A Field Study of Telepractice for School Intervention Using the ASHA NOMS K-12 Database

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to describe the characteristics and effectiveness of a telepractice speech-language therapy program for school-age children. Outcome data related to the caseload, type and amount of intervention, and student progress from a school-based telepractice therapy program were compared with the K-12 Schools National Outcomes Measurement System (NOMS) of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. NOMS provides data for students receiving intervention through direct, in-person service delivery models. The findings suggest many similarities between the characteristics of the telepractice and direct, in-person service delivery models. The telepractice service delivery model was effective for most students included in the study. Results of this study support the described telepractice service delivery model as a viable option for speech-language therapy services delivered to public school students with communication impairments. Limitations of this study are discussed with guidance provided for future research studies exploring the efficacy of speech-language therapy delivered via telepractice.

Keywords

elementary school age middle school age evidence-based practices applied research service delivery speech-language pathology technology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2003). National outcomes measurement system (NOMS): K–12 speech-language pathology user’s guide. Rockville, MD: Author.

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005). Speech-language pathologists providing clinical services via telepractice: Position statement. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/PRPSpecificTopic.aspx?folderid=8589934956&section=Key_Issues

Forducey

P. G.

(2006, August 15). Speech telepractice program expands options for rural Oklahoma schools. The ASHA Leader. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/Publications/leader/2006/060815/060815f/

Grogan-Johnson

Alvares

Rowan

Creaghead

(2010). A pilot study comparing the effectiveness of speech language therapy provided by telemedicine with conventional on-site therapy. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 16, 134–139.

Grogan-Johnson

Gabel

Taylor

Rowan

Alvares

Shenker

(2011). A pilot exploration of speech sound disorder intervention delivered by telehealth to school-age children. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 3, 31–41.

Hill

Theodoros

(2002). Research into telehealth applications in speech-language pathology. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 8, 187–196.

Houn

Trottier

(2006, November 28). Telepractice brings treatment to rural North Dakota. The ASHA Leader. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/Publications/leader/2006/061128/061128f/

Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act. (2004). Section 800 [c]8. Available from http://idea.ed.gov

Jacoby

Lee

Kummer

Levin

Creaghead

(2002). The number of individual treatment units necessary to facilitate functional communication improvements in the speech and language of young children. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 370–380.

10.

Juenger

(2009, September 22). Telepractice in schools: Virtual services help clinicians do more with less. The ASHA Leader. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/Publications/leader/2009/090922/090922f/

11.

Lewis

Packman

Onslow

Simpson

Jones

(2008). A phase II trial of telehealth delivery of the Lidcombe Program of early stuttering intervention. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 139–149.

12.

Mullen

Schooling

(2010). The National Outcomes Measurement System for pediatric speech-language pathology. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41, 44–60.

13.

Polovoy

(2008, July 15). Telepractice in schools helps address personnel shortages. The ASHA Leader, 13(9), 22–24.

14.

Semel

Wiig

Secord

(2003). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.

15.

Sicotte

Lehoux

Fortier-Blanc

Leblanc

(2003). Feasibility and outcome evaluation of a telemedicine application in speech-language pathology. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 13, 253–258.

16.

Theodoros

D. G.

(2008). Telerehabilitation for service delivery in speech-language pathology. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 14, 221–224.

17.

Waite

Theodoros

Russell

Cahill

(2009, April). Standardized assessment of pediatric language via a multi-media videoconferencing system. Paper presented at the convention of the American Telemedicine Association, Las Vegas, NV.

18.

Waite

M. C.

Cahill

L. M.

Theodoros

D. G.

Busuttin

Russell

T. G.

(2006). A pilot study of online assessment of childhood speech disorders. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 12, 92–94.

19.

Waite

M. C.

Theodoros

D. G.

Russell

T. G.

Cahill

L. M.

(2010). Assessment of children’s literacy via an Internet-based telehealth system. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41, 445–458.

20.

Wilson

Onslow

Lincoln

(2004). Telehealth adaptation of the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention: Five case studies. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 81–93.