Augmentative and Alternative Communication for Adults With Complex Communication Needs: A Review of Single-Case Research

Abstract

The authors conducted a systematic review of the literature, including studies that used a single-case design (SCD) and taught augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) use to adults with complex communication needs. The purpose of this review was to describe (a) adults receiving AAC intervention, (b) components of the interventions used, and (c) how the literature met quality standards set by the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC). Across the 12 SCD studies included, a total of 28 adults with complex communication needs received intervention. As part of the intervention, the majority of the participants (n = 24; 86%) were introduced to new AAC systems (e.g., picture, communication application). Ten of 12 studies showed at least moderate evidence of effectiveness. Only three of 12 studies met the WWC standards without reservation. Findings from this review call for action to ensure quality AAC access and services are available to adults with complex communication needs.

Keywords

adult augmentative and alternative communication complex communication needs review

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alwell

Cobb

(2009). Social and communicative interventions and transition outcomes for youth with disabilities: A systematic review. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(2), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809336657

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (n.d.). Augmentative and alternative communication. https://www.asha.org/PRPSpecificTopic.aspx?folderid=8589942773&section=Key_Issues#AAC_Systems

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2016). Scope of practice in speech-language pathology. https://www.asha.org/policy/SP2016-00343/

Barnes

C. S.

Dunning

J. L.

Rehfeldt

R. A.

(2011). An evaluation of strategies for training staff to implement the picture exchange communication system. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5(4), 1574–1583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2011.03.003

Beadle-Brown

Leigh

Whelton

Richardson

Beecham

Baumker

Bradshaw

(2016). Quality of life and quality of support for people with severe intellectual disability and complex needs. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 29(5), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12200

*Beck

A. R.

Stoner

J. B.

Dennis

M. L.

(2009). An investigation of aided language stimulation: Does it increase AAC use with adults with developmental disabilities and complex communication needs? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610802131059

Beukelman

D. R.

Mirenda

(2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Paul H. Brookes.

Bondy

A. S.

Frost

L. A.

(1994). The picture exchange communication system. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 9(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/108835769400900301

Brady

N. C.

Bruce

Goldman

Erickson

Milneo

Ogletree

B. T.

. . . Wilkinson

(2016). Communication services and supports for individuals with severe disabilities: Guidance for assessment and intervention. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 121(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-121.2.121

10.

Brewster

(2013). Saying the “F word. . . in the nicest possible way”: Augmentative communication and discourses of disability. Disability and Society, 28(1), 125–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.736672

11.

Burke

Wassink

Martin

Seikel

A. J.

(2008). Message retrieval for survivors of traumatic brain injury. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(1), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610701421015

12.

*Conklin

C. G.

Mayer

G. R.

(2011). Effects of implementing the picture exchange communication system (PECS) with adults with developmental disabilities and severe communication deficits. Remedial and Special Education, 32(2), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510361268

13.

DeLeon

I. G.

Iwata

B. A.

(1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29(4), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519

14.

Dodd

J. L.

Gorey

(2014). AAC intervention as an immersion model. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 35(2), 103–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740113504242

15.

Hamm

Mirenda

. (2006). Post-school quality of life for individuals with developmental disabilities who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22(2), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610500395493

16.

Holyfield

Drager

K. D.

Kremkow

J. M.

Light

(2017). Systematic review of AAC intervention research for adolescents and adults with autism spectrum disorder. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33(4), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2017.1370495

17.

*Hong

E. R.

Ganz

J. B.

Gilliland

Ninci

(2014). Teaching caregivers to implement an augmentative and alternative communication intervention to an adult with ASD. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(5), 570–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.01.012

18.

Horner

R. H.

Carr

E. G.

Halle

McGee

Odom

Wolery

(2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203

19.

Kratochwill

T. R.

Hitchcock

Horner

R. H.

Levin

J. R.

Odom

S. L.

Rindskopf

D. M.

Shadish

W. R.

(2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/ReferenceResources/wwc_scd.pdf

20.

Kuyken

Orley

Hudelson

Sartorius

(1994). Quality of life assessment across cultures. International Journal of Mental Health, 23, 5–27.

21.

Lasker

Bedrosian

(2001). Promoting acceptance of augmentative and alternative communication by adults with acquired communication disorders. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17(3), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/aac.17.3.141.153

22.

