Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Preschoolers with developmental language disorder may substitute object case pronouns in the subject position of sentences. This study explored whether pronoun case accuracy in spontaneous language samples was associated with the provision of personal pronouns in probes that use structural priming. Seventeen Head Start preschoolers participated. Two categorical measures were calculated based on the absence of spontaneous case errors in 15-min language samples and the presence of personal pronouns in responses to formal priming items on a standardized assessment. Children who produced spontaneous pronoun case errors were less likely to respond to priming with he, she, him, or her in subject position, instead producing lexical noun phrases such as “the boy.” A prerequisite knowledge of English’s case system may be needed for uptake of structural priming in standardized assessments. Preschoolers with immature pronoun case knowledge may not exhibit pronoun case errors during structured formal tasks that rely on priming cues.

Keywords

three to five years language acquisition/development syntax delays/disorders

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ambridge

Pine

J. M.

(2006). Testing the agreement/tense omission model using an elicited imitation paradigm. Journal of Child Language, 33, 879–898. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000906007628

Balason

D. V.

Dollaghan

C. A.

(2002). Grammatical morpheme production in four-year-old children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 961–969. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/078)

Bishop

D. V.

(1994). Grammatical errors in specific language impairment: Competence or performance limitations? Applied Psycholinguistics, 15(4), 507–550. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400006895

Bishop

D. V. M.

(2003). Test for reception of grammar—Version 2 (TROG). Pearson.

Bock

J. K.

Griffin

Z. M.

(2000). The persistence of structure priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.129.2.177

Brown

G. R.

(2017). Pronoun marking in African American English-speaking children with and without specific language impairment (LSU master’s theses 4522). https://repository.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/4522/

Clark

E. V.

(2009). First language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.

Clark

E. V.

Hecht

B. F.

(1982). Learning to coin agent and instrument nouns. Cognition, 12(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(82)90027-0

Craig

H. K.

Washington

J. A.

(2006). Malik goes to school: Examining the language skills of African American students from preschool-5th grade. Psychology Press.

10.

Dawson

Stout

Eyer

(2005). Structured photographic expressive language test-3. PRO-ED.

11.

Fitzgerald

C. E.

(2020). Feature-based classification of pronoun errors: Implications for clinical practice. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 5(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_PERS-19-00067

12.

Fitzgerald

C. E.

Dubasik

V. L.

(in press). Teacher observed social skills of four-year-old children with and without typical language development. Journal of Early Childhood Research. https://doi.10.1177/1476718X251363714

13.

Fitzgerald

C. E.

Rispoli

Hadley

P. A.

(2017). Case marking uniformity in developmental pronoun errors. First Language, 37(4), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723717698007

14.

Grano

(2006). “Me and her” meets “he and I”: Case person, and linear ordering in English coordinated pronouns [Undergraduate Honors Thesis]. Stanford University.

15.

Grinstead

(2021). Interface delay. Journal of Child Language, 48(5), 888–906. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000921000477

16.

Hadley

P. A.

Rispoli

Holt

J. K.

Fitzgerald

Bahnsen

(2014). Growth of finiteness in the third year of life: Replication and predictive validity. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 887–900. https://doi.org/10.1044/2013_JSLHR-L-13-0008

17.

Hadley

P. A.

Walsh

K. M.

(2014). Toy talk: Simple strategies to create richer grammatical input. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 45(3), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_LSHSS-13-0055

18.

Hamilton

M. B.

(2020). An informed lens on African American English. The ASHA Leader, 25(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.FTR1.25012020.46

19.

Heilmann

J. J.

Nockerts

Miller

J. F.

(2010). Language sampling: Does the length of the transcript matter? Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41, 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2009/09-0023)

20.

Huttenlocher

Vasilyeva

Shimpi

(2004). Syntactic priming in young children. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(2), 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2003.09.003

21.

Imgrund

C. M.

Loeb

D. F.

Barlow

S. M.

(2019). Expressive language in preschoolers born preterm: Results of language sample analysis and standardized assessment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(4), 884–895. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-18-0224

22.

Kaiser

A. P.

Cai

Hancock

T. B.

Foster

E. M.

(2002). Teacher-reported behavior problems and language delays in boys and girls enrolled in Head Start. Behavioral Disorders, 28(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290202800103

23.

Kirjavainen

Theakston

Lieven

(2009). Can input explain children’s me-for-I errors? Journal of Child Language, 36, 1091–1114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000909009350

24.

