This study examined aspects of self-assessment, a metacognitive ability, and oral narrative production in 401 children between 5 and 12 years of age. Oral narrative production was evaluated through the administration of the Test of Narrative Language (TNL). Self-assessment of narrative performance was determined by asking children to self-evaluate their ability to “tell a good story” by pointing to one of five pictures from a “very happy face” (rating of 5) to a “very sad face” (rating of 1). Analysis of the data demonstrated that (a) older children (≥ 10 years of age) were more accurate than younger children in their ability to self-evaluate narrative performance; (b) there was a significant difference in narrative production skills between children who rated themselves as poor performers (self-rating of 1 or 2) and children who were high self-raters (≥ 3); (c) narrative self-evaluation varied in relation to gender, with males tending to more frequently overestimate their narrative ability; and (d) children with poor narrative ability were more likely to overestimate the quality of their narrative production than good narrators were. Clinical implications and future directions are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alvarez, V., & Adelman, H.S. (1986). Overstatements of self-evaluation by students with psychoeducational problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 19, 567—571.
2.
Apel, K. (1999). An introduction to assessment and intervention with older students with language-learning impairments: Bridges from research to clinical practice. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 228—230.
3.
Assor, A., & Connell, J.P. (1992). The validity of students' self-reports as measures of performance affecting self-appraisals. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 25—47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65—116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
Butler, R. (1990). Conditions on self-assessment at different ages . Child Development, 61, 201—210.
6.
Byrne, B.M. (1984). The general/academic self-concept nomological network: A review of construct validation research. Review of Educational Research, 54, 427—456.
7.
Cox, B.E., Fang, Z., & Otto, B.W. (1997). Preschoolers' developing ownership of the literate register. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 34—53.
8.
Englert, C.S., Raphael, T., Anderson, L., Anthony, H., Stevens, D., & Fear, K. (1991). Making strategies and self-talk visible: Writing instruction in regular and special education classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 337—372.
9.
Fang, Z. (2001). The development of schooled narrative competence among second graders. Reading Psychology, 22, 205—223.
10.
Fang, Z., & Cox, B.E. (1999). Emergent metacognition: A study of preschoolers' literate behavior. Journal of Research in Childhood Education , 13, 175—185.
11.
Fegans, L., & Short, E.J. (1984). Developmental differences in the comprehension and production of narratives by reading-disabled and normally achieving children . Child Development, 55, 1727—1736.
12.
Fey, M., Catts, H., & Larrivee, L. (1995). Preparing preschoolers for the academic and social challenges of school. In M. Fey, J. Windsor, & S. Warren (Eds.), Language intervention: Preschool through the elementary years (pp. 3—37). Baltimore: Brookes .
13.
Ford, M. (1992). Motivating humans: Goals, emotions, and personal agency beliefs. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
Gillam, R.B., & Johnston, J.R. (1992). Spoken and written language relationships in language/learning-impaired and normally achieving school-age children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1303—1315.
15.
Gillam, R.B., McFadden, T.U., & van Kleeck, A. (1995). Improving the narrative abilities of children with language disorders: Whole language and language skills approaches. In M. Fey, J. Windsor, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communication intervention for school-age children (pp. 145—182). Baltimore: Brookes .
16.
Gillam, R.B., & Pearson, N. (2004). Test of narrative language. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
17.
Gourgey, A.F. (2001). Metacognition in basic skills instruction. In H. J. Hart-man (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 17—32). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
18.
Graves, A., & Montague, M. (1991). Using story grammar cueing to improve the writing of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 6, 246—250.
19.
Greenhalgh, K.S., & Strong, C.J. (2001). Literate language features in spoken narratives of children with typical language and children with language impairments. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 114—125.
20.
Hayward, D., & Schneider, P. (2000). Effectiveness of teaching story grammar knowledge to pre-school children with language impairment. An exploratory study. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 16, 255—284.
21.
Hudson, J.A., & Shapiro, L.R. (1991). From knowing to telling: The development of children's scripts, stories, and personal narratives. In A. McCabe & C. Peterson (Eds.), Developing narrative structure (pp. 89—135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22.
Idol, L. (1987). Group story mapping: A comprehensive strategy for both skilled and unskilled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 196—205.
23.
Idol, L., & Croll, V.J. (1987). The effects of training in story mapping procedures on the reading comprehension of poor readers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 214—230.
24.
Jacobs, J., & Paris, S. (1987). Children's metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist , 22, 255—278.
25.
Justice, L.M., & Kaderavek, J.N. (2004). Embedded-explicit emergent literacy intervention I: Background and description of approach. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35, 201—211.
26.
Kaderavek, J.N., & Justice, L.M. (2004). Embedded-explicit emergent literacy intervention II: Goal selection and implementation in the early childhood classroom. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35, 212—228.
27.
Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121—1134.
28.
Licht, B.G. (1992). The achievement-related perceptions of children with learning problems: A developmental analysis. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 247—264). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29.
Liles, B.Z. (1993). Narrative discourse in children with language disorders and children with normal language: A critical review of the literature . Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 868—882.
30.
Lyon, G.R. (1999). Keys to successful learning: A national summit on research in learning disabilities. Retrieved August 17, 2005, from http://www.ldonline.org/ld_indepth/reading/ncld_summit99.html
31.
Lyon, G. R., & Krasnegor, N. A. (Eds.). (1996). Attention, memory, and executive function. Baltimore: Brookes.
32.
McCormick, C.B., Busching, B.A., & Potter, E.F. (1992). Children's knowledge about writing: The development and use of evaluative criteria. In M. Pressley , K. R. Harris, & J. T. Guthrie (Eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy in schools (pp. 311—336). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
33.