Ledford

J. R.

Gast

D. L.

(2018). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.

23.

*Light

J. C.

Binger

Agate

T. L.

Ramsay

K. N.

(1999). Teaching partner-focused questions to individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication to enhance their communicative competence. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 4, 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4201.241

24.

*Light

J. C.

Dattilo

English

Gutierrez

Hartz

(1992). Instructing facilitators to support the communication of people who use augmentative communication systems. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 35(4), 865–875. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3504.865

25.

McNaughton

Bryen

D. N.

(2007). AAC technologies to enhance participation and access to meaningful societal roles for adolescents and adults with developmental disabilities who require AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(3), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610701573856

26.

McNaughton

Light

(2015). What we write about when we write about AAC: The past 30 years of research and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 261–270. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1099736

27.

McNaughton

Light

Beukelman

D. R.

Klein

Nieder

Nazareth

(2019). Building capacity in AAC: A person-centred approach to supporting participation by people with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1556731

28.

*Nepo

Tincani

Axelrod

Meszaros

(2017). iPod touch® to increase functional communication of adults with autism spectrum disorder and significant intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 32(3), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357615612752

29.

Neumann

Quinting

Rosenkranz

De Beer

Jonas

Stenneken

(2019). Quality of life in adults with neurogenic speech-language-communication difficulties: A systematic review of existing measures. Journal of Communication Disorders, 79, 24–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2019.01.003

30.

Odom

Upthegrove

(1997). Moving toward employment using AAC: Case study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13(4), 258–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619712331278078

31.

*Ogletree

B. T.

Bartholomew

Kirksey

M. L.

Guenigsman

Hambrecht

Price

Wofford

M. C.

(2016). Communication training supporting an AAC user with severe intellectual disability: Application of the communication partner instruction model. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 28(1), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-015-9444-2

32.

Ogletree

B. T.

Bartholomew

Price

J. R.

(2020). Large-group application of communication partner instruction with stakeholders of adults with severe intellectual disabilities. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 41(3), 188–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740119830652

33.

Pouliot

D. M.

Müller

Frasché

N. F.

Kern

A. S.

Resti

I. H.

(2017). A tool for supporting communication in the workplace for individuals with intellectual disabilities and/or autism. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 40(4), 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143416683927

34.

Radtke

J. V.

Baumann

B. M.

Garrett

K. L.

Happ

M. B.

(2011). Listening to the voiceless patient: Case reports in assisted communication in the intensive care unit. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 14(6), 791–795. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2010.0313

35.

Ray

(2015). Real-life challenges in using augmentative and alternative communication by persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 36(3), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740114545359

36.

*Schepis

M. M.

Reid

D. H.

(1995). Effects of a voice output communication aid on interactions between support personnel and an individual with multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28(1), 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1995.28-73

37.

Simacek

Pennington

Reichle

Parker-McGowan

(2018). Aided AAC for people with severe to profound and multiple disabilities: A systematic review of interventions and treatment intensity. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2(1), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-017-0050-4

38.

*Smith

Hand

Dowrick

P. W.

(2014). Video feedforward for rapid learning of a picture-based communication system. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(4), 926–936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1946-0

39.

*Stoner

J. B.

Beck

A. R.

Bock

S. J.

Hickey

Kosuwan

Thompson

J. R.

(2006). The effectiveness of the picture exchange communication system with nonspeaking adults. Remedial and Special Education, 27(3), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325060270030401

40.

Talman

Wilder

Stier

Gustafsson

(2019). Staff members and managers’ views of the conditions for the participation of adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 32(1), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12516

41.

van der Meer

Matthews

Ogilvie

Berry

Waddington

Balandin

. . . Sigafoos

(2017). Training direct-care staff to provide communication intervention to adults with intellectual disability: A systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26(4), 1279–1295. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0125

42.

*Wendt

Hsu

Simon

Dienhart

Cain

(2019). Effects of an iPad-based speech-generating device infused into instruction with the picture exchange communication system for adolescents and young adults with severe autism spectrum disorder. Behavior Modification, 43(6), 898–932. https://doi.org/0145445519870552

43.

*Wood

A. L.

Luiselli

J. K.

Harchik

A. E.

(2007). Training instructional skills with paraprofessional service providers at a community-based habilitation setting. Behavior Modification, 31(6), 847–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445507302893