Leonard

L. B.

(2014). Children with specific language impairment. MIT Press.

25.

Leonard

L. B.

Miller

C. A.

Grela

Holland

A. L.

Gerber

Petucci

(2000). Production operations contribute to the grammatical morpheme limitations of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(2), 362–378. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2689

26.

Loeb

D. F.

Leonard

L. B.

(1991). Subject case marking and verb morphology in normally developing and specifically language-impaired children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 34, 340–346. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3402.340

27.

Merrell

A. W.

Plante

(1997). Norm-referenced test interpretation in the diagnostic process. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 28(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.2801.50

28.

Moore

M. E.

(1995). Error analysis of pronouns by normal and language-impaired children. Journal of Communication Disorders, 28(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9924(94)00007-M

29.

Moore

M. E.

(2001). Third person pronoun errors by children with and without language impairment. Journal of Communication Disorders, 34(3), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9924(00)00050-2

30.

Pavelko

S. L.

Owens Jr

R. E.

Ireland

Hahs-Vaughn

D. L.

(2016). Use of language sample analysis by school-based SLPs: Results of a nationwide survey. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 47, 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_LSHSS-15-0044

31.

Pfeiffer

D. L.

Pavelko

S. L.

Hahs-Vaughn

D. L.

Dudding

C. C.

(2019). A national survey of speech-language pathologists’ engagement in interprofessional collaborative practice in schools: Identifying predictive factors and barriers to implementation. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 50, 639–655. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_LSHSS-18-0100

32.

Pindzola

R. H.

Plexico

L. W.

Haynes

W. O.

(2016). Diagnosis and evaluation in speech pathology (9th ed.). Pearson.

33.

Rice

M. L.

Wexler

(2001). Test of early grammatical impairment (TEGI). Pearson.

34.

Rispoli

(2005). When children reach beyond their grasp: Why some children make pronoun case errors and others don’t. Journal of Child Language, 32, 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000904006658

35.

Schaefer

(2023). Between you and I: The emergence of a nominative absolute in English. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21472.76809/3.

36.

Schütze

Wexler

(1996). Subject case licensing and English root infinitives. In Proceedings of the 20th annual Boston University conference on language development, (pp. 2670–2681). Cascadilla Press.

37.

Schütze

C. T.

(2001). On the nature of default case. Syntax, 4(3), 205–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9612.00044

38.

Schütze

C. T. R.

(1997). INFL in child and adult language: Agreement, case and licensing [Doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

39.

Selin

C. M.

Rice

M. L.

Girolamo

T. M.

Wang

C. J.

(2022). Work setting effects on speech-language pathology practice: Implications for identification of children with specific language impairment. American Journal of Speech-language Pathology, 31, 854–880. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_AJSLP-21-00024

40.

Seymour

H. N.

Bland-Stewart

Green

L. J.

(1998). Difference versus deficit in child African American English. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 29(2), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.2902.96

41.

Shimpi

Gámez

Huttenlocher

Vasilyeva

(2007). Syntactic priming in 3- and 4-year-old children: Evidence for abstract representations of transitive and dative forms. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1334–1346. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1334

42.

Sossaman

E. C.

(2019). Relationship between subject pronoun and verb finite marking in AAE-speaking children (LSU master’s theses 4908). https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5946&context=gradschool_theses

43.

Stockman

I. J.

(2010). A review of developmental and applied language research on African American children: From a deficit to difference perspective on dialect differences. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41, 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0086)

44.

Valian

(1991). Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children. Cognition, 40, 21–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90046-7

45.

Wexler

Schütze

C. T.

Rice

(1998). Subject case in children with SLI and unaffected controls: Evidence for the Agr/Tns omission model. Language Acquisition, 7, 317–344. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la0702-4_8

46.

Wiig

E. H.

Secord

W. A.

Semel

(2004). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals preschool-2. Pearson/PsychCorp.

47.

Wisman Weil

Leonard

L. B

. (2017). Case assignment in English-speaking children: A paired priming paradigm. Journal of Child Language, 44, 943–967. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000916000337

48.

Wolfram

Schilling

(2015). American English: Dialects and variation (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

49.

Zimmerman

I. L.

Steiner

V. G.

Pond

R. E.

(2011). Preschool language scales—Fifth Edition. Pearson.

Lexical Responses to Subject Pronoun Priming: Assessment Considerations for Preschoolers with Inconsistent Case Marking

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References