McFadden, T.U. (1998). The immediate effects of pictographic drafting on children's narratives. Child Language Teaching and Therapy , 14, 51—67.
34.
McFadden, T.U., & Gillam, R. (1996). An examination of the quality of narratives produced by children with language disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 27, 48—57.
35.
McFadden, T.U., & Sheldon, M. (1996, November). Increasing student awareness of narrative quality through holistic scoring training. Poster presentation at the ASHA annual convention, Seattle, WA.
36.
McKenna, M.C., & Kear, D.J. (1990). Measuring attitude toward reading: A new tool for teachers. ReadingTeacher, 43, 626—639.
37.
Meece, J.L., & Courtney, D.P. (1992). Gender differences in students' perceptions: Consequences for achievement-related goals. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 209—228). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38.
Meece, J.L., Parsons, J.E., Kaczala, C.M., Goff, S.B., & Futterman, R. (1982). Sex differences in math achievement: Towards a model of academic choice. Psychological Bulletin,91, 324—348.
39.
Merritt, D.D., & Liles, B.Z. (1989). Narrative analysis: Clinical applications of story generation and story retelling. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 429—438.
40.
Miller, A. (1987). Changes in academic self-concept in early school years: The role of conceptions of ability. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 2, 551—558.
41.
Montague, M., Graves, A., & Leavell, A. (1991). Planning, procedural facilitation, and narrative composition of junior high students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 6, 219—224.
42.
Morrow, L.M., O'Connor, E.M., & Smith, J.K. (1990). Effects of a story reading program on the literacy development of at-risk kindergarten children. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 255—275.
43.
Muñoz, M.L., Gillam, R.B., Peña, E.D., & Gulley-Faehnle, A. (2003). Measures of language development in fictional narratives of Latino children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 332—342.
44.
Nicholls, J.G. (1978). The development of the concepts of effort and ability, perception of academic attainment, and the understanding that difficult tasks require more ability. Child Development, 49, 800—814.
45.
Nicholls, J.G. (1979). Development of perception of own attainment and causal attributions for success and failure in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 94—99.
46.
Pallier, G. (2003). Gender differences in the self-assessment of accuracy on cognitive tasks. Sex Roles, 48, 265—276.
47.
Parsons, J.E., Meece, J.L., Adler, T.F., & Kaczala, C.M. (1982). Sex differences in attributions and learned helplessness . Sex Roles, 8, 421—432.
48.
Peterson, P.L., & Swing, S.R. (1983). Problems in classroom implementation of cognitive strategy instruction. In M. Pressley & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: Educational applications (pp. 267—287). New York: Springer-Verlag.
49.
Pintrich, P.R., & Schunk, D.H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: MerrillPrentice Hall.
50.
Pressley, M., & Woloshyn, V. (1995). Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children's academic performance (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
51.
Ripich, D.N., & Griffith, P.L. (1988). Narrative abilities of children with learning disabilities and nondisabled children: Story structure, cohesion, and propositions. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 21, 165—173.
52.
Rosenshine, B. (1976). Recent research on teaching behaviors and student achievement. Elementary School Journal, 27, 61—64.
53.
Ross, J.A., Rolheiser, C., & Hogaboam-Gray, A. (1999). Effects of self-evaluation training on narrative writing. Assessing Writing, 6, 107—132.
54.
Roth, F.P., & Spekman, N.J. (1986). Narrative discourse: Spontaneously generated stories of learning-disabled and normally achieving students. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 8—23.
55.
Schraw, G. (2001). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. In H. J. Hart-man (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 3—16). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
56.
Schunk, D.H. (1992). Theory and research on student perceptions in the classroom. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 3—24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
57.
Schunk, D.H. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children's cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal , 33, 359—382.
58.
Scott, C.M., & Windsor, J. (2000). General language performance measures in spoken and written narrative and expository discourse of school-age children with language learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 324—339.
59.
Shuell, T.J. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 411—436.
60.
Singer, B.D., & Bashir, A.S. (1999). What are executive functions and self-regulation and what do they have to do with language-learning disorders?Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 265—273.
61.
Stipek, D.J. (1981). Children's perceptions of their own and their classmates' ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 404—410.
62.
Stone, C.A. (1997). Correspondences among parent, teacher, and student perceptions of adolescents' learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 660—669.
63.
Stone, C.A., & May, A.L. (2002). The accuracy of academic self-evaluations in adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 35, 370—383.
64.
Sulzby, E. (1985). Children's emergent reading of favorite storybooks: A developmental study. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 458—481.
65.
Sulzby, E., & Teale, W.H. (1991). Emergent literacy. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 727—757). New York: Longman.
66.
Ukrainetz, T.A. (1998). Stickwriting stories: A quick and easy narrative representational strategy. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 29, 197—206.
67.
van Kleeck, A. (1987). Foreword: The metas: Implications for the language impaired. Topics in Language Disorders, 7, vi—vii.
68.
Westby, C.E. (1985). Learning to talk, talking to learn: Oral-literate language differences. In C. S. Simon (Ed.), Communication skills and classroom success: Therapy methodologies for language—learning disabled students (pp. 181—213). Boston: College-Hill Press.
69.
Westby, C.E. (1999). Assessing and facilitating text comprehension . In H. W. Catts & A. G. Kahmi (Eds.), Language and reading disabilities (pp. 154—221). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
70.
Willingham, D.T. (2003—2004). Why students think they understand— when they don't. American Educator. Retrieved August 17, 2005, from http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_educator/winter03-04/cognitive.html
71.
Wong, B., & Wong, R. (1986). Study behavior as a function of metacognitive knowledge about critical task variables: An investigation of above average, average, and learning disabled readers. Learning Disabilities Research, 1, 101—111.
