Two sets of nonwords (with and without true morphemes) were compared for their ability to differentiate students in Grades 1 through 12 with and without language impairment (36 each; N = 72) on a nonword repetition task. Results indicated that either nonword type could contribute to differential diagnosis.
ArchibaldL.GathercoleS. (2006). Nonword repetition: A comparison of tests. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 970–983.
2.
CoadyJ. A.EvansJ. L. (2008). Uses and interpretations of non-word repetition tasks in children with and without specific language impairments (SLI). International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 43, 1–40.
3.
CoadyJ. A.EvansJ. L.KluenderK. R. (2010). The role of phonotactic frequency in nonword repetition by children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 45, 494–509.
4.
Conti-RamsdenG.DurkinK. (2007). Phonological short-term memory, language and literacy: Developmental relationships in early adolescence in young people with SLI. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 147–156.
DollaghanC.CampbellT. (1998). Nonword repetition and child language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1136–1146.
7.
Ellis WeismerS.TomblinJ. B.ZhangX.BuckwalterP.ChynowethJ.JonesM. (2000). Nonword repetition performance in school-age children with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 865–878.
8.
GathercoleS. E.BaddeleyA. (1990). Phonological memory deficits in language impaired children: Is there a causal connection?Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 336–360.
9.
GathercoleS. E.WillisC. S.BaddeleyA. D.EmslieH. (1994). The Children’s Test of Nonword Repetition: A test of phonological working memory. Memory, 2, 103–127.
10.
Graf EstesK.EvansJ.Else-QuestN. (2007). Differences in the nonword repetition performance of children with and without specific language impairment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 177–195.
11.
HanleyJ. A.McNeilB. J. (1983). A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology, 148, 839–843.
12.
MartonK. (2006). Do nonword repetition errors in children with specific language impairment reflect a weakness in an unidentified skill specific to nonword repetition or a deficit in simultaneous processing?Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 569–573.
13.
MastersonJ.LaxonV.CarnegieE.WrightS.HorslenJ. (2005). Nonword recall and phonemic discrimination in four- to six-year-old children. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 183–201.
14.
McKeanC.LettsC.HowardD. (2013). Developmental change is key to understanding primary language impairment: The case of phonotactic probability and nonword repetition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 1579–1594.
15.
MunsonB.EdwardsJ.BeckmanM. (2005). Relationships between nonword repetition accuracy and other measures of linguistic development in children with phonological disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 61–78.
16.
MunsonB.KurtzB.WindsorJ. (2005). The influence of vocabulary size, phonotactic probability, and wordlikeness on nonword repetition of children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1033–1047.
17.
NagyW.BerningerV.AbbottR. D. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147.
18.
NelsonN. W.Helm-EstabrooksN.HotzG.PlanteE. (2007). Test of Integrated Language and Literacy Skills (Beta research edition). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
19.
NelsonN. W.Helm-EstabrooksN.HotzG.PlanteE. (2011). Test of Integrated Language and Literacy Skills (Research edition 2.0). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
20.
SemelE.WiigE. H.SecordW. A. (2003). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
StorkelH. (2004). Methods for minimizing the confounding effects of word length on the analysis of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1454–1468.
23.
StorkelH.HooverJ. (2010). An on-line calculator to compute phonotactic probability and neighborhood density based on child corpora of spoken American English. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 497–506.
24.
VitevitchM. S.LuceP. A. (2004). A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 481–487.
