The lack of research exploring the influence of dynamic visual narratives on inference skills prompted the present study with an aim to profile the inference skills in school children between the ages of 6 years and 9 years 11 months using dynamic visual narratives. A total of 80 participants were considered for the study. An animated story was designed as the dynamic visual narrative stimuli based on which an “inference task” was formulated, which included forced-choice questions and free-response questions. The responses of the forced-choice questions were analyzed quantitatively using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), while the responses from the free-response questions were analyzed qualitatively. The results revealed an increase in inference skills with age, with children using less seductive details, beginning to display inductive inference, and providing multiple inferences. The inference profiles obtained from the study can serve as evidence for the development of bridging inference skills from dynamic visual narratives in children.
AckermanB. P. (1986). Referential and causal coherence in the story comprehension of children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41(2), 336–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(86)90044-5
2.
AckermanB. P. (1988). Reason inferences in the story comprehension of children and adults. Child Development, 1426–1442. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130504
3.
AminS.JanH. (2018). Smart classroom a new paradigm for teaching and learning: Its implementation and setback with special reference to J&K. Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 6, 682–701.
4.
ApposeA.KaruppaliS. (2018). Decoding the macrostructural form of oral narratives in typically developing children between 6 – 11 years of age: Using story grammar analysis. Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences, 17(1), 1–8.
5.
BarnesM. A.DennisM.Haefele-KalvaitisJ. (1996). The effects of knowledge availability and knowledge accessibility on coherence and elaborative inferencing in children from six to fifteen years of age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61(3), 216–241.
BodnerK. E.EngelhardtC. R.HallW.WilliamsD. L. (2015). Making inferences: Comprehension of physical causality, intentionality, and emotions in discourse by high-functioning older children, adolescents, and adults with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(9), 2721–2733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2436-3.Making
8.
BornensM.-T. (1990). Problems brought about by “reading” a sequence of pictures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49(2), 189–226.
9.
CainK.OakhillJ. V.BarnesM. A.BryantP. E. (2001). Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 29(6), 850–859.
10.
CarlsonS. E.BroekP.Van Den McmasterK.RappN.Bohn-gettlerC. M.KendeouP.WhiteM. J. (2014). Effects of comprehension skill on inference generation during reading. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 61(3), 258–277.
11.
Castro-AlonsoJ. C.AyresP.PaasF. (2015). Animations showing Lego manipulative tasks: Three potential moderators of effectiveness. Computers & Education, 85, 1–13.
12.
ChaudronC. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge University Press.
CohnN.BenderP. (2017). Drawing the line between constituent structure and coherence relations in visual narratives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(2), 289–301.
15.
CullenR. (1998). Teacher talk and the classroom context. ELT Journal, 52(3), 179–187.
16.
DavidsonM. C.AmsoD.AndersonL. C.DiamondA. (2006). Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia, 44(11), 2037–2078.
17.
DiergartenA. K.NiedingG. (2016). Online emotional inferences in written and auditory texts: A study with children and adults. Reading and Writing, 29(7), 1383–1407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9642-z
18.
GathercoleS. E.PickeringS. J.AmbridgeB.WearingH. (2004). The structure of working memory from 4 to 15 years of age. Developmental Psychology, 40(2), 177–190.
19.
GraesserA. C.SingerM.TrabassoT. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371
20.
HallC.BarnesM. A. (2017). Inference instruction to support reading comprehension for elementary students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52(5), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451216676799
21.
HoD. G. E. (2005). Why do teachers ask the questions they ask?RELC Journal, 36(3), 297–310.
22.
HuizingaM.DolanC. V.van der MolenM. W. (2006). Age-related change in executive function: Developmental trends and a latent variable analysis. Neuropsychologia, 44(11), 2017–2036.
23.
KendeouP. (2015). A general inference skill. In O’BrienE. J.CookA. E.LorchR. F. Jr. (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 160–181). Cambridge University Press.
24.
KendeouP.Bohn-GetterC.WhiteM. J.van den BroekP. (2008). Children’s inference generation across media. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 259–272.
25.
KendeouP.McMasterK. L.ButterfussR.KimJ.BresinaB.WagnerK. (2020). The Inferential Language Comprehension (iLC) Framework: Supporting children’s comprehension of visual narratives. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(1), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12457
26.
KintschW.Van DijkT. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394.
27.
LeeY.KinzieM. B.WhittakerJ. V. (2012). Impact of online support for teachers’ open-ended questioning in pre-k science activities. Teaching and teacher education, 28(4), 568–577.
28.
