The purpose of this study was to investigate which of the available Spanish sentence tests U.S. audiologists currently utilize to evaluate Spanish-speaking cochlear implant candidates. An online questionnaire was created and distributed nationwide. A total of 25 audiologists reported using the Spanish HINT and Spanish AzBio. Limitations regarding scoring and variability of accents were described.
CarlsonM. L.SladenD. P.GurgelR. K.TombersN. M.LohseC. M.DriscollC. L. (2017). Survey of the American neurotology society on cochlear implantation: Part 1, candidacy assessment and expanding indications. Otology & Neurotology, 39, e12–e19. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001632
4.
GaetaL.JohnA. (2015). Considerations in speech recognition testing of bilingual and Spanish-speaking patients part 1: Older children and adults. Journal of Educational, Pediatric & (Re)Habilitative Audiology, 1, 1–15.
HolderJ. T.ReynoldsS. M.SunderhausL. W.GiffordR. H. (2018). Current profile of adults presenting for preoperative cochlear implant evaluation. Trends in Hearing, 22, 2331216518755288. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216518755288
LopezS. M.MartinF. N.ThibodeauL. M. (1997). Performance of monolingual and bilingual speakers of English and Spanish on the synthetic sentence identification test. American Journal of Audiology, 6(3), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1044/1059-0889.0603.33
10.
RivasA.PerkinsE.RivasA.RinconL. A.LitvakL.SpahrT.DormanM.KesslerD.GiffordR. (2021). Development and validation of the Spanish AzBio sentence corpus. Otology & Neurotology: Official Publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 42(1), 154–158. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002970
11.
ShiL.-F. (2014). Speech audiometry and Spanish-English bilinguals: Challenges in clinical practice. American Journal of Audiology, 23, 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_AJA-14-0022
