This study explored how a school-based speech—language pathologist implemented a classroom-based service delivery model that focused on collaborative practices in classroom settings. The study used ethnographic observations and interviews with 1 speech—language pathologist to provide insights into how she implemented collaborative consultation and classroom-based intervention service delivery models. Five themes emerged: service delivery, curriculum-based intervention, scheduling, collaboration, and advocacy. Though the participant implemented a full range of service delivery models, findings provide helpful ideas for others implementing inclusive and collaborative practices in classroom settings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. ( 1991). A model for collaborative service delivery for students with language-learning disorders in the public schools. ASHA , 33(Suppl. 5), 44—50.
Apel, K. (1999). Checks and balances: Keeping science in our profession. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 98—107.
5.
Bland, L.E., & Prelock, P.A. (1995). Effects of collaboration on language performance . Journal of Children's Communication Development, 17, 31—37.
6.
Blosser, J. (2002, October). Expanding service delivery models. Presentation at the meeting of the Iowa Speech Language Hearing Association, Des Moines, IA.
7.
Blosser, J.L., & Kratcowski, A. (1997). PACs: A framework for determining appropriate service delivery options. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 28, 99—107.
8.
Borsch, J.C., & Oaks, R. (1992). Clinical forum: Implementing collaborative consultation. Effective collaboration at Central Elementary School. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 23, 367—368.
9.
Catts, H.W., Adlof, S.M., & Weismer, S.E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 49(2), 278—293.
10.
Catts, H.W., & Kamhi, A.G. (1999). Language and reading disabilities. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
11.
Cazden, C.B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann .
12.
Coufal, K.L. (1990). Collaborative consultation: An alternative to traditional treatment for children with communicative disorders. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(02), 694A.
13.
Coufal, K.L. (1993). Collaborative consultation for speech—language pathologists. Topics in Language Disorders, 14(1), 1—14.
14.
Coufal, K.L. (2002). Technology teaching or mediated learning, Part I: Are computers Skinnerian or Vygotskian?Topics in Language Disorders, 22(4), 1—28.
15.
Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
DeKemel, K. (2003). Intervention in language arts: A practical guide for speech—language pathologists. Philadelphia, PA : Butterworth Heinemann.
17.
Ehren, B. (2000). Maintaining a therapeutic focus and sharing responsibility for student success: Keys to in-classroom speech— language services . Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools,31, 219—229.
18.
Friend, M., & Bursuck, W.D. (2002). Including students with special needs: A practical guide for classroom teachers (3rd ed.). Need-ham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
19.
Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2003). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (4th ed.). Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
Idol, L. (2006). Toward inclusion of special education students in general education: A program evaluation of eight schools. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 77—94.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq (1990) (amended 1997)
24.
Larson, V., & McKinley, N. (2003). Communication solutions for older students. Eau Claire, WI: Thinking.
25.
Lenz, B.K. (2006). Creating school-wide conditions for high-quality learning strategy classroom instruction. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 261—266.
26.
Liles, B.Z. (1985). Cohesion in the narratives of normal and language-disordered children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 123—133.
27.
Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., Graetz, J., Norland, J., Gardizi, W., & McDuffie, K. (2005). Case studies in co-teaching in the content areas: Successes, failures, and challenges. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40(5), 260—270.
28.
Messer, D., & Dockrell, J. (2006). Children's naming and word-finding difficulties: Descriptions and explanations. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 49, 309—324.
29.
Nation, K., Clarke, P., & Marshall, C.M. (2004). Hidden language impairments in children: Parallels between poor reading comprehension and specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research,47, 199—211.
30.
Pena, E., & Quinn, R. (2003). Developing effective collaboration teams in speech—language pathology. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 24(2), 53—63.
31.
Prelock, P.A., Miller, B.L., & Reed, N.L. (1995). Collaborative partnerships in a language in the classroom program. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 26, 286—290.
32.
Rea, P.J. (2005). 20 ways to engage your administrator in your collaboration initiative. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40(5), 312—316.
33.
Salend, S. (2005). Creating inclusive classrooms: Effective and reflective practices for all students (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
34.
Silliman, E.R., Ford, C.S., Beasman, J., & Evans, D. (1999). An inclusion model for children with language learning disabilities: Building classroom partnerships. Topics in Language Disorders, 19(3), 1—8.
35.
Spencer, S.A. (2005). The practicalities of collaboration and special education service delivery. Intervention in School and Clinic , 40(5), 296—300.
36.
Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. (1984). A rationale for the merger of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 51, 102—111.
37.
Stake, R. (1995). The art of the case study. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
Sturm, J.M., & Nelson, N.W. (1997). Formal classroom lesson: New perspectives on a familiar discourse event. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools,28, 255—273.
39.
Throneburg, R.N., Calvert, L.K., Sturm, J.J., Paramboukas, A.A., & Paul, P.J. (2000). A comparison of service delivery models: Effects on curricular vocabulary skills in the school setting. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 9(1), 10—20.
40.
Wallach, G.P., & Ehren, B.J. (2004). Collaborative models of instruction and intervention: Choices, decisions, and implementation. In E. R. Silliman & L. C. Wilkinson (Eds.), Language and literacy learning in schools (pp. 239—272). New York: Guilford Press.
41.
Walther-Thomas, C., Korinek, L., & McLaughlin, V.L. (1999). Collaboration to support students' success. Focus onExceptional Children, 32(3), 1—18.
42.
Weiner, I., & Murawski, W.W. (2005). Schools attuned: A model for collaborative intervention. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40(5), 284—290.
43.
Wilkinson, L.C., & Silliman, E.R. (2000). Classroom language and literacy learning. In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson , & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 337— 360). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
