In the process of field testing a metalinguistic intervention procedure, unanticipated behaviors were noted. Although these behaviors did not have a statistically significant impact on the results of the original investigation, the children's varied perceptions of specific tasks influenced their performance in important ways. Limitations were noted in a strictly quantitative analysis of the experimental data. Ethnographic techniques were applied to a post-hoc examination of the children's responses. The reflective and qualitative nature of ethnography was used to account for these different perceptions and their impact on the children's behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S.J. (1975). Introduction to qualitative research methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
2.
Cazden, C.B.,John, V.P., & Hymes, D. (Eds.) (1972). Functicns of language in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
3.
Gadlin, H., & Ingle. G. (1975, October). Through the one-way mirror: The limits of experimental self reflection. American Psychologist, 1003-1009.
4.
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
5.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography principles in practice. London: Tavistock Publications.
6.
Maxwell. M. (Ed.) (1985). Special issue on ethnography and education of the deaf. Sign Language Studies, 47,
7.
Prelock, P.A., & Chabon, S.S. (1989), November). 'Meta magic': Trick or treatment for remediation of final consonant deletion. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association .
8.
Prelock, P.A. & Chabon, S.S. (1988, April). Implementing metalinguistic intervention for remediation of final consonant deletion. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the New York State Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
