Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A naturalistic probe of early language content was designed based on the developmental sequence described by Bloom and her colleagues (e.g., Bloom & Lahey, 1978; Lahey, 1988). Thirty-one children, normally-developing and between three and five years of age, were subjects in the study. The productivity of three different strategies for eliciting twenty-seven content categories was tested, and the efficiency of the probe technique was compared with analysis of language samples for content. Results suggest that this nonstandardized, criterion-referenced assessment tool can be combined with standardized testing and language sample analysis to enhance validity, comprehensiveness, and efficiency.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bloom, L. , & Lahey, M. (1978). Language development and language disorders. New York: Wiley.

Connell, P. , & Myles-Zitzer, C. (1982). An analysis of elicited imitation as a language evaluation procedure. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 390-396.

Dailey, K. , & Boxx, J. (1979). A comparison of three imitative tests of expressive language and a spontaneous language sample. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 10, 6-13.

Dore, J. (1974). Pragmatic description of early language development . Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4, 343-350.

Dore, J. (1978). Variation in preschool children's conversational performances. In K. Nelson (Ed.), Children's language: Vol. 1 (pp. 397-444). New York: Gardner Press.

Fujiki, M. , & Brinton, B. (1983). Sampling reliability in elicited imitation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 48, 85-89.

Fujiki, M. , & Brinton, B. (1987). Elicited imitation revisited: A comparison with spontaneous language production. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 18, 301-311.

Hood, L. , & Lightbown, P. (1978). What children do when asked to "say what I say": Does elicited imitation measure linguistic knowledge? Allied Health and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 195-220.

Kramer, C. , James, S. , & Saxman, J. (1979). A comparison of language samples elicited at home and in the clinic. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders , 44, 321-330.

10.

Lahey, M. (1988). Language disorders and language development. New York: Macmillan.

11.

Lahey, M. , Launer, P. , & Schiff-Myers, N. (1983). Prediction of production: Elicited imitation and spontaneous speech productions of language-disordered children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 4, 317-343.

12.

Lund, N.J. , & Duchan, J.F. (1993). Assessing children's language in naturalistic contexts., 3rd ed. New Jersey : Prentice Hall.

13.

Miller, J. (1981 ).Assessing language production in children: Experimental procedures. Baltimore: University Park Press.

14.

Olswang, L. , & Carpenter, R. (1978). Elicitor effects on the language obtained from young language-impaired children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 43, 76-88.

15.

Owens, R.E., Jr. (1992). Language development:An introduction, 3rd ed. New York: Merrill .

16.

Nelson, N.W. (1993). Childhood Language Disorders in Context: Infancy Through Adolescence. New York: Macmillan.

17.

Prutting, C. , Gallagher, T. , & Mulac, A. (1975). Imitation: A closer look. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 41, 412-422.

18.

Scott, C. , & Taylor, A. (1978). A comparison of home- and clinic-gathered language samples. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 43, 482-495.

19.

Winer, B.J. (1962). Statistical principles in experimental design , pp. 319-337, New York: McGraw-Hill.

A Play and Story-Telling Probe for Assessing Early Language Content

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References