Participant observation (PO) is one of the more fruitful methodological approaches to studying crowd behavior. This article argues that, since crowd behavior characteristically takes place in a context of intergroup conflict, PO may involve having to take sides to gather data. Possible sources of bias within a partisan PO framework are examined, including bias in access, in observation, and in analysis. Two examples vof partisan research on crowd conflict—a demonstration riot and an antiroads occupation—show that only the first of these forms of bias is unavoidable. However, it is posited that limited access to one of the groups in conflict is more than offset by the quality and quantity of data gathered from the other group and the subsequent objectivity this affords within the data analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, R.1994. Prison riots in Britain and the USA. 2d ed.London: Macmillan.
2.
Aguilar, J. L.1981. Insider research: An ethnography of a debate. In Anthropologists at home in North America: Methods and issues in the study of one's own society, edited by D. A. Messerschmidt, 1–26. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Altorki, S.
, and C. F. El-Sohl. 1988. Introduction. In Arab women in the field: Studying your own society, edited by S. Altorki and C. F. El-Sohl, 1–23. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
4.
Armstrong, G.1993. Like that Desmond Morris? In Interpreting the field: Accounts of ethnography, edited by D. Hobbs and T. May, 3–43. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5.
Barrows, S.1980. Distorting mirrors. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6.
Benewick, R.
, and R. Holton. 1987. The peaceful crowd: Crowd solidarity and the Pope's visit to Britain. In The crowd in contemporary Britain, edited by G. Gaskell and R. Benewick, 200–211. London: Sage.
7.
Benford, R. D.
, and S. A. Hunt. 1995. Dramaturgy and social movements: The social construction and communication of power. In Social movements: Critiques, concepts, case studies, edited by S. M. Lyman, 84–109. London: Macmillan.
8.
Billig, M.1995. Rhetorical psychology, ideological thinking and imagining nationhood. In Social movements and culture, edited by H. Johnston and B. Klandermans, 64–81. London: UCL Press.
9.
Brent, J. 1992. The battle of Golden Hill: Narrative, identity and community in middle-class protest. Master's thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
10.
Cannavale, F. J.
, H. A. Scarr, and A. Pepitone. 1970. De-individuation in the small group: Some further evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology16:141–147.
11.
Cronin, P. 1995. Crowds: The police perspective. Bachelor's thesis, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
12.
Della Porta, D.1992. Life histories in the analysis of social movement activists. In Studying collective action, edited by M. Diani and R. Eyerman, 168–193. London: Sage.
13.
Denzin, N. K.1989. The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. 3d ed.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14.
Diener, E.1980. Deindividuation: The absence of self-awareness and self-regulation in group members. In Psychology of group influence, edited by P. B. Paulus, 209–242. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Drury, J.1994. Cognitive science and hermeneutic explanation: Symbiotic or incompatible frameworks?Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology1:40–50.
16.
Drury, J. 1996. Collective action and psychological change. Ph.D. diss., University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
17.
Drury, J.
, and S. Reicher. 2000. Collective action and psychological change: The emergence of new social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology39:579–604.
18.
Edwards, D.
, and J. Potter. 1992. Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
19.
Fahim, H.
, and K. Helmer. 1982. Themes and counterthemes: The Burg Wartenstein Symposium. In Indigenous anthropology in non-Western countries: Proceedings of a Burg Wartenstein symposium, edited by H. Fahim, i–xiv. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
20.
Fantasia, R.1988. Cultures of solidarity: Consciousness, action, and contemporary American workers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
Fantasia, R.
, and E. L. Hirsch. 1995. Culture in rebellion: The appropriation and transformation of the veil in the Algerian revolution. In Social movements and culture, edited by H. Johnston and B. Klandermans, 144–159. London: UCL Press.
22.
Festinger, L.
, A. Pepitone, and T. Newcomb. 1952. Some consequences of de-individuation in a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology47:382–389.
23.
Glaser, B.
, and A. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
24.
Green, P.1990. The enemy without: Policing and class consciousness in the miners' strike. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
25.
Green, P.1993. Taking sides: Partisan research in the 1984–1985 miners' strike. In Interpreting the field: Accounts of ethnography, edited by D. Hobbs and T. May, 99–119. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26.
Grice, P.1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Habermas, J.1971. Knowledge and human interests. Translated by J. J. Shapiro. Boston: Beacon Press.
28.
Hammersley, M.
, and P. Atkinson. 1995. Ethnography: Principles in practice. 2d ed.London: Routledge.
29.
Hirsch, E. L.1990. Sacrifice for the cause: Group processes, recruitment, and commitment in a student social movement. American Sociological Review55:243–254.
30.
Humphreys, L.1970. Tearoom trade: A study of homosexual encounters in public places. London: Duckworth.
31.
Johnston, H.
, and B. Klandermans. 1995. The cultural analysis of social movements. In Social movements and culture, edited by H. Johnston and B. Klandermans, 3–24. London: UCL Press.
32.
Jorgensen, D. L.1989. Participant observation: A methodology for human studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33.
Kellehear, A.1993. The unobtrusive researcher. St. Leonards, New South Wales: Allen & Unwin.
34.
