Alignment refers to the interactive use of similar words to accomplish a linguistic and cognitive “common ground” in conversations. Alignment is thought to be unconscious, relying on priming mechanisms. This occurs uniquely in conversational contexts and has been shown in choices of words, grammatical constructions, and even indirect language and gestures. This study reports a couple who demonstrated very little pretherapy alignment, using a couples-based approach. The client realized an increase in utterances and words, and no change in incoherent utterances. Her nonaphasic spouse increased his use of alignment. Naïve observers of therapy sessions perceived later sessions as more positive than earlier sessions.
BeckleyF.BestW.JohnsonF.EdwardsS.MaximJ.BeekeS. (2013). Conversation therapy for agrammatism: Exploring the therapeutic process of engagement and learning by a person with aphasia. International Journal of Communication Disorders, 48, 220–239.
2.
BeekeS.MaximJ.BestW.CooperF. (2011). Redesigning therapy for agrammatism: Initial findings from the ongoing evaluation of a conversation-based intervention study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24, 222–236.
3.
BeesonP.RobeyR. (2006). Evaluating single-subject treatment research: Lessons learned from the aphasia literature. Neuropsychological Review, 16, 161–169.
4.
BolesL. (1997). Conversation analysis as a dependent measure in communication therapy with four individuals with aphasia. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing, 2, 43–61.
5.
BolesL. (1998). Conversational discourse analysis as a method for evaluating progress in aphasia: A case report. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31, 261–274.
6.
BolesL. (2000). Aphasia therapy in a bilingual speaker: Treatment in language one with spousal support in language two. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing, 5, 137–142.
BolesL.LewisM. (2003). Working with couples: Solution focused aphasia therapy. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing, 8, 153–159.
9.
BrennanS.HannaJ. (2009). Partner-specific adaptation in dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 274–291.
10.
ClaytonM. (2012). What is entrainment? Definition and applications in musical research. Empirical Musicology Review, 7, 49–56.
11.
CunninghamR.WardC. (2003). Evaluation of a training programme to facilitate conversation between people with aphasia and their partners. Aphasiology, 17, 687–707.
12.
FoxS.ArmstrongE.BolesL. (2009). Conversational treatment in mild aphasia: A case study. Aphasiology, 23, 951–964.
13.
FrattaliC.ThompsonC.HollandA.WohlC.FerketicM. (1995). Functional assessment of communication skills for adults. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
14.
FridrikssonJ.HubbardH.HudspethS.HollandA.BonilhaL.FrommD.RordenC. (2012). Speech entrainment enables patients with Broca’s aphasia to produce fluent speech. Brain, 135, 3815–3829.
15.
GarrodS.PickeringM. (2004). Why is conversation so easy?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 8–11.
16.
GarrodS.PickeringM. (2009). Joint action, interactive alignment, and dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 292-304.
17.
GoudbeekM.KrahmerE. (2012). Alignment in interactive reference production: Content planning, modifier ordering, and referential overspecification. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 269–289.
18.
HollandA. (1991). Pragmatic aspects of intervention in aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 6, 197–211.
HoweT.DavidsonB.WorrallL.HershD.FergusonA.SherrattS.GilbertJ. (2012). “You needed to rehab . . . families as well”: Family members’ own goals for aphasia rehabilitation. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 47, 511–521.
21.
IwataT.WatanabeS. (2013). Influence relation estimation based on lexical entrainment in conversation. Speech Communication, 55, 329–339.
22.
JucksR.BeckerB.BrommeR. (2008). Lexical entrainment in written discourse: Is experts’ word use adapted to the addressee?Discourse Processes, 45, 497–518.
23.
KaganA.BlackS.DuchanJ.Simmons-MackieN.SquareP. (2001). Training volunteers as communication partners using “Supported Conversation for Adults With Aphasia” (SCA): A controlled trial. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 624–638.
24.
KerteszA. (2007). Western Aphasia Battery–Revised. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
25.
OelschlaegerM. L.DamicoJ. S. (2000). Partnership in conversation: A study of word search strategies. Journal of Communication Disorders, 33, 205–225.
26.
PaulD.FrattaliC.HollandA.ThompsonC.CapertonC.SlaterS. (2004). Quality of Communication Life Scale. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
27.
RocheJ.DaleR.CaucciG. (2012). Doubling up on double meanings: Pragmatic alignment. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 1–24.
28.
SherrattS.WorrallL.PearsonC.HoweT.HershD.DavidsonB. (2011). “Well it has to be language-related”: Speech-language pathologists’ goals for people with aphasia and their families. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 317–328.
29.
ShintelH.KeysarB. (2009). Less is more: A minimalist account of joint action. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 260–273.
30.
ShockleyK.RichardsonD.DaleR. (2009). Conversation and coordinative structures. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 305–319.
31.
Simmons-MackieN.KearnsK.PotechinG. (1987). Treatment of aphasia through family member training. In BrookshireR. (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings (pp. 106–116). Minneapolis, MN: BRK.
32.
Simmons-MackieN.KingstonD.SchultzM. (2004). “Speaking for another”: The management of participant frames in aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 114–127.
33.
WilkinsonR.BryanK.LockS.BayleyK.MaximJ.BruceC.. . . MoirD. (1998). Therapy using conversation analysis: Helping couples adapt to aphasia in conversation. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 33(Suppl. 1), 144–149.
34.
WorrallL.SherrattS.RogersP.HoweT.HershD.FergusonA.DavidsonB. (2011). What people with aphasia want: Their goals according to the ICF. Aphasiology, 25, 309–322.
