Street Smart: Developing Relationships to Support Walkable Communities for All

Abstract

Background. Physical activity promotion is an essential intervention for the prevention of chronic disease by reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease, Type 2 diabetes, and certain types of cancers, as well as improving brain health. Previous approaches that emphasized physical fitness did not meet the needs of the larger population due to not incorporating integration of movement into daily life. Changes that result in the addition of even small amounts of physical activity, such as through active transportation, can make a big difference in quality of life and longevity. Innovative Approach. To increase opportunities for active transportation, Utah agencies are working across sectors to incorporate physical activity into routine, day-to-day activities that may help to address this challenging public health problem. Human-powered travel is a key component of community design supporting health and healthy behaviors. The Utah Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) built relationships with partners in order to promote active transportation. Lessons Learned & Recommendations. This article will demonstrate ways in which public health, transportation, and planning agencies can better engage to provide opportunities for all people to be physically active. DHHS addresses the importance of sharing public health data among state agencies, inclusion of under-represented populations in community feedback, and engaging in shared projects that will support the involvement of public health in transportation planning.

Keywords

active transportation collaboration community engagement physical activity chronic disease program infrastructure

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alession

H. M.

Bassett

D. R.

Bopp

M. J.

Parr

B. B.

Patch

G. S.

Rankin

J. W.

Rojas-Rueda

Roti

M. W.

Wojcik

J. R.

(2021). Climate change, air pollution, and physical inactivity: Is active transportation part of the solution? Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 53(6), 1170–1178. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000002569

Bronfenbrenner

(1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513

Carlson

S. A.

Adams

Yang

Fulton

(2018). Percentage of deaths associated with inadequate physical activity in the United States. Preventing Chronic Disease, 15, Article 170354. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd18.170354.

Franzini

Taylor

Elliott