Klandermans, B.1992. The case for longitudinal research on movement participation. In Studying collective action, edited by M. Diani and R. Eyerman, 55–75. London: Sage.
35.
Kriesi, H.1992. The rebellion of the research “objects.” In Studying collective action, edited by M. Diani and R. Eyerman, 55–75. London: Sage.
36.
Kriesi, H.
, R. Koopmans, J. W. Dyvendak, and M. G. Giugni. 1995. New social movements in western Europe. London: UCL Press.
37.
McAdam, D.1982. Political process and the development of black insurgency 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
McKinney, J. C.1966. Constructive typology and social theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
39.
Melucci, A.1995. The process of collective identity. In Social movements and culture, edited by H. Johnston and B. Klandermans, 41–63. London: UCL Press.
40.
Messerschmidt, D. A.1981. On anthropology “at home.” In Anthropologists at home in North America: Methods and issues in the study of one's own society, edited by D. A. Messerschmidt, 3–14. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Miles, M. B.
, and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis. An expanded source book. 2d ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
Milgram, S.
, and H. Toch. 1969. Collective behavior: Crowds and social movements. In The handbook of social psychology, vol. 4, 2d ed., edited by G. Lindzey and E. Aronson, 507–610. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
43.
Naples, N. A.1996. The outsider phenomenon. In In the field: Readings on the field research experience, edited by C. D. Smith and W. Kornblum, 139–149. Westport, CT: Praeger.
44.
Parker, I.1993. Reflexive research: Grounded in what? Paper presented at British Psychological Society Social Psychology Section Conference, September, at Jesus College, Oxford, UK.
45.
Prentice-Dunn, S.
, and R. W. Rogers. 1989. Deindividuation and the self-regulation of behavior. In Psychology of group influence. 2d ed., edited by P. B. Paulus, 87–109. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
Reicher, S. D. 1983. The determination of collective behaviour. Ph.D. diss., University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
47.
Reicher, S. D.1984. The St. Paul's riot: An explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model. European Journal of Social Psychology14:1–21.
48.
Reicher, S. D.1987. Crowd behaviour as social action. In Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory, by J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, and M. S. Wetherell, 171–202. Oxford: Blackwell.
49.
Reicher, S. D.1996. “The Battle of Westminster”: Developing the social identity model of crowd behaviour in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology26:115–134.
50.
Reicher, S. D.
Forthcoming. The psychology of crowd dynamics. In The Blackwell handbook of social psychology, edited by M. Hogg and R. S. Tindale. Oxford: Blackwell.
51.
Reicher, S. D.
, and M. Levine. 1994. De-individuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the outgroup. British Journal of Social Psychology33:145–163.
52.
Rowan, J.1974. Research as intervention. In Reconstructing social psychology, edited by N. Armistead, 86–100. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
53.
Spears, R.
, M. Lea, and S. Lee. 1990. De-individuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology29:121–134.
54.
Stephenson, J. B.
, and L. S. Greer. 1981. Ethnographers in their own cultures: Two Appalachian cases. Human Organization40:123–130.
55.
Stevenson, J.1987. Sources for the study of recent crowd events. In The crowd in contemporary Britain, edited by G. Gaskell and R. Benewick, 255–266. London: Sage.
56.
Stott, C. J.
, and J. Drury. 1999. The intergroup dynamics of empowerment: A social identity model. In Transforming politics: Power and resistance, edited by P. Bagguley and J. Hearn, 32–45. London: Macmillan.
57.
Stott, C. J.
, and J. Drury. 2000. Crowds, context and identity: Dynamic categorization processes in the “poll tax riot.”Human Relations53:247–273.
58.
Stott, C. J.
, and S. D. Reicher. 1998a. Crowd action as inter-group process: Introducing the police perspective. European Journal of Social Psychology28:509–529.
59.
Stott, C. J.
, and S. D. Reicher. 1998b. How conflict escalates: The inter-group dynamics of collective football crowd “violence.”Sociology32:353–377.
60.
Thomas, J.1993. Doing critical ethnography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
61.
Thompson, P.1978. The voice of the past: Oral history. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
62.
Thompson, E. P.1980. The making of the English working class. 2d ed.Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
63.
Tilly, L. A.
, and C. Tilly, eds. 1981. Class conflict and collective action. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
64.
Turner, J. C.1981. The experimental social psychology of intergroup behaviour. In Intergroup behaviour, edited by J. C. Turner and H. Giles, 66–101. Oxford: Blackwell.
65.
Turner, R. H.
, and L. M. Killian. 1972. Collective behavior. 2d ed.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
66.
Van Ginneken, J.1985. The 1895 debate on the origins of crowd psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences21:375–382.
67.
Waddington, D.1992. Contemporary issues in public disorder: A comparative and historical approach. London: Routledge.
68.
Whyte, W. F.1984. Learning from the field. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
69.
Willis, P.1977. Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. Farnborough, UK: Saxon House.
70.
Wright, S.1978. Crowds and riots: A study in social organization. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
71.
Zimbardo, P. G.1970. The human choice: Individuation, reason and order versus de-individuation, impulse and chaos. In Nebraska symposium on motivation 1969, edited by W. J. Arnold and D. Levine, 237–307. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.
