This study investigated the effects of a scaffolded-language intervention using cloze procedures, semantically contingent expansions, contrastive word pairs, and direct models on speech abilities in two preschoolers with speech and language impairment speaking African American English. Effects of the lexical and phonological characteristics (i.e., word frequency, neighborhood density, and phonotactic probability) of contrastive word pairs and direct models on speech production accuracy were examined. Speech outcomes support the application of a scaffolded-language intervention with children with speech and language impairment. Results lend support to the assertion that fundamental intervention principles are applicable regardless of native dialect. Effects of word frequency, neighborhood density, and phonotactic probability clarified their role within the scaffolded-language intervention.
ApplebeeA. N. (1978). A child’s concept of story: Ages 2-17. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
BanksonN. W.BernthalJ. E. (1990). Bankson-Bernthal test of phonology. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
3.
BarlowJ. (2002). Recent advances in phonological theory and treatment: Part II. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 33, 4-8. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2002/001
4.
BeesonP.RobeyR. (2006). Evaluating single-subject treatment research: Lessons learned from the aphasia literature. Neuropsychological Review, 16, 161-169. doi:10.1007/s11065-006-9013-7
5.
Bellon-HarnM.HoffmanP.HarnW. (2004). Use of cloze and contrast word procedures on in repeated storybook reading: Targeting multiple domains. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37, 53-75. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2003.07.001
6.
BornsteinM.BrunerJ. (1989). On interaction. In BornsteinM.BrunerJ. (Eds.), Interaction in human development (pp. 1-13). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
BradshawM. L.HoffmanP. R.NorrisJ. A. (1998). Efficacy of expansions and cloze procedures in the development of interpretations by preschool children exhibiting delayed language development. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 29, 85-85.
8.
BrunerJ. S. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In SinclairA.JarvellaR. J.LeveltW. J. M. (Eds.), The child’s conception of language: Springer series in language and communication (pp.242-256). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
9.
BurgemeisterB. B.BlumL. H.LorgeI. (1972). Columbia Mental Maturity Scale–Revised. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Corporation.
10.
BuskP. L.SerlinR. C. (1992). Meta-analysis for single case research. In KratochwillT. R.LevinJ. R. (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 187-212). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
BybeeJ. (2001). Phonology and language use. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
12.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
ColtheartM. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497-505.
14.
CowleyJ. (1990a). Mrs. Wishy Washy. Bothell, WA: The Wright Group.
15.
CowleyJ. (1990b). Smarty Pants. Bothell, WA: The Wright Group.
16.
CowleyJ. (1990c). Who Will Be My Mother?Bothell, WA: The Wright Group.
17.
CowleyJ. (1990d). Dan, The Flying Man. Bothell, WA: The Wright Group.
18.
CraigH.ThompsonC.WashingtonJ.PotterS. (2003). Phonological features of child African American English. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 46, 623-635. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/049)
19.
CraigH.WashingtonJ. (2004). Grade-related changes in the production of African American English. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 47, 450-463.
20.
DawsonJ.StoutC.EyerJ. (2003). Structured Photographic Expressive Language Test -Third Edition (SPELT-3). DeKalb, IL: Janelle.
21.
Ellis-WeismerS.Murray-BranchJ.MillerJ. (1993). Comparison of two methods for promoting productive vocabulary in late talkers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 1037-1050.
22.
FeyM.CleaveP.RavadaA.LongS.DejmalA.EastonD. (1994). Effects of grammar facilitation on the phonological performance of children with speech and language impairments. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 594-607.
23.
GierutJ. (2001). Complexity in phonological treatment: Clinical factors. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 229-241.
24.
GierutJ. (2005). Phonological intervention: The how or the what? In KamhiA.PollockK. (Eds.), Phonological disorders in children: Clinical decision making in assessment and intervention (pp. 201-210). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
25.
GierutJ. A.ChampionA. H. (2001). Syllable onsets. II: Three-element clusters in phonological treatment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 886-904.
26.
GierutJ. A.MorrisetteM. L.ChampionA. (1999). Lexical constraints in phonological acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 26, 261-294.
27.
HartS.GonzalezL. (2010). The effectiveness of using communication-centered intervention to facilitate phonological learning in young children. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 32, 13-25. doi:10.1177/152574010933396
28.
HaskillA.TylerA. (2007). A comparison of linguistic profiles in subgroups of children with specific language impairment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 209-221. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2007/026)
29.
HoffmanP. R. (1992). Synergistic development of a phonetic skill. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 23, 254-260.
30.
HoffmanP. R.NorrisJ. A.MonjureJ. (1990). Comparison of process targeting and whole language treatments for phonologically delayed preschool children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 21, 102-109.
31.
HughesD.TillJ. (1982). A comparison of two procedures to elicit verbal auxiliary and copula in normal kindergarten children. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 47, 310-320.
32.
KaderavekJ.JusticeL. (2005). The effect of book genre in the repeated readings of mothers and their children with language impairment: A pilot investigation. Child Language Teaching & Therapy, 21, 75-92. doi:10.1191/026565900
33.
KamhiA. (2006). Treatment decisions for children with speech-sound disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 271-279. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2006/031)
34.
KirchnerD. (1991). Using verbal scaffolding to facilitate conversational participation and language acquisition in children with pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders, 14, 81-98.
35.
