Nearly 25% of Deaf and Hard of Hearing (DHH) students come from homes where a language other than English is used and are known as English-Language Learners (ELLs). Evidence-based practices used to teach students who are DHH ELLs are imperative. To build an evidence-base, successful strategies must be examined across multiple researchers, sites, and participants. This research is a replication of an effective reading strategy; teaching vocabulary using repeated preteaching sessions paired with viewing American Sign Language books on DVD. Five participants with severe to profound hearing loss participated in this multiple-baseline design (ABC) across three sets of five vocabulary words study. Results indicated that after three sessions of preteaching and viewing the DVD, the majority of participants signed correctly 90% to 100% of the targeted vocabulary. Maintenance data were collected 1 to 5 weeks following the intervention. Implications for practitioners and researchers are discussed.
AugustD.CarloM.DresslerC.SnowC. (2005). The critical role of vocabulary development for English language learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 50–57.
4.
AugustD.ShanahanT. (Eds.). (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on language-minority children and youth. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
AvilaE.SadoskiM. (1996). Exploring new applications of the keyword method to acquire English vocabulary. Language Learning, 46, 379–395.
6.
BabbidgeH. D. (1965). Education of the deaf: A report to the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare by his Advisory Committee on the education of the deaf. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
7.
BannerA.WangY. (2011). An analysis of the reading strategies used by adult and student deaf readers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16, 2–23. doi:10.1093/deafed/enq027
8.
BarreraM.LiuK.ThurlowM.ChamberlainS. (2006). Use of chunking and questioning aloud to improve the reading comprehension of English language learners with disabilities (ELLs with Disabilities Report 17). Minneapolis: National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED495907
9.
BoudreaultP.MayberryR. (2006). Grammatical processing in American Sign Language: Age of first-language acquisition effects in relation to syntactic structure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 608–635.
10.
CannonJ. E.FredrickL. D.EasterbrooksS. R. (2010). Vocabulary instruction through books read in American Sign Language for English-language learners with hearing loss. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 31, 98–112. doi:10.1177/1525740109332832
11.
CannonJ. E.GuardinoC. (2012). Literacy strategies for deaf/hard of hearing ELLs: Where do we begin?Deafness & Education International, 14(2), 78–99. doi:10.1179/1557069X12Y.0000000006
12.
Commission on the Education for the Deaf. (1988, February). Toward equality. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
13.
CumminsJ. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.
14.
EasterbrooksS. R.BakerS. B. (2002). Language learning in children who are deaf and hard of hearing: Multiple pathways. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
FungP. C.ChowB. W. Y.McBride-ChangC. (2005). The impact of a dialogic reading program on deaf and hard-of-hearing kindergarten and early primary school-aged students in Hong Kong. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10(1), 82–95.
17.
Gerner de GarciaB. (1995). ESL applications for Hispanic deaf students. Bilingual Research Journal, 19, 457–467.
18.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179.
19.
JusticeL. (2002). Word exposure conditions and preschoolers’ novel word learning during shared storybook reading. Reading Psychology, 23, 87–106.
20.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from What Works Clearinghouse website: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf
21.
LoniganC. J.AnthonyJ. L.BloomfieldB. G.DyerS. M.SamwelC. S. (1999). Effects of two shared-reading interventions on emergent literacy skills of at-risk preschoolers. Journal of Early Intervention, 22, 306–322.
22.
LucknerJ. L.HandleyC. M. (2008). A summary of the reading comprehension research undertaken with students who are deaf or hard of hearing. American Annals of the Deaf, 153, 6–36.
23.
LucknerJ. L.SebaldA. M.CooneyJ.YoungJ.MuirS. G. (2005/2006). An examination of the evidence-based literacy research in deaf education. American Annals of the Deaf, 150, 443–456. doi:10.1353/aad.2006.0008
24.
MarscharkM.ConvertinoC.LaRockD. (2006). Optimizing academic performance of deaf students: Access, opportunities, and outcomes. In MooresD. F.MartinD. S. (Eds.), Deaf learners: New developments in curriculum and instruction (pp. 179–200). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
25.
MeierR. (1991, January/February). Language acquisition by deaf children. American Scientist, 79, 60–70.
26.
National Agenda Steering and Advisory Committee. (2005, April). National agenda: Moving forward on achieving educational equality for deaf and hard of hearing students. Available from http://www.ndepnow.org/
27.
National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. (2003). Identifying and implementing educational practices supported by rigorous evidence: A user-friendly guide. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
28.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
29.
National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education (ShavelsonR. J.TowneL., Eds.; Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
30.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq. (2002).
31.
PaddenC.RamseyC. (2000). American Sign Language and reading ability in deaf children. In ChamberlainC.MorfordJ. P.MayberryR. I. (Eds.), Language acquisition (pp. 165–190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
PaulP. (1996). Reading vocabulary knowledge and deafness. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1,3–15.
33.
PennoJ.WilkinsonI.MooreD. (2002). Vocabulary acquisition from teacher explanation and repeated listening to stories: Do they overcome the Matthew effect?Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 23–33.
34.
RobbinsC.EhriL. C. (1994). Reading storybooks to kindergartners helps them learn new vocabulary words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 54–64.
35.
SchirmerB. R.McGoughS. M. (2005). Teaching reading to children who are deaf: Do the conclusions of the National Reading Panel apply?Review of Educational Research, 75, 63–117. doi:10.3102/00346543075001083
36.
SpencerP. E.MarscharkM. (2010). Evidence-based practice in educating deaf and hard-of-hearing students. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
37.
TraxlerC. B. (2000). The Stanford Achievement Test, 9th edition: National norming and performance standards for deaf and hard of hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 337–348. doi:10.1093/deafed/5.4.337
38.
VaughnS.MathesP. G.Linan-ThompsonS.FrancisD. J. (2005). Teaching English language learners at risk for disabilities to read: Putting research into practice. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 58–67.
39.
WasikB. A.BondM. A. (2001). Beyond the pages of a book: Interactive book reading and language development in preschool classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 243–250.
40.
WinsorM. (2007). Bridging the language barrier in mathematics. Mathematics Teacher, 101, 372–378.
