This study considered the efficacy of a differentiated approach to vocabulary instruction for learners with word-finding difficulties (WFD) in the speech and language pathologist’s room. Using a pretest–posttest design to study treatment outcomes, 10 second graders with WFD received first semantic-based vocabulary instruction (S) and then semantic- and phonological-based vocabulary instruction (S & P). The S instruction focused on teaching only the semantic properties of words, whereas the S & P vocabulary instruction focused on teaching both semantic and phonological properties of words. Lexical factors of words taught were studied in reference to their influence on vocabulary instruction. Greater expressive language normalized gains were revealed for learners with WFD following the S & P approach to instruction as compared to the S approach. Phonotactic probability influenced success; learners found words consisting of common phoneme sequences easier to learn. Thus, for learners with WFD, expressive language learning was enhanced when form-based strategies were added to the semantic-based teaching paradigm.
ArcherA. L. (2008). Vocabulary instruction, Kindergarten. In Strategic literacy instruction, a video series featuring Dr. Anita Archer. Santa Rosa, CA: Sonoma County Office of Education. Retrieved from www.scoe.org
2.
BeckI. L.McKeownM. G.KucanL. (2002). Bringing words to life. New York, NY: Guilford.
3.
BestW. (2005). Investigation of a new intervention for children with word-finding problems. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 40, 279–318.
4.
BiemillerA.BooteC. (2006). An effective method for building meaning vocabulary in primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 44–62.
5.
BlachowiczC. L. Z.FisherP. (2004). Building vocabulary in remedial settings: Focus on word relatedness. Perspectives: Newsletter of the International Dyslexia Association, 30, 24–31.
6.
BrownA. S. (1991). A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 204–223.
7.
BurkeD. M.MacKayD. G.WorthleyJ. S.WadeE. (1991). On the tip of the tongue: What causes word-finding failures in young and older adults?Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 542–579.
8.
CampbellD. T.StanleyJ. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
9.
ConstableA.StackhouseJ.WellsB. (1997). Developmental word-finding difficulties and phonological processing: The case of the missing handcuffs. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 507-536.
10.
CoyneM.McCoachD.KappS. (2007). Vocabulary intervention for kindergarten students: Comparing extended instruction to embedded instruction and incidental exposure. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30(2), 74–88.
11.
DellG. S. (1982). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321.
12.
DunnL.DunnD. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
13.
EastonC.SheachS.EastonS. (1997). Teaching vocabulary to children with word-finding difficulties using a combined semantic and phonological approach: An efficacy study. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 13, 33–50.
14.
FaustM.DimitrovskyL.ShachtT. (2003). Naming difficulties in children with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 203–215.
15.
FontanaJ. L.ScruggsT.MastropieriM. A. (2007). Mnemonic strategy instruction in inclusive secondary social studies classes. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 345–355.
16.
GathercoleS. E.FrankishC. R.PickeringS. J.PeakerS. (1999). Phonotactic influences on short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 25, 84–95.
17.
GermanD. J. (1998, February). Prevalence estimates for word finding difficulties in LD students: Implications for assessment and instructional accommodations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Learning Disabilities Association, Washington, DC.
18.
GermanD. (2000). Test of Word Finding (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
19.
GermanD. J. (2002). A phonologically based strategy to improve word finding abilities in children. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 23, 179–192.
20.
GermanD. J. (2005). Word-Finding Intervention Program (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
21.
GermanD. J.NewmanR. S. (2004). The impact of lexical factors on children’s word-finding errors. Journal of Speech, Language, Hearing, and Research, 47, 624–636.
22.
HakeR. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64–74.
23.
JamesL. E.BurkeD. M. (2000). Phonological priming effects on word retrieval and tip-of-the-tongue experiences in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 26, 1378–1392.
24.
KuceraH.FrancisW. N. (1967). A computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
25.
LuengC. (2008). Preschoolers’ acquisition of scientific vocabulary through repeated read-aloud events, retellings, and hands-on science activities. Reading Psychology, 29, 165–193.
26.