LoschkyL. C.HutsonJ. P.SmithM. E.SmithT. J.MaglianoJ. P. (2018). Viewing static visual narratives through the lens of the Scene Perception and Event Comprehension Theory (SPECT). In DunstA.LaubrockJ.WildfeuerJ. (Eds.), Empirical comics research (pp. 217–238). Routledge.
29.
LoschkyL. C.LarsonA. M.SmithT. J.MaglianoJ. P. (2019). The Scene Perception & Event Comprehension Theory (SPECT) applied to visual narratives. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(1), 311–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12455
30.
LynchJ. S.Van Den BroekP.KremerK. E.KendeouP.WhiteM. J.LorchE. P. (2008). The development of narrative comprehension and its relation to other early reading skills. Reading Psychology, 29(4), 327–365.
31.
MaglianoJ. P.KoppK.McNerneyM. W.RadvanskyG. A.ZacksJ. M. (2012). Aging and perceived event structure as a function of modality. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19(1–2), 264–282.
32.
MaglianoJ. P.LarsonA. M.HiggsK.LoschkyL. C. (2015). The relative roles of visuospatial and linguistic working memory systems in generating inferences during visual narrative comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 44(2), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0558-7
33.
MaglianoJ. P.LoschkyL. C.ClintonJ. A.LarsonA. M. (2013). Is reading the same as viewing? In MillerB.CuttingL.McCardleP. (Eds.), Unraveling the behavioral, neurobiological and genetic components of reading comprehension (pp. 78–90). https://129.130.8.49/psych/vcl/publications/Magliano_et_al_2013-3.pdf
34.
MasonR. A.JustM. A. (2011). Differentiable cortical networks for inferences concerning people’s intentions versus physical causality. Human Brain Mapping, 32, 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21021
35.
MasonR. A.WilliamsD. L.KanaR. K.MinshewN.AdamM. (2008). Theory of Mind disruption and recruitment of the right hemisphere during narrative comprehension in autism. Neuropsychologia, 46, 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.018
36.
McNamaraD. S.MaglianoJ. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 297–384.
37.
NunanD. (1987). Communicative language teaching: Making it work. ELT Journal, 41(2), 136–145.
38.
ParisS. G. (2003). Assessing narrative comprehension in young children. Reading Research, 38(1), 36–76.
39.
PiagetJ. (1976). Piaget’s theory. In Piaget and his school (pp. 11–23). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
40.
PimentaS.PoovaiahR. (2010, August). On defining visual narratives. Design Thoughts, 25–46.
41.
PisellaL.AndréV.GavaultE.Le FlemA.Luc-PupatE.GlissouxC.Gonzalez-MongeS. (2013). A test revealing the slow acquisition and the dorsal stream substrate of visuo-spatial perception. Neuropsychologia, 51(1), 106–113.
SaldañaD.FrithU. (2007). Do readers with autism make bridging inferences from world knowledge?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96, 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2006.11.002
44.
SchmetzE.MagisD.DetrauxJ.-J.BarisnikovK.RousselleL. (2018). Basic visual perceptual processes in children with typical development and cerebral palsy: The processing of surface, length, orientation, and position. Child Neuropsychology, 25(2), 232–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2018.1441820
45.
SchmetzE.RousselleL.BallazC.DetrauxJ.-J.BarisnikovK. (2017). The BEVPS: A new test battery to assess visual perceptual and spatial processing abilities in 5–14 year-old children. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 7(4), 317–333.
46.
SchmidtC. R.ParisS. G. (1983). Children’s use of successive clues to generate and monitor inferences. Child Development, 54(3), 742–759.
SingerN. (2019). The relationship between watching animated cartoon and information processing speed and level for sample children in age group [5-6] years. Humanities 7 Social Sciences Reviews, 7(5), 1321–1337.
49.
SinghiP.KumarM.MalhiP.KumarR. (2007). Utility of the WHO ten questions screen for disability detection in a rural community—The North Indian Experience. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, 53(6), 383–387. https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmm047
50.
van den BroekP.HelderA.Van LeijenhorstL. (2012). Sensitivity to structural centrality: Developmental and individual differences in reading comprehension skills. In BrittA.GoldmanS.RouetJ. F. (Eds), Reading-From Words to Multiple Texts (pp. 146–160). Routledge.
51.
VuontelaV.SteenariM.CarlsonS.KoivistoJ.FjalbergM.AronenE. T. (2003). Audiospatial and visuospatial working memory in 6 – 13 year old school children. Learning & Memory, 10(1), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.53503
YeariM. (2017). The role of working memory in inference generation during reading comprehension: Retention, (re)activation, or suppression of verbal information. Learning and Individual Differences, 56(March), 2016–2018.
