A Comparison of Three Professional Development Mechanisms for Improving the Quality of Standards-Based IEP Objectives

Abstract

Professional development is a necessary component of maintaining competency in professional practice. Technology has opened the door to new formats for delivering professional development, in addition to more traditional modes of training. This study compared three professional development formats for improving the quality of standards-based Individualized Education Program objectives written by school-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs). Forty-seven SLPs were randomly assigned to one of three professional development formats. Fourteen SLPs assigned to the web-based group read training content presented on a website. The 17 SLPs in the workshop group attended a workshop, while the 18 SLPs in the peer coaching group attended the workshop followed by 2 months of peer coaching conducted through a website. No follow-up support was provided to the web-based and workshop groups. Results show that all groups improved; however, the workshop and peer coaching groups made significant improvements compared with the web-based group. Surprisingly, the peer coaching group did not demonstrate continued improvement. The type of coaching, in this case, peer coaching in which two novices observed and provided feedback to each other, may account for the observed plateau in performance. Factors to be considered when matching learner outcomes to professional development activities are summarized and discussed.

Keywords

peer coaching professional development on-line learning speech-language pathologists

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anastos

Ancowitz

(1987). A teacher-directed peer coaching project. Educational Leadership, 45, 40–42.

Bakeman

Gottman

(1997). Recording behavioral sequences. In Bakeman

Gottman

(Eds.), Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (pp. 38–81). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Bethune

K. S.

Wood

C. L.

(2013). Effects of wh-question graphic organizers on reading comprehension skills of students with autism spectrum disorders. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 236–244.

Blank

R. K.

(2013). What research tells us: Common characteristics of professional learning that leads to student achievement. Journal of Staff Development, 34, 50–53. Available from http://www.learningforward.org

Bowman

C. L.

McCormick

(2000). Comparison of peer coaching versus traditional supervision effects. The Journal of Educational Research, 93, 256–261. doi:10.1080/00220670009598714

Cornett

Knight

(2009). Research on coaching. In Knight

(Ed.), Coaching: Approaches and perspectives (pp. 192–216). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Crow

Snyder

(1998). Organizational behavior management in early intervention: Status and implications for research and development. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 18, 131–156.

Desimone

L. M.

Porter

A. C.

Garet

M. S.

Yoon

K. S.

Birman

B. F.

(2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 81–112. doi:10.3102/01623737024002081

Eckert

T. L.

Miller

D. N.

DuPaul

G. J.

(2003). Adolescent suicide prevention: School psychologists’ acceptability of school-based programs. The School Psychology Review, 32, 57–76.

10.

Facteau

J. D.

Dobbins

G. H.

Russell

J. E.

Ladd

R. T.

Kudisch

J. D.

(1995). The influence of general perceptions of the training environment on pre-training motivation and perceived training transfer. Journal of Management, 21, 1–25.

11.

Filcheck

H. A.

McNeil

C. B.

Greco

L. A.

Bernard

R. S.

(2004). Using a whole-class token economy and coaching of teacher skills in a preschool classroom to manage disruptive behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 351–361. doi:10.1002/pits.10168

12.

Ford

J. K.

Quinones

M. A.

Sego

D. J.

Sorra

J. S.

(1992). Factors affecting the opportunity to perform trained tasks on the job. Personnel Psychology, 45, 511–527.

13.

Fullan

Pomfret

(1977). Research in curriculum and instruction implementation. Review of Educational Research, 47, 335–397.

14.

Gingiss

P. L.

(1993). Peer coaching: Building collegial support for using innovative health programs. Journal of School Health, 63, 79–85. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.1993.tb06085.x

15.

Hendrickson

J. M.

Gardner

Kaiser

Riley

(1993). Evaluation of a social interaction coaching program in an integrated day-care setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 213–225.

16.

Huck

S. W.

Cormier

W. H.

Bounds

W. G.

(1974). Reading statistical research. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

17.

Huston

T. A.

Weaver

C. J.

(2007). Peer coaching: Professional development for experienced faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 33, 5–20.

18.

Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).

19.

Ingvarson

Meiers

Beavis

(2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers’ knowledge, practice, student outcomes and efficacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13, 1–26.

