A Comparison of Speech Sound Intervention Delivered by Telepractice and Side-by-Side Service Delivery Models

Abstract

Telepractice has the potential to provide greater access to speech-language intervention services for children with communication impairments. Substantiation of this delivery model is necessary for telepractice to become an accepted alternative delivery model. This study investigated the progress made by school-age children with speech sound impairments in side-by-side intervention compared with telepractice intervention. Fourteen children aged 6 through 10 years with identified speech sound disorders were randomly assigned to intervention delivered in a side-by-side or telepractice service delivery model. Intervention was provided twice a week for 30-min individual sessions during a 5-week summer intervention program. Children in both service delivery models made improvement in their speech sound production during the program. There were no significant differences between the two groups on postintervention assessments including standardized assessment and listener judgments of word productions. Measurements of treatment fidelity were also reported. The results of this study support the use of telepractice in the intervention of children’s speech sound disorders.

Keywords

speech/sound articulation technology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American National Standards Institute. (2002). Acoustical performance criteria, design requirements and guidelines for schools (ANSI S12.60–2002). Melville, NY: Author.

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005). Speech-language pathologists providing clinical services via telepractice: Position statement [Position statement]. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/docs/html/PS2005–00116.html

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2008a). Incidence and prevalence of communication disorders and hearing loss in children—2008 edition. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/research/reports/children.htm

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2008b). National Outcomes Measurement Scales K-12 2008 [National data report]. Available from www.asha.org

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2010). Profes-sional issues in Telepractice for speech-language pathologists [Professional issues statement]. Retrieved from www.asha.org/policy

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.). Frequently asked questions: Speech and language disorders in the school setting. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/public/speech/development/schoolsFAQ.htm

Beitchman

J. H.

Nair

Clegg

Ferguson

Patel

(1986). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in children with speech and language disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 25, 528–535.

Crowe

Deppe

Karr

(2008, March 25). State, national efforts address personnel shortages. The ASHA Leader. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/Publications/leader/2008/080325/080325d.htm

Edgar

Rosa-Lugo

(2007). The critical shortage of speech-language pathologists in the public school setting: Features of the work environment that affect recruitment and retention. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 38, 31–46.

10.

Forducey

(2006, August 15). Speech telepractice program expands options for rural Oklahoma schools. The ASHA Leader. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/Publications/leader/2006/060815/060815f.htm

11.

Gill

White

Green

Bird

(2011, August, 2). Addressing the shortage of school-based SLPs: An innovative approach in Texas. The ASHA Leader. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/Publications/leader/2011/110802/Addressing-the-Shortage-of-School-Based-SLPs–An-Innovative-Approach-in-Texas.htm

12.

Goldman

Fristoe

(2002). The Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation-2. Minneapolis, MN: American Guidance Service.

13.

Grogan-Johnson

Alvares

Rowan

L. E.

Creaghead

(2010). A pilot study comparing the effectiveness of speech-language intervention provided by telemedicine with conventional on-site therapy. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 16, 134–139.

14.

Grogan-Johnson

Gabel

Taylor

Rowan

Alvares

(2011). A pilot investigation of speech sound disorder intervention delivered by telehealth to school-age children. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 3, 31–41.

15.

Hill

Theodoros

(2002). Research into telehealth applications in speech-language pathology. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 8, 187–196.

16.

Houge

Geier

(2009). Delivering one-to-one tutoring in literacy via videoconferencing. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53, 154–163.

17.

Lewis

Packman

Onslow

Simpson

Jones

(2008). A phase II trial of telehealth delivery of the Lidcombe program of early stuttering intervention. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 139–149.

18.

Madsen

Shellsey

(2005, November). Using teleintervention to address the SLP shortage in North Dakota. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech Language Hearing Association Convention, San Diego, CA.

19.

McCauley

Swisher

(1984). Use and misuse of norm-referenced tests in clinical assessment: A hypothetical case. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 338–348.

20.

Ohio Department of Health. (2007). Hearing conservation programs policies for children requirements and recommendations. Retrieved from http://www.odh.ohio.gov/~/media/ODH/ASSETS/Files/cfhs/hearing%20and%20vision%20screening%20for%20children/hearingconservationprogramspoliciesforchildrenrequirementsandrecommendations.ashx

21.

Polovoy

(2008, July 15). Telepractice in schools helps address personnel shortages. The ASHA Leader. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/Publications/leader/2008/080715/080715e.htm

22.

Polycom

PVX.

(May, 2006). Pleasanton, CA: Polycom.

23.

Raitano

Pennington

Tunick

Boada

Shriberg

(2004). Pre-literacy skills of subgroups of children with speech sound disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 821–835.

24.

Secord

(1989). The traditional approach to treatment. In Creaghead

Newman

Secord

(Eds.), Assessment and remediation of articulatory and phonological disorders (2nd ed., pp. 127–157). Columbus, OH: Merrill.

25.

Semel

Wiig

Secord

(2004). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals–Fourth edition–Screening Test (CELF-4 screening test). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: The Psychological Corporation.

26.

Sicotte

Lehoux

Fortier-Blanc

Leblanc

(2003). Feasibility and outcome evaluation of a telemedicine application in speech-language pathology. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 9, 253–258.

27.

Wilson

Onslow

Lincoln

(2004). Telehealth adaptation of the Lidcombe program of early stuttering intervention: Five case studies. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 81–89.