Strategies to Enhance the Informed Consent Process for Communication Disorders Researchers

Abstract

This tutorial addresses practical suggestions for enhancing the research activity experiences of persons with communication disorders. Based on the principles of the Belmont Report, this tutorial specifically addresses the informed consent process and document.

Keywords

legal/policy issues professional policy/licensure/certification research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Academy of Audiology. (2011a). Code of ethics. Retrieved from http://www.audiology.org/resources/documentlibrary/Pages/codeofethics.aspx

American Academy of Audiology. (2011b). Ethical practice guideline for relationships with industry for audiologists providing clinical care. Retrieved from http://www.audiology.org/about/membership/ethics/Documents/20140114_EPC_IndustryGuideline.pdf

American Academy of Audiology. (2011c). Guidelines for ethical practice in research for audiologists. Retrieved from http://www.audiology.org/resources/documentlibrary/Documents/2011_Research_Ethics_Guidelines.pdf

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2008). Ethics in research and scholarly activity [Issues in Ethics]. Retrieved from www.asha.org/policy

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2009). Guidelines for the responsible conduct of research: Ethics and the publication process [Guidelines]. Retrieved from www.asha.org/policy

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2010). Code of ethics. Available from http://www.asha.org/policy/ET2010-00309/

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2013). Ethical issues related to clinical services provided by audiology and speech-language pathology students [Issues in Ethics]. Retrieved from www.asha.org/policy

Bankert

E. A.

Amdur

R. J.

(2006). Institutional review board: Management and function (2nd ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.

Cascella

P. W.

(2007). Ethics and professional practice. In Paul

Cascella

(Eds.), Introduction to clinical methods in communication disorders (2nd ed., pp. 19–32). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

10.

Chabon

Morris

Lemoncello

(2011). Ethical deliberation: A foundation for evidence-based practice. Seminars in Speech and Language, 32, 298–308.

11.

Horner

Minifie

F. D.

(2011a). Research ethics I: Responsible conduct of research (RCR)-Historical and contemporary issues pertaining to human and animal experimentation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, S303–S329.

12.

Horner

Minifie

F. D.

(2011b). Research ethics II: Mentoring, collaboration, peer review, and data management and ownership. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, S330–S345.

13.

Horner

Minifie

F. D.

(2011c). Research ethics III: Publication practices and authorship, conflicts of interest, and research misconduct. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, S346–S362.

14.

Jakubowitz

, (2011). Ethical issues in a pediatric private practice. Seminars in Speech and Language, 32, 347–355.

15.

Kenny

Lincoln

Balandin

(2010). Experienced speech-language pathologists’ responses to ethical dilemmas: An integrated approach to ethical reasoning. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 121–134.

16.

Kummer

A. W.

Turner

(2011). Ethics in the practice of speech-language pathology in health care settings. Seminars in Speech and Language, 32, 330–337.

17.

Larsen

McMillin

(2011). Ethical issues in the conduct of research at a multidisciplinary clinic. Seminars in Speech and Language, 32, 338–346.

18.

Microsoft. (2007). Test your document’s readability. Retrieved from http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/word-help/test-your-document-s-readability-HP010148506.aspx?CTT=1

19.

Moss

S. E.

(2011). Promoting ethical research practices: Perspectives from pediatric populations. Seminars in Speech and Language, 32, 289–297.

20.

Suiter

D. M.

(2011). Ethical considerations for conducting clinical research. Perspectives on Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia), 20(2), 46–52.

21.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1979). The Belmont report. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html

22.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2009). Code of federal regulations. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html

23.

Watson

J. B.

Byrd

C. T.

Moore

B. J.

(2011). Ethics in stuttering treatment in the schools: Issues and intersections. Seminars in Speech and Language, 32, 319–329.