LeveltW. M. J. (1989). Speaking, from intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
LeveltW. J. M. (1999). Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 223–232.
28.
LeveltW. J. M. (2001). Spoken word production: A theory of lexical access. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 98, 13464–13471. Retrieved from http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/98/23/13464
29.
LuceP. A.PisoniD. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear & Hearing, 19, 1–36.
30.
MacKayD. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
31.
McGregorK. K. (1994). Use of phonological information in word-finding treatment for children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 1381–1393.
32.
McGregorK. K.WindsorJ. (1996). Effects of priming on the naming accuracy of preschoolers with word-finding deficits. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1048–1058.
33.
MesserD.DockrellJ. E. (2006). Children’s naming and word-finding difficulties: Descriptions and explanations. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 49, 309–332.
34.
MesserD.DockrellJ. E.MurphyN. (2004). The relationship between naming and literacy in children with word-finding difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 462–470.
35.
MontgomeryJ. K. (2007a). The bridge of vocabulary. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessment.
36.
MontgomeryJ. K. (2007b). Evidence based strategies for vocabulary instruction/intervention. In DentiL.GuerinG. (Eds.), Effective practice for adolescents with reading and literacy challenges (pp. 25–43). New York, NY: Routledge.
37.
MooreD. S.McCabeG. P.CraigB. A. (2009). Introduction to the practice of statistics (6th ed.). New York, NY: Freeman.
38.
NagyW. E. (2007). Metalinguistic awareness and the vocabulary-comprehension connection. In WagnerR. K.MuseA. E.TannenbaumK. R. (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition, Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 52–103). New York, NY: Guilford.
39.
NagyW. E. (2009). Understanding words and word learning. In RosenfieldS.BerningerV. (Eds.), Implementing evidenced-based academic interventions in school settings (pp. 479–500). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
40.
NagyW. E.AndersonR. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English?Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304–330.
41.
NashH.SnowlingM. (2006). Teaching new words to children with poor existing vocabulary knowledge: A controlled evaluation of the definition and context methods. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 41, 335–354.
42.
NelsonN. W.Van MeterA. M. (2006). Finding the words: Vocabulary for young authors. In UkrainetzT. A. (Ed.), Contextualized language intervention (pp. 95–144). Eau Claire, WI: Thinking Publications.
43.
NewmanR. S.GermanD. J. (2002). Effects of lexical factors on lexical access among typical language-learning children and children with word-finding difficulties. Language & Speech, 43, 285–317.
44.
NippoldM. M.SchwarzL. E. (2002). Do children recover from specific language impairment?International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 41–49.
45.
ScottC. M. (2002). A fork in the road less traveled: Writing intervention based on language profile. In ButlerK.SillimanE. (Eds.), Speaking, reading, and writing in children with language learning disabilities (pp. 219–237). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
SemelE.WiigE. H.SecordW. A. (2003). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, Fourth Edition (CELF-4). Toronto, Canada: Psychological Corp./Harcourt Assessment.
47.
ShengL.McGregorK. K. (2010). Lexical–semantic organization in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 53, 146–159.
48.
SiegelS.CastellanN. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
49.
SmithS. W.DaunicA. P.TaylorG. G. (2007). Treatment fidelity in applied educational research: Expanding the adoption and application of measures to ensure evidence-based practice. Education and Treatment of Children, 3(4), 121–134.
50.
StorkelH. L. (2001). Learning new words: Phonotactic probability in language development. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 1321–1337.
51.
StorkelH.MorrisetteM. L. (2002). The lexicon and phonology: Interactions in language acquisition. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 33, 24–37.
52.
UbertiH. Z.ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (2003). Keywords make the difference! Mnemonic instruction in inclusive classrooms. Teaching Exceptional Children, 10(3), 56–61.
53.
VitevitchM. S.LuceP. A. (2004). A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 481–487.
54.
WallachG. P. (2008). Language intervention for school-age students: Setting goals for academic success. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier.
55.
WrightS. H. (1993). Teaching word-finding strategies to severely language-impaired children. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 28, 165–175.
