two lawsuits to get J. Edgar Hoover's secret Supreme Court sex files. In A culture of secrecy: The government versus the people's right to know, edited by A. G. Theoharis, 97–114. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
7.
Coleman, K. M., and L. Seligman. 1988. The 1985 USIA Central American surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly52:552–556.
8.
Dempsey, J. X.1998. The CIA and secrecy. In A culture of secrecy: The government versus the people's right to know, edited by A. G. Theopharis, 37–59. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
9.
Diamond, S.1992. Compromised campus: The collaboration of universities with the intelligence community. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Diamond, S.1993. Compromising American Studies programs and survey research. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society6 (3): 409–415.
11.
Douglas, J. D.1976. Investigative social research: Individual and team field research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
Ennis, J. G.1992. The social organization of sociological knowledge: Modeling the intersection of specialties. American Sociological Review57 (2): 259–265.
13.
Fuller, L.1988. Fieldwork in forbidden terrain: The U.S. state and the case of Cuba. American Sociologist19 (1): 99–120.
14.
Garfinkel, H.1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.
Goyder, J.1987. The silent minority: Nonrespondents on sample surveys. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
16.
Hakim, C.1983. Research based on administrative records. Sociological Review31 (3): 489–519.
17.
Hernandez, D. G.1996. Dealing with the FOI crunch. Editor and Publisher129 (August): 14–14.
18.
Hill, M. R.1993. Archival strategies and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
Hulihan, M.1983. The Freedom of Information Act. In The reporter's handbook: An investigative guide to documents and techniques, edited by J. Ullmann and S. Honeygan, 80–87. New York: St. Martin's.
20.
Janowitz, M.1972. Professionalization of sociology. American Journal of Sociology78 (1): 105–135.
21.
Keen, M. F.1992. The Freedom of Information Act and sociological research. American Sociologist23 (2): 43–51.
22.
Keen, M. F.1993. No-one above suspicion: Talcott Parsons under surveillance. American Sociologist24 (3): 37–54.
23.
Keen, M. F.1999. Stalking the sociological imagination: J. Edgar Hoover's FBI surveillance of American sociology. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
24.
Kessler, R.1993. The FBI. New York: Pocket Books.
25.
Lee, R. M.1993. Doing research on sensitive topics. London: Sage.
26.
Lee, R. M.2000. Unobtrusive methods in social research. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
27.
Lindner, R.1996. The reportage of urban culture: Robert Park and the Chicago School. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Lipset, S. M., and E. C. Ladd. 1972. The politics of American sociologists. American Journal of Sociology78 (1): 67–104.
29.
Marx, G. T.1972. Introduction. In Muckraking sociology: Research as social criticism, edited by G. T. Marx, 1–29. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
30.
Marx, G. T.1980. The new police undercover work. Urban Life8:399–446.
31.
Marx, G. T.1984. Notes on the discovery, collection and assessment of hidden and dirty data. In Studies in the sociology of social problems, edited by J. W. Schneider and J. I. Kitsuse, 78–113. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
32.
Mullins, N. C.1973. Theories and theory groups in contemporary American sociology. New York: Harper & Row.
33.
Nelson, A. K.1998. The John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Review Board. In A culture of secrecy: The government versus the people's right to know, edited by A. G. Theoharis, 211–232. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
34.
Noakes, J. A.1995. Using FBI files for historical sociology. Qualitative Sociology18 (3): 271–286.
35.
Pendakur, M.1985. Dynamics of cultural policy: The U.S. film industry in India. Journal of Communication35:52–72.
36.
Pratt, W. C.1992. Using FBI records in writing regional labor history. Labor History33 (4): 470–482.
37.
Price, D. H.1997. Anthropological research and the Freedom of Information Act. Cultural Anthropology Methods Journal9 (1): 12–15.
38.
Price, D. H.1998. Gregory Bateson and the OSS: World War II and Bateson's assessment of applied anthropology. Human Organization57 (4): 379–384.
39.
Relyea, H. C.1987. Public access through the Freedom of Information and Privacy Acts. In Federal information policies in the 1980s: Conflicts and issues, edited by P. Hernon and C. R. McClure, 52–82. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
40.
Rosswurm, S., and T. Gilpin. 1986. The FBI and farm equipment workers: FBI surveillance records as a source for CIO union history. Labor History27:485–505.
41.
Sechrest, L., and M. Phillips. 1979. Unobtrusive measures: An overview. In Unobtrusive measurement today, edited by L. Sechrest, 1–31. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42.
Simmel, G.1906. The sociology of secrecy and secret societies. American Journal of Sociology11:441–498.
43.
Simpson, C.1994. Science of coercion: Communication research and psychological warfare, 1945–60. New York: Oxford University Press.
44.
Snell, R. 2000. The Kiwi paradox: A comparison of freedom of information in Australia and New Zealand [Online]. Available: http://law.anu.edu.au/publications/flr/vol28no3/snell.htm
45.
Theoharis, A. G.1998. The Freedom of Information Act versus the FBI. In A culture of secrecy: The government versus the people's right to know, edited by A. G. Theoharis, 16–36. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
46.
Webb, E. J., D. T. Campbell, R. D. Schwartz, and L. Sechrest. 1966. Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.
47.
Webb, E. J., D. T. Campbell, R. D. Schwartz, L. Sechrest, and J. B. Grove. 1981. Nonreactive measures in the social sciences. Dallas, TX: Houghton Mifflin.
48.
Wells, R. H., and J. S. Picou. 1981. American sociology: Theoretical and methodological structure. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
49.
Wiener, J.1998. “National security” and freedom of information: The John Lennon FBI files. In A culture of secrecy: The government versus the people's right to know, edited by A. G. Theoharis, 83–96. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
