This article examines the views of incarcerated and nonincarcerated female adolescents about their performance in and knowledge of communication. Forty-six participants, who ranged in age from 15 to 17 years and were of similar socioeconomic status, were surveyed on two 20-item questionnaires about pragmatic practices that govern conversational interactions. Overall, the results indicated similar findings for the two groups on pragmatic practices. The views of the incarcerated teenagers suggested they did not perceive themselves as having problems with their own performance concerning conversational behaviors. No statistically significant differences between the groups were found on knowledge of the rules governing conversational practices according to societal dictates. Implications for dynamic assessment and intervention are discussed, and service delivery models, metapragmatics, and the role of communication are addressed. In addition, topics in which incarcerated adolescents choose to engage are discussed for the purpose of planning intervention programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aram, D., Morris, R., & Hall, N.E. (1993). Clinical and research congruence in identifying children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 580—591.
2.
Baltaxe, C.A.M. (2000). Emotional, behavioral, and other psychiatric disorders of childhood associated with communication disorders. In T. L. Layton, E. Crais, & L. R. Watson (Eds.), Language impairment in children: Nature (pp. 39—78). Albany, NY: Delmar.
3.
Benner, G.J., Nelson, R.J., & Epstein, M.H. (2002). The language skills of children with emotional and behavioral disorders: A review of the literature. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 43—56.
4.
Budoff, M. (1987). The validity of learning potential assessment . In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment (pp. 52—81). New York: Guilford Press.
5.
Campione, J.C., & Brown, A.L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement . In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment (pp. 82— 115). New York: Guilford Press.
6.
Coufal, K.L. (1993). Collaboratve consultation for speech-language pathologists. Topics in Language Disorders, 14(1), 1—14.
7.
Cozad, R., & Rousey, C. (1966). Hearing and speech disorders among delinquent children. Corrective Psychiatry and Journal of Social Therapy , 12, 250—255.
8.
Davis, A.D., Sanger, D.D., & Morris-Friehe, M. (1991). Language skills of delinquent and nondelinquent adolescent males. Journal of Communication Disorders, 24, 251—266.
9.
Donahue, M.L., Hartas, D., & Cole, D. (1999). Research on interactions among oral language and emotional/behavioral disorders. In D. L. Rogers-Adkinson & P. L. Griffith (Eds.), Communication disorders and children with psychiatric and behavioral disorders (pp. 69—97). San Diego, CA: Singular.
10.
Falconer, K.O., & Cochran, J.R. (1989). Communication skills in male institutionalized juvenile offenders. Rocky MountainJournal of Communication Disorders, 5, 45—54.
11.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Mogen, R.J., Jensen, M.R., Kaniel, S., & Tzuriel, D. (1987). Prerequisites for assessment of learning potential . In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment (pp. 35—51). New York: Guilford Press.
12.
Gallagher, T.M. (1999). Interrelationships among children's language, behavior, and emotional problems. Topics in Language Disorders , 19, 1—15.
13.
Giddian, J. (1991). School children with emotional problems and communication deficits: Implications for speech-language pathologists. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 22, 291—295.
14.
Gottfredson, D. (2001). Schools and delinquency. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Ishii-Jordan, S.R., & Maag, J.W. (1999). Therapeutic implications for children with emotional or behavioral disorders and concomitant language disorders. In D. L. Rogers-Adkinson & P. L. Griffith (Eds.), Communication disorders and children with psychiatric and behavioral disorders (pp. 343—366). San Diego, CA: Singular.
16.
Jitendra, A.K., & Kameenui, E.J. (1993). Dynamic assessment as a compensatory assessment approach: A description and analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 14(5), 6—18.
17.
Larson, V.L., & McKinley, N. (1995). Language disorders in older students: Preadolescents and adolescents. Eau Claire, WI: Thinking Publications.
18.
McCauley, R.J. (1996). Familiar strangers: Criterion-referenced measures in communication disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 27, 122—131.
19.
Nelson, M.C. (1987). Handicapped offenders in the criminal justice system. In M. C. Nelson, R. B. Rutherford, Jr., & B. I. Wolford (Eds.), Special education in the criminal justice system (pp. 120—137). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
20.
Olswang, L.B., & Bain, B.A. (1996). Assessment information for predicting upcoming change in language production. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39(2), 414—424.
21.
Paul, R. (2001). Language disorders from infancy through adolescence: Assessment & intervention (2nd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book.
22.
Peña, E., Iglesias, A., & Lidz, C.S. (2001). Reducing test bias through dynamic assessment of children's word learning ability. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10(2), 138—153.
23.
Plante, E. (1996). Observing and interpreting behaviors: An introduction to the clinical forum. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 27, 99—101.
24.
Plante, E. (1998). Criteria for SLI: The Stark and Tallal legacy and beyond. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research , 41, 951—957.
25.
Rand, Y., & Kaniel, S. (1987). Group administration of the LAPD. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment (pp. 196—214). New York: Guilford Press.
26.
Sabers, D.L. (1996). By their tests we will know them. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 27, 102—108.
27.
Sanger, D.D., Creswell, J.W., Dworak, J., & Schultz, L. (2000). Cultural analysis of communication behaviors among juveniles in a correctional facility. Journal of Communication Disorders, 33, 31—57.
28.
Sanger, D.D., Hux, K., & Ritzman, M. (1999). Female juvenile deliquents' pragmatic awareness of conversational interactions. Journal of Communication Disorders , 32, 281—295.
29.
Sanger, D., Moore-Brown, B., Magnuson, G., & Svoboda, N. (2001). Prevalence of language problems among adolescent delinquents: A closer look. Communication Disorders Quarterly , 23, 17—26.
30.
Sanger, D., Moore-Brown, B., Rezac, C., Montgomery, J., & Keller, H. (2003). Female incarcerated adolescents with language problems talk about their own communication behaviors and learning. Manuscript submitted for publication.
31.
Sautter, C.R. (1995, January). Standing up to violence. Phi Delta Kappan,K1—K11.
32.
Schneider, P., & Watkins, R.V. (1996). Applying Vygotskian developmental theory to language intervention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools , 27(2), 157—170.
33.
Schubert, R., & Gates, M. (1990). Making the grade: A report card on American youth . Washington, DC: National Collaboration for Youth.
34.
Simon, C.S. (1998). When big kids don't learn: Contextual modifications and intervention strategies for age 8-18 at-risk students. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 12, 249—280.
35.
Stricker, L.J. (1988). Measuring social status with occupational information: A simple method. Journal of Applied Psychology, 18, 423—437.
36.
Taylor, J.S. (1969). The communicative abilities of juvenile delinquents: A descriptive study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri, Kansas City.
37.
Westby, C.E., Dominguez, M.S., & Oetter, P. (1996). A performance/ competence model of observational assessment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools , 27, 144-156.
38.
Wiig, E.H. (1995). Assessments of adolescent language. Seminars in Speech and Language, 16, 14—31.
39.
Wilkinson, L.C., & Milosky, L.M. (1987). School-age children's metapragmatic knowledge of requests and responses in the classroom. Topics in Language Disorders, 7, 61—70.
