This study explores the relationship between preschool phonological and nonphonological language performance and first-grade reading performance. Data were gathered from the files of 149 students who had completed a universal kindergarten screening program in the spring prior to enrollment. Bivariate correlation analyses, Steiger’s Z comparisons, and hierarchical multiple regression analyses were completed to determine the associations between phonological and nonphonological language skills and subsequent first-grade spring word analysis and reading composite performance. Phonological and nonphonological tasks were moderately useful in predicting students’ subsequent first-grade word analysis and reading composite performance. No significant difference in association was found between the phonological and nonphonological composites. A combined phonological and nonphonological model provided the strongest predictive utility. This study supports a significant and equivalent association between preschool phonological and nonphonological language skills and subsequent first-grade reading performance.
AnthonyJ. L.AsselM. A.WilliamsJ. M. (2007). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the DIAL-3: What does this “developmental screener” really measure?Journal of School Psychology, 45, 423–438. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2007.02.003
2.
AnthonyJ. L.WilliamsJ. M.McDonaldR.DavidJ. F. (2007). Phonological processing and emergent literacy in younger and older preschool children. Annals of Dyslexia, 57, 113–137. doi:10.1007/s11881-007-0008-8
3.
BadianN. A. (1998). A validation of the role of preschool phonological and orthographic skills in the prediction of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 472–478. doi:10.1177/002221949803100505
4.
Batson-MagnusonL. (2015). A comparison of the predictive validity of the DIAL-R and DIAL-3 for subsequent special education eligibility. Psychology and Education, 52, 24–37.
5.
BellS. M.McCallumS. R.CoxE. A. (2003). Toward a research-based assessment of dyslexia: Using cognitive measures to identify reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 505–516.
6.
BishopA. G.LeagueM. B. (2006). Identifying a multivariate screening model to predict reading difficulties at the onset of kindergarten: A longitudinal analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29, 235–252. doi:10.2307/30035552
7.
BlaiklockK. E. (2004). The importance of letter knowledge in the relationship between phonological awareness and reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 36–57. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2004.00213.x
8.
BoyerN.EhriL. (2011). Contribution of phonemic segmentation instruction with letters and articulation pictures to word reading and spelling in beginners. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 440–470. doi:10.1080/10888438.2010.520778
9.
BriganceA. (1985). Brigance Preschool Screener. North Billerica, MA: Curriculum Associates.
10.
CainK. (2003). Text comprehension and its relation to coherence and cohesion in children’s fictional narratives. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 335–351.
11.
CattsH. W. (1991). Early identification of dyslexia: Evidence from a follow-up study of speech-language impaired children. Annals of Dyslexia, 41, 163–177. doi:10.1007/BF02648084
12.
CattsH. W. (1993). The relationship between speech-language impairment and reading disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36, 948–958. doi:10.1044/jshr.3605.948
13.
CattsH. W.FeyM. E.ZhangX.TomblinJ. B. (2001). Estimating the risk of future reading difficulties in kindergarten children: A research-based model and its clinical implementation. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 38–50. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2001/004)
14.
CattsH. W.HoganT. P.FeyM. E. (2003). Subgrouping poor readers on the basis of individual differences in reading-related abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 151–164. doi:10.1177/002221940303600208
15.
CattsH. W.KamhiA. G. (1999). Language and learning disabilities. London, England: Allyn & Bacon.
16.
CronbachL. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. doi:10.1007/bf02310555
17.
CTB/McGraw-Hill. (1997). Test of Cognitive Skills (2nd ed.). Monterey, CA: Author.
ElbroC. (1996). Early linguistic abilities and reading development: A review and hypothesis. Reading and Writing, 8, 453–485.
20.
ElliotC. D. (1990). Differential Ability Scales. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessments.
21.
FeaganL.ShortE. J. (1984). Developmental differences in the comprehension and production of narratives by reading-disabled and normally achieving children. Child Development, 55, 1727–1736.
22.
FowlerA. (1991). How early phonological development might set the stage for phoneme awareness. In BradyS. A.ShankweilerD. P. (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 97–117). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
GallagherA.FirthU.SnowlingM. J. (2000). Precursors of literacy delay among children at genetic risk of dyslexia. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41, 203–213. doi:10.1017/S0021963099005284
24.
