The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive view of the case study process from the researcher's perspective, emphasizing methodological considerations. As opposed to other qualitative or quantitative research strategies, such as grounded theory or surveys, there are virtually no specific requirements guiding case research. This is both the strength and the weakness of this approach. It is a strength because it allows tailoring the design and data collection procedures to the research questions. On the other hand, this approach has resulted in many poor case studies, leaving it open to criticism, especially from the quantitative field of research. This article argues that there is a particular need in case studies to be explicit about the methodological choices one makes. This implies discussing the wide range of decisions concerned with design requirements, data collection procedures, data analysis, and validity and reliability. The approach here is to illustrate these decisions through a particular case study of two mergers in the financial industry in Norway.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, P. A., and P. Adler. 1994. Observational techniques. In Handbook of qualitative research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 377–392. London: Sage.
2.
Andersen, S. S.1997. Case-studier og generalisering: Forskningsstrategi og design (Case studies and generalization: Research strategy and design). Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.
3.
Blake, R. R., and J. S. Mounton. 1985. How to achieve integration on the human side of the merger. Organizational Dynamics13 (3): 41–56.
4.
Bryman, A., and R. G. Burgess. 1999. Qualitative research. London: Sage.
5.
Buono, A. F., and J. L. Bowditch. 1989. The human side of mergers and acquisitions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Cartwright, S., and C. L. Cooper. 1993. The psychological impact of mergers and acquisitions on the individual: A study of building society managers. Human Relations46 (3): 327–347.
7.
Cassell, C., and G. Symon, eds. 1994. Qualitative methods in organizational research: A practical guide. London: Sage.
8.
Cook, T. D., and D. T. Campbell. 1979. Quasi experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
9.
Crabtree, B. F., and W. L. Miller. 1992. Primary care research: A multimethod typology and qualitative road map. In Doing qualitative research: Methods for primary care, edited by B. F. Crabtree and W. L. Miller, 3–28. Vol. 3. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Creswell, J. W.1998. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Denzin, N. K., and L. S. Lincoln. 2000. Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.
12.
Eisenhardt, K. M.1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review14 (4): 532–550.
13.
Flick, U.1998. An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage.
14.
George, A. L.1979. Case studies and theory development: The method of structured, focused comparison. In Diplomacy: New approaches in history, theory, and policy, edited by P. G. Lauren, 43–68. New York: Free Press.
15.
Gioia, D. A., and K. Chittipeddi. 1991. Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal12:433–448.
16.
Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
17.
Glick, W. H, G. P. Huber, C. C. Miller, D. H. Doty, and K. M. Sutcliffe. 1990. Studying changes in organizational design and effectiveness: Retrospective event histories and periodic assessments. Organization Science1 (3): 293–312.
Hakim, C.1987. Research design. Strategies and choices in the design of social research. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
20.
Hamel, J., S. Dufour, and D. Fortin. 1993. Case study methods. London: Sage.
21.
Hartley, J. F.1994. Case studies in organizational research. In Qualitative methods in organizational research: A practical guide, edited by C. Cassell and G. Symon, 209–229. London: Sage.
22.
Haspeslaph, P., and D. B. Jemison. 1991. The challenge of renewal through acquisitions. Planning Review19 (2): 27–32.
23.
King, N.1994. The qualitative research interview. In Qualitative methods in organizational research: A practical guide, edited by C. Cassell and G. Symon, 14–36. London: Sage.
24.
Kirk, J., and M. L. Miller. 1986. Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research Methods Series 1. London: Sage.
25.
Leonard-Barton, D.1990. A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organization Science1 (3): 248–266.
26.
Marshall, C., and G. B. Rossman. 1999. Designing qualitative research. London: Sage.
27.
Maxwell, J. A.1992. Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review62 (3): 279–299.
28.
Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis. 2d ed.London: Sage.
29.
Mitchell, J. C.1983. Case and situation analysis. Sociology Review51 (2): 187–211.
30.
Nachmias, C., and D. Nachmias. 1981. Research methods in the social sciences. London: Edward Arnhold.
31.
Pettigrew, A. M.1990. Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science1 (3): 267–292.
32.
Pettigrew, A. M.1992. The character and significance of strategic process research. Strategic Management Journal13:5–16.
33.
Rossman, G. B., and S. F. Rallis. 1998. Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Schramm, W.1971. Notes on case studies for instructional media projects. Working paper for Academy of Educational Development, Washington DC.
35.
Schweiger, D. M., and J. P. Walsh. 1990. Mergers and acquisitions: An interdisciplinary view. In Research in personnel and human resource management, edited by G. R. Ferris and K. M. Rowland, 41–107. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
36.
Silverman, D.2000. Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: Sage.
37.
Stake, R. E.1995. The art of case study research. London: Sage.
38.
Strauss, A. L., and J. Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
Sykes, W.1990. Validity and reliability in qualitative market research: A review of the literature. Journal of the Market Research Society32 (3): 289–328.
40.
Waddington, D.1994. Participant observation. In Qualitative methods in organizational research, edited by C. Cassell and G. Symon, 107–122. London: Sage.
41.
Yin, R. K.1989. Case study research: Design and methods. Applied Social Research Series, Vol. 5. London: Sage.
42.
Yin, R. K.1993. Applications of case study research. Applied Social Research Series, Vol. 34. London: Sage.