20.

Jager

Reezigt

G. J.

Creemers

B. P.

(2002). The effects of teacher training on new instructional behavior in reading comprehension. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 831–842.

21.

Jang

S. J.

Chen

K. C.

(2010). From PCK to TPACK: Developing a transformative model of pre-service science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 553-564.

22.

Jao

(2013). Peer coaching as a model for professional development in the elementary mathematics context: Challenges, needs and rewards. Policy Futures in Education, 11, 290-298. doi:10.2304/pfie.2013.11.3.290

23.

Joyce

Showers

(1988). Student achievement through staff development. White Plains, NY: Longman.

24.

Kang

H. S.

Cha

B.-W.

(2013). What should we consider in teachers’ professional development impact studies? Based on the conceptual framework of Desimone. Creative Education, 4, 11–18. doi:10.4236/ce.2013.44A003

25.

Knowles

Holton

Swanson

R. A.

(2005). The adult learner (6th ed.). New York, NY: Butterworth-Heinemann.

26.

Kohler

F. W.

Crilley

Shearer

Good

(1997). Effects of peer coaching on teacher and student outcomes. Journal of Educational Research, 90, 240–250.

27.

Kohler

F. W.

Ezell

Paluselli

(1999). Promoting changes in teachers’ conduct of student pair activities: An examination of reciprocal peer coaching. The Journal of Special Education, 33, 154–165.

28.

Kohler

F. W.

McCullough

K. M.

Buchan

K. A.

(1995). Using peer coaching to enhance preschool teachers’ development and refinement of classroom activities. Early Education and Development, 6, 215–239.

29.

Kretlow

A. G.

Bartholomew

C. C.

(2010). Using coaching to improve the fidelity of evidence-based practices: A review of studies. The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 33, 279–299. doi:10.1177/0888406410371643

30.

Kretlow

A. G.

Cooke

N. L.

Wood

C. L.

(2012). Using inservice and coaching to increase the accurate use of research-based strategies. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 348–361. doi:10.1177/0741932510395397

31.

Kretlow

A. G.

Wood

C. L.

Cooke

N. L.

(2009). Using in-service and coaching to increase kindergarten teachers’ accurate delivery of group instructional units. The Journal of Special Education, 44, 234–246. doi:10.1177/0022466909341333

32.

Kurth

R. J.

(1985, December). Problems court: The role of the reading educator in the training of elementary school principals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Reading Forum, Sarasota, FL.

33.

Ladyshewsky

R. K.

(2002). A quasi-experimental study of the differences in performance and clinical reasoning using individual learning versus reciprocal peer coaching. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 18, 17–31. doi:10.1080/095939802753570666

34.

Latham

G. P.

Seijts

(1998). Overcoming mental models that limit research on transfer of training in organizational settings. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 371–375. doi:10.1080/095939802753570666

35.

Miller

Harris

Watanabe

(1991). Professional coaching: A method for increasing effective and decreasing ineffective teacher behaviors. Teacher Education and Special Education, 14, 183–191.

36.

Murray

Xin

Mazur

(2009). Effects of peer coaching on teachers’ collaborative interactions and students’ mathematics achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 102, 203–212.

37.

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: Author.

38.

Neubert

G. A.

(1988). Improving teaching through coaching. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.

39.

Neubert

G. A.

Stover

L. T.

(1994). Peer coaching in teacher education. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.

40.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110, § 115, Stat. 1425 (2002).

41.

Notari-Syverson

Schuster

(1995). Putting real-life skills into IEP/IFSPS for infants and young children. Teaching Exceptional Children, 27, 29–32.

42.

Ohlund

C. H.

Jannasch-Pennell

(2000). Impact of asynchronous and synchronous internet-based communication on collaboration and performance among K-12 teachers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23, 405–420. doi:10.2190/U40F-M2LK-VKVW-883L

43.

Oliver

S. K.

(1984). The effects of continuing education on the clinical behavior of nurses. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 15, 130–134.

44.

Onchwari

Keengwe

(2008). The impact of mentor-coaching model on teacher professional development. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 19–24. doi:101007/s10643-007-0233-0

45.