GeorgiouG. K.ParrilaR.LiaoC. H. (2008). Rapid naming speed and reading across languages that vary in orthographic consistency. Reading and Writing, 21, 885–903.
25.
HeathS. M.HogbenJ. H. (2004). Cost-effective prediction of reading difficulties. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 751–765. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2004/057)
26.
HindsonB.ByrneB.Fielding-BarnsleyR.NewmanC.HineD. W. (2005). Assessment and early instruction of preschool children at risk for reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 687–704. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.687
27.
HoganT. (2009). A short report: Word-level phonological and lexical characteristics interact to influence phoneme awareness (Special Education and Communication Disorders Faculty Publications, Paper 12). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/specedfacpub/12
28.
HowellD. C. (2002). Statistical methods for psychology (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.
29.
KamhiA.CattsH. (Eds.). (2012). Language and reading disabilities (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
30.
LaheyM. (1990). Who shall be called language disordered? Some reflections and one perspective. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 612–620.
31.
LaheyM.EdwardsJ. (1996). Why do children with specific language impairment name pictures more slowly than their peers?Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1081–1098.
32.
LockeJ. L. (1988). The sound shape of early lexical representations. In SmithM. D.LockeJ. L. (Eds.), The emergent lexicon: The child’s development of linguistic vocabulary (pp. 3–18). New York, NY: Academic Press.
33.
LoniganC. J.BurgessS. R.AnthonyJ. L. (2000). Development of emergent literacy and early reading skills in preschool children: Evidence from a latent-variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 36, 596–613. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.36.5.596
34.
Mardell-CzudnowskiC. D.GoldenbergD. S. (1998). Developmental indicators for the assessment of learning (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
35.
MasonR. O.LindD. A.MarchalW. G. (1983). Statistics: An introduction. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
36.
MetsalaJ. L.WalleyA. C. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In MetsalaJ. L. (Ed.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 89–120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
MissallK.ReschlyA.BettsJ.McConnellS.HeistadD.PickartM.MarstonD. (2007). Examination of the predictive validity of preschool early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 36, 433–452.
38.
National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel (Executive summary). Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
NortonE. S.WolfM. (2012). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: Implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 427–452.
41.
ParisA. H.ParisS. G. (2003). Assessing narrative comprehension in young children. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 36–76.
42.
SavageR. S.FredericksonN.GoodwinR.PatniU.SmithN.TuersleyL. (2005). Relationships among rapid digit naming, phonological processing, motor automaticity and speech perception in poor, average, and good readers and spellers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 12–28. doi:10.1177/00222194050380010201
43.
ScarboroughH. S. (1990). Very early language deficits in dyslexic children. Child Development, 61, 1728–1743. doi:10.2307/1130834
44.
ScarboroughH. S. (1998). Predicting the future achievement of second graders with reading disabilities: Contributions of phonemic awareness, verbal memory, rapid naming, and IQ. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 115–136. doi:10.1007/s11881-998-0006-5
45.
ShareD. L.LeikinM. (2004). Language impairment at school entry and later reading disability: Connections at lexical versus supralexical levels of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 87–110. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0801_5
46.
SimpsonJ.EverattJ. (2005). Reception class predictors of literacy skills. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 171–188. doi:10.1348/000709904X24780
47.
SnowlingM. J. (2000). Dyslexia (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
48.
SteigerJ. H. (1980). Test for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245
49.
StorchS. A.WhitehurstG. J. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 934–947. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.6.934
50.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.
51.
WalleyA. C.MetsalaJ. L.GarlockV. M. (2003). Spoken vocabulary growth: Its role in the development of phoneme awareness and early reading ability. Reading and Writing, 16, 5–20.
52.
WeberJ. C.LambD. R. (1970). Statistics and research in physical education. St. Louis, MO: C. V. Mosby.
53.
WesterveldM. F.GillonG. T.MoranC. (2008). A longitudinal investigation of oral narrative skills in children with mixed reading disability. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 132–145.
54.
WiseJ. C.SevcikR. A.MorrisR. D.LovettM. W.WolfM. (2007). The relationship among receptive and expressive vocabulary, listening comprehension, pre-reading skills, word identification skills, and reading comprehension by children with reading disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 1093–1109. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/076)