KromreyJ. D.Foster-JohnsonL. (1996). Determining the efficacy of intervention: The use of effect sizes for data analysis in single- subject research. Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 73-93.
36.
LuceP.PisoniD. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1-36.
MacWhinneyB. (2010b). Tools for analyzing talk- Electronic edition volume 1: Transcription format and programs, Part 2: The CLAN programs. Retrieved from http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/manuals/CLAN.pdf
39.
MaekawaJ.StorkelH. (2006). Individual differences in the influence of phonological characteristics on expressive vocabulary development by young children. Journal of Child Language, 33, 439-459.
40.
McReynoldsL.ThompsonC. (1986). Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs. Part I: Review of the basics of single-subject designs. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 51, 194-203.
41.
MelineT. (2010). Research in communication sciences and disorders (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
42.
MorrisetteM.GierutJ. (2002). Lexical organization and phonological change in treatment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 143-159. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2002/011)
43.
NorrisJ. A.HoffmanP. R. (1990). Language intervention within naturalistic environments. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 21, 72-84.
44.
OettingJ.McDonaldJ. (2002). Methods for characterizing participants’ nonmainstream dialect use in child language research. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 505-518. doi:10.1044/1092-438
45.
PearsonB.VellemanS.BryantT.CharkoT. (2009). Phonological milestones for African American English-speaking children learning mainstream American English as a second dialect. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 229-244.
46.
PisoniD.NusbaumH.LuceP.SlowiaczekL. (1985). Speech perception, word recognition, and the structure of the lexicon. Speech Communication, 4, 75-95.
47.
SeymourH. N. (1986). Clinical principles for language intervention disorders among nonstandard speakers of English. In TaylorO. (Ed.), Treatment of communication disorders in culturally and linguistically diverse populations (pp. 115-134). San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.
48.
SeymourH. N.RoeperT.de VilliersJ. G. (2005). Diagnostic Evaluation of Language Variation (DELV) norm-referenced. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
49.
ShribergL.AustinD.LewisB.McSweenyJ.WilsonD. (1997). The Percentage of Consonants Correct (PCC) metric extensions and reliability data. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 708-722.
50.
ShribergL.KwiatkowskiJ.BestS.HengstJ.Terselic-WeberB. (1986). Characteristics of children with phonologic disorders of unknown origin. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 140-161.
51.
ShribergL.TomblinB.McSweenyJ. (1999). Prevalence of speech delay in 6-year old children and comorbidity with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Disorders, 42, 1461-1481.
52.
SnowC. (1983). Literacy and language: Relationships during the preschool years. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 165-189.
53.
SnowC.Midkiff-BorundaS.SmallA.ProctorA. (1984). Therapy as social interaction: Analyzing the contexts for language remediation. Topics in Language Disorders, 4, 72-85.
54.
StockmanI. (2006). Alveolar bias in the final consonant deletion patterns of African American children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 85-95.
55.
StockmanI. (2008). Toward validation of a minimal competence phonetic core for African American children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 1244-1262. doi:10.1044/1092-438
56.
StockmanI. (2010). A review of developmental and applied language research on African American children: From a deficit to difference perspective on dialect differences. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41, 23-38. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0086)
57.
Stoel-GammonC. (1985). Phonetic inventories, 15-24 months: A longitudinal study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 505-512.
58.
StorkelH. (2004a). The emerging lexicon of children with phonological delays: Phonotactic constraints and probability in acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1194-1212. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2004/088)
59.
StorkelH. (2004b). Methods for minimizing the confounding effects of word length in the analysis of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1454-1468. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2004/108)
60.
StorkelH. L. (2001). Learning New Words: Phonotactic Probability in Language Development. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 1321-1337.
61.
StorkelH.HooverJ. (2010a). Word learning by children with phonological delays: Differentiating effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density. Journal of Communication Disorders, 43, 105-119. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.209.11.001
62.
StorkelH.HooverJ. (2010b). An on-line calculator to compute phonotactic probability and neighborhood density based on child corpora of spoken American English. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 497-506.
63.
StorkelH.Morrisette (2002). The lexicon and phonology: Interactions in language acquisition. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 33, 24-37.
64.
StorkelH.MaekawaJ.HooverJ. (2010). Differentiating the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on vocabulary comprehension and production: A comparison of preschool children with versus without phonological delays. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 933-949.
65.
TylerA. (2002). Language-based intervention for phonological disorders. Seminars in Speech and Language, 23, 069-082. doi:10.1055/s-2002-2351
66.
TylerA.LewisK.HaskillA.TolbertL. (2002). Efficacy and cross-domain effects of a morphosyntax and a phonology intervention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 33, 52-66. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2002/003)
67.
Van KleeckA.Vander WoudeJ.HammettL. (2006). Fostering literal and inferential language skills in head-start preschoolers with language impairment using scripted book-sharing discussions. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 85-95.
68.
VitevitchM.LuceP. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 374-408.
69.
WolframW. (1989). Structural variability in phonological development: Final nasals in vernacular Black English. In FasoldR.SchriffirinD. (Eds.), Current issues in linguistic theory: Language change and variation (pp. 301-332). New York, NY: Thieme.
70.
YoderP.SpruytenburgH.EdwardsA.DaviesB. (1995). Effect of verbal routine contexts and expansions on gains in the mean length of utterance in children with developmental delays. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 26, 21-32.
