In this clinical exchange, the authors discuss acoustic accessibility and sound-field amplification in general education classrooms. They bridge theory to practice by presenting preliminary information from two different school systems demonstrating how an improved signal-to-noise ratio can have a positive impact on special education referrals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American National Standards Institute. (2002 ). American national standard acoustical performance criteria, design requirements and guidelines for schools (Report No. ANSI S1260-2002) . Available from www.asa.aip.org
2.
Anderson, K.L. (2001, April). Voicing concern about noisy classrooms . Educational Leadership, pp. 77—79.
3.
Berg, F.S. (1993). Acoustics and sound systems in schools. San Diego, CA: Singular.
4.
Berlin, C.I., & Weyand, T.G. (2003). The brain and sensory plasticity: Language acquisition and hearing. New York: Thomson Delmar Learning.
5.
Boothroyd, A. (1997). Auditory development of the hearing child. ScandinavianAudiology, 26(Suppl. 46), 9—16.
6.
Boothroyd, A. (2002, April). Optimizing FM and sound-field amplification in the classroom. Paper presented at the American Academy of Audiology National Convention, Philadelphia .
7.
Chermak, G.D., & Musiek, F.E. (1997). Central auditory processing disorders: New perspectives . San Diego, CA: Singular.
8.
Crandell, C.C., & Smaldino, J.J. (1996). Speech perception in noise by children for whom English is a second language. American Journal ofAudiology, 5(3), 47—51.
9.
Crandell, C.C., Smaldino, J.J., & Flexer, C. (1995). Sound-field FM amplification: Theory and practical applications. San Diego, CA: Singular .
10.
Erber, N. (1982). Auditory training. Washington, DC: AlexanderGrahamBell Association for the Deaf.
11.
Flexer, C. (1998). Enhancing classrooms for listening, language, and literacy [Videotape]. (Available from The Educational Audiology Association, 4319 Ehrlich Rd., Tampa, FL 33624)
12.
Flexer, C. (1999). Facilitating hearing and listening in young children (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Singular.
13.
Knittel, M.A.L., Myott, B., & McClain, H. (2002). Update from Oakland schools sound-field team: IR vs. FM. Educational Audiology Review, 19(2), 10—11.
14.
Leavitt, R.J., & Flexer, C. (1991). Speech degradation as measured by the Rapid Speech Transmission Index (RASTI). Ear and Hearing, 12, 115— 118.
15.
Ling, D. (2002). Speech and the hearing impaired child (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: AlexanderGrahamBell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing.
16.
Musiek, F.E., & Berge, B.E. (1998). A neuroscience view of auditory training/ stimulation and central auditory processing disorders. In M. G. Masters, N. A. Stecker, & J. Katz (Eds.), Central auditory processing disorders: Mostly management (pp. 15—32). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
17.
Robertson, L. (2000). Literacy learning for children who are deaf or hard of hearing. Washington, DC: AlexanderGrahamBell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing.
18.
Rosenberg, G.G., Blake-Rahtner, P., Heavner, J., Allen, L., Redmond, B.M., Phillips, J., et al. (1999). Improving classroom acoustics (IAC): A three-year FM sound-field classroom amplification study. Journal of Educational Audiology, 7(3), 8—28.
19.
Sorenson, R. (2001). Preventing early learning failure. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
20.
Universal design: Ensuring access to the general education curriculum. (1999). Research Connections in Special Education , 5, 1—2.