Orlich

D. C.

(1989). Staff development: Enhancing human potential. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

46.

Pearce

Mann

M. K.

Jones

van Buschbach

Olff

Bisson

J. I.

(2012). The most effective way of delivering a train-the-trainers program: A systematic review. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 32, 215–226.

47.

Poplin

C. J.

(2003). Models of professional development. T.H.E. Journal, 30, 38–40.

48.

Power-deFur

Flynn

(2012). Unpacking the standards for intervention. SIG 16 Perspectives on School-Based Issues, 13, 11–16. doi:10.1044/sbo13.1.11

49.

Pusch

McCabe

Pusch

(1985). Personalized on-site coaching: A successful staff development project at Swift Current. Education Canada, 25, 36–39.

50.

Resnick

(2012). National survey of professional development trends: 2012-2013. Retrieved from http://www.educationmarketresearch.com/index.php?p=201&pass=02

51.

Rogers

(1987). If I can see myself, I can change. Educational Leadership, 46, 35–38.

52.

Rudebusch

(2012). From Common Core State Standards to standards-based IEPs: A brief tutorial. SIG 16 Perspectives on School-Based Issues, 13, 17–24. doi:10.1044/sbi13.1.17

53.

Scheeler

M. C.

Congdon

Stansbery

(2010). Providing immediate feedback to co-teachers through bug-in-ear technology: An effective method of peer coaching in inclusion classrooms. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33, 83–96. doi:10.1177/0888406409357013

54.

Sekerka

L. E.

Chao

(2003). Peer coaching as a technique to foster professional development in clinical ambulatory settings. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 23, 30–37.

55.

Showers

(1985). Teachers coaching teachers. Educational Leadership, 42, 43–49.

56.

Stitcher

J. P.

Lewis

T. J.

Richter

Johnson

N. W.

Bradley

(2006). Assessing antecedent variables: The effects of instructional variables on student outcomes through in-service and peer coaching professional development models. Education & Treatment of Children, 29, 665–692.

57.

Suda

K. T.

Miltenberger

R. G.

(1993). Evaluation of staff management strategies to increase positive interactions in a vocational setting. Behavioral Residential Treatment, 8, 69–88.

58.

Trivette

C. M.

Dunst

C. J.

Hamby

D. W.

O’Herin

C. E.

(2009). Characteristics and consequences of adult learning methods and strategies (Winterberry Research Syntheses Vol. 2, No. 2). Asheville, NC: Winterberry Press.

59.

Tschantz

Vail

(2000). Effects of peer coaching on the rate of responsive teacher statements during a child-directed period in an inclusive preschool setting. Teacher Education and Special Education, 23, 189–201. doi:10.1177/088840640002300302

60.

U. S. Department of Education. (2013, June). A survey on the use of funds under Title II, Part A. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/teacherqual/resources.html

61.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (2000, July). A guide to the individualized education program. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/parents/needs/speced/iepguide/index.html#writing

62.

Vail

Tschantz

Bevill

(1997). Dyads and data in peer coaching: Early childhood educators in action. Teaching Exceptional Children, 4, 11–15.

63.

Warr

Bunce

(1995). Trainee characteristics and the outcomes of open learning. Personnel Psychology, 48, 347–375.

64.

Wilson

K. P.

Dykstra

J. R.

Watson

L. R.

Boyd

B. A.

Crais

E. R.

(2012). Coaching in early education classrooms serving children with autism: A pilot study. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40, 97–105.

65.

Wong

E. K.

Yeung

A. S.

(2003). Evaluation of teacher development programs: Participant satisfaction and recommendation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 29, 57–66. doi:10.1016/S0191.491X(03)90005-8

66.

Yoon

K. S.

Duncan

Lee

S. W.

Scarloss

Shapley

K. L.

(2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007-No. 033). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Educational Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/southwest/pdf/REL_2007033.pdf

67.

Zwart

R. C.

Wubbels

Bergen

Bolhuis

(2009). Which characteristics of a reciprocal peer coaching context affect teacher learning as perceived by teachers and their students? Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 243–257.