Paraeducators are the most frequent communication partners during the school day for students who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), yet they often lack training in AAC best practices. This intervention study examined the effect of an in-class coaching intervention on the aided language modeling (ALM) skills of paraeducators who work with students who use AAC. An intervention protocol using evidence-based coaching strategies was used to support paraeducator implementation of ALM in typical classroom activities. The multiple-baseline single-subject design measured the use of ALM by four paraeducators. Data were analyzed visually and by calculating Tau-U and gain scores. Results suggest a strong effect from the coaching intervention on ALM skills for each of the paraeducators. Challenges and benefits of paraeducator-focused interventions in classroom settings are presented.
Artman-MeekerK.FettigA.BartonE.PenneyA.ZengS. (2015). Applying an evidence-based framework to the early childhood coaching literature. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35, 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121415595550
2.
BartonE. E.PokorskiE. A.GossettS.SweeneyE.QiuJ.ChoiG. (2018). The use of email to coach early childhood teachers. Journal of Early Intervention, 40(3), 212–228.
3.
BeukelmanD.LightJ. (2020). Augmentative & alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (5th ed.). Paul H. Brookes.
4.
BiggsE. E.CarterE. W.GilsonC. B. (2019). A scoping review of the involvement of children’s communication partners in aided augmentative and alternative communication modeling interventions. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 28, 743–758. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-18-0024
5.
BingerC.Kent-WalshJ.EwingC.TaylorS. (2010). Teaching educational assistants to facilitate the multisymbol message productions of young students who require augmentative and alternative communication. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19(2), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2009/09-0015
6.
BrockM. E.CarterE. W. (2013). A systematic review of paraprofessional-delivered instruction to improve outcomes for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 38, 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079691303800401
7.
ByiersB. J.ReichleJ.SymonsF. J. (2012). Single-subject experimental design for evidence-based practice. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(4), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0036
8.
DouglasS. N. (2012). Teaching paraeducators to support the communication of individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: A literature review. Current Issues in Education, 15(1), 1–14.
9.
DunstC. J. (2015). Improving the design and implementation of in-service professional development in early childhood intervention. Infants & Young Children, 28, 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000042
10.
GhereG.York-BarrJ. (2007). Paraprofessional turnover and retention in inclusive programs. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 21–32.
11.
Kent-WalshJ. (2003). The effects of an educational assistant instructional program on the communicative turns of students who use augmentative and alternative communication during book reading activities (Doctoral dissertation). The Pennsylvania State University.
12.
Kent-WalshJ.McNaughtonD. (2005). Communication partner instruction in AAC: Present practices and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(3), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610400006646
13.
Kent-WalshJ.MurzaK. A.MalaniM.BingerC. (2015). Effects of communication partner instruction on the communication of individuals using AAC: A meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 271–284.
14.
KnowlesM. S.SwansonR. A.HoltonE. F.III. (2005). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (6th ed.). Elsevier Science & Technology Books.
15.
KratochwillT. R.LevinJ. R. (2010). Enhancing the scientific credibility of single-case intervention research: Randomization to the rescue. Psychological Methods, 15(2), 124–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017736
NorburnK.LevinA.MorganS. N.HardingC. (2016). A survey of augmentative and alternative communication used in an inner city special school. British Journal of Special Education, 43, 289–306.
18.
O’NeillT.LightJ.PopeL. (2018). Effects of interventions that include aided augmentative and alternative communication input on the communication of individuals with complex communication needs: A meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(7), 1743–1765. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0132
19.
PitmanD. (2015). Improving augmentative communication during storybook reading (Unpublished master’s thesis). Lamar University.
20.
RomanoM.WoodsJ. (2018). Collaborative coaching with Early Head Start teachers using responsive communication strategies. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 38, 30–41.
21.
RudebuschJ.WiechmannJ. (2013). Time block after time block. The ASHA Leader, 18(8), 40–45.
22.
SennottS. C. (2013). Empowering children with complex communication needs to use iPad based AAC during shared storybook reading (Doctoral dissertation). State College, The Pennsylvania State University.
23.
SennottS. C.LightJ.McNaughtonD. (2016). AAC modeling intervention research review. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 41, 101–115.
24.
ShireS. Y.JonesN. (2015). Communication partners supporting children with complex communication needs who use AAC. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 37, 15–13.
25.
SnyderP. A.HemmeterM. L.FoxL. (2015). Supporting implementation of evidence-based practices through practice-based coaching. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(3), 133–143.
26.
SnyderP. A.HemmeterM. L.McLeanM.SandallS.McLaughlinT.AlginaJ. (2018). Effects of professional development on preschool teachers’ use of embedded instruction practices. Exceptional Children, 84(2), 213–232.
27.
SotoG.LlerE. M.HuntP.GoetzL. (2001). Professional skills for serving students who use AAC in general education classrooms: A team perspective. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32(1), 51–56.
28.
VannestK. J.NinciJ. (2015). Evaluating intervention effects in single-case research designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93(4), 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12038
29.
VannestK. J.ParkerR. I.GonenO.AdiguzelT. (2016). Single case research: Web based calculators for SCR analysis (Version 2.0) [Web-based application]. Texas A&M University.
