An eight-step instruction model was used to train a self-contained classroom teacher, speech-language pathologist, and two instructional assistants in partner-augmented input, a modeling strategy for teaching augmentative and alternative communication use. With the exception of a 2-hr training session, instruction primarily was conducted during naturally occurring lessons in a self-contained classroom. All staff increased modeling on students’ speech-generating devices between pre- and post-test measures across activities.
Assistive Technology Industry Association. (2012). The critical need for knowledge and usage of AT and AAC among speech-language pathologists: Survey white paper. Chicago, IL: Author.
2.
BerryJ. O. (1987). Strategies for involving parents in programs for young children using augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 90–93.
3.
BingerC.Kent-WalshJ.EwingC.TaylorS. (2010). Teaching educational assistants to facilitate the multisymbol message productions of young students who require augmentative and alternative communication. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 108–120.
4.
BingerC.LightJ. (2007). The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 30–43.
5.
BirmanB. F.DesimoneL.PorterA. C.GaretM. S. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 57, 28–38.
6.
BrunoJ.TrembathD. (2006). Use of aided language stimulation to improve syntactic performance during a weeklong intervention program. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 300–313.
7.
CafieroJ. (1998). Communication power for individuals with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 13, 113–121.
8.
CostiganF. A.LightJ. (2010). A review of preservice training in augmentative and alternative communication for speech-language pathologists, special education teachers, and occupational therapists. Assistive Technology, 22, 200–212.
9.
DadaS.AlantE. (2009). The effect of aided language stimulation on vocabulary acquisition in children with little or no functional speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 50–64.
10.
Darling-HammondL. (1995). Changing conceptions of teaching and teacher development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 22, 9–26.
11.
DoddJ.GoreyM. (2014). AAC intervention as an immersion model. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 35, 103–107.
12.
DouglasS. N. (2012). Teaching paraeducators to support the communication of individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: A literature review. Current Issues in Education, 15, 1–13.
13.
DragerK. D. R.PostalV. J.CarrolusL.CastellanoM.GaglianoC.GlynnJ. (2006). The effect of aided language modeling on symbol comprehension and production in two preschoolers with autism. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 112–125.
EllisE. S.DeshlerD. D.LenzB. K.SchumakerJ. B.ClarkF. L. (1991). An instructional model for teaching learning strategies. Focus on Exceptional Children, 23, 1–24.
16.
HarrisM.ReichleJ. (2004). The impact of aided language stimulation on symbol comprehension and production in children with moderate cognitive disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 155–167.
17.
JoyceB. R.ShowersB. (1980). Improving inservice training: The message of research. Educational Leadership, 37, 379–385.
18.
JoyceB. R.ShowersB. (1981). Transfer of training: The contribution of “coaching.”Journal of Education, 2, 163–172.
19.
Kent-WalshJ.BingerC.HashamZ. (2010). Effects of parent instruction on the symbolic communication of children using augmentative and alternative communication during storybook reading. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 97–107.
20.
Kent-WalshJ.BingerC.MalaniM. D. (2010). Teaching partners to support communication skills of young children who use AAC: Lessons from the ImPAACT program. Early Childhood Services, 4, 155–170.
21.
Kent-WalshJ.McNaughtonD. (2005). Communication partner instruction in AAC: Present practices and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 195–204.
22.
Kent-WalshJ.MurzaK. A.MalaniM. D.BingerC. (2015). Effects of communication partner instruction on the communication of individuals using AAC: A meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 271–284.
23.
KnightJ. (2007). Instructional coaching: A partnership approach to improving instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
24.
LightJ.DattiloJ.EnglishJ.GutierrezL.HartzJ. (1992). Instructing facilitators who support the communication of people who use augmentative communication systems. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 865–875.
25.
LloydL. L.FullerD. R.ArvidsonH. H. (1997). Augmentative and alternative communication: A handbook of principles and practices. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
26.
LundS. (2004, October). Facilitating grammar development using augmented input and recasting. Paper presented at ISAAC, Natal, Brazil.
27.
RomskiM.SevcikR. (1996). Breaking the speech barrier: Language development through augmented means. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
28.
SennottS. C.MasonL. H. (2016). AAC modeling with the iPad during storybook reading pilot study. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 37, 242–254.
29.
ShireS. Y.JonesN. (2015). Communication partners supporting children with complex communication needs who use AAC: A systematic review. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 37, 3–15.
30.
ShowersB.JoyceB. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Improving Professional Practice, 53, 12–16.
31.
Solomon-RiceP. L.SotoG. (2009). Language modeling as an efficacious early language intervention approach with young children demonstrating complex communication needs. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication. ASHA Special Interest Group, 12, 21–27.
32.
Solomon-RiceP. L.SotoG. (2014). Facilitating vocabulary in toddlers using AAC: A preliminary study comparing focused stimulation and augmented input. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 35, 204–215.
