Another Complex Step: A Model of Heroin Experimentation

Abstract

In a recent article in this journal, the author explored complexity theory as a potential resource for anthropological research, using ongoing research on heroin trends as the example. In this article, the research on trends among a sample of youth in Baltimore County is again used. A preliminary computer simulation of the research results is reported. The simulation was written in the Starlogo language, a language designed to introduce agent-based modeling. The results show that key elements of the explanation of experimentation can be modeled and that the outcomes show potential use in intervention as well as validation of the anthropological research. However, the exercise also reveals limits of the model and problems in translation into the programming language.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agar, M. H. 1999. Complexity theory: An exploration and overview based on John Holland's work. Field Methods 11:99–120.

Agar, M. H. , and H. S. Reisinger . 2000. Explaining drug trends: Heroin use in Baltimore County. In Illicit drugs: Patterns of use—Patterns of response, edited by A. Springer and A. Uhl , 143–166. Innsbruck, Austria: Studienverlag.

Agar, M. H., and H. S. Reisinger. Forthcoming. A heroin epidemic at the intersection of histories. Medical Anthropology.

Ashby, W. R. 1963. An introduction to cybernetics. New York: Wiley.

Axelrod, R. 1997. The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bateson, G. 1936. Naven. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Byrne, D. 1998. Complexity theory and the social sciences. London: Routledge.

Cilliers, P. 1998. Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. London: Routledge.

Epstein, J. M. , and R. Axtell . 1996. Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

10.

Erickson, P. G. , E. M. Adlaf , R. G. Smart , and G. F. Murray . 1994. The steel drug: Cocaine and crack in perspective. 2d ed. New York: Lexington Books.

11.

Giddens, A. 1979. Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.

12.

Gupta, A. , and J. Ferguson , eds. 1997. Anthropological locations: Boundaries and grounds of a field science. Berkeley: University of California Press.

13.

Holland, J. H. 1995. Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Reading, MA: Perseus.

14.

Holland, J. H. 1998. Emergence: From chaos to order. Reading, MA: Helix.

15.

Kohler, T. 1995. Agent-based modeling of Anasazi village formation in the Northern American Southwest [Online]. Available: www.santafe.edu/projects/swarm/users/pages/village/0toc.html

16.

Parker, H. , J. Aldridge , and F. Measham . 1998. Illegal leisure: The normalization of adolescent recreational drug use. London: Routledge.

17.

Patton, M. Q. 1999. Comment on Agar: How long will the rose of complexity theory bloom? Field Methods 11:121–123.

18.

Rapoport, A. , and A. W. Chammah . 1965. Prisoner's dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

19.

Rapoport, R. A. 1967. Pigs for the ancestors. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

20.

Resnick, M. 1997. Turtles, termites, and traffic jams: Explorations in massively parallel microworlds. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

21.

Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of innovation. 4th ed. New York: The Free Press.

22.

Sahlins, M. D. 1981. Historical metaphors and mythical realities: Structure in the early history of the Sandwich Islands kingdom. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

23.

Wolf, E. R. 1999. Envisioning power: Ideologies of dominance and crisis. Berkeley: University of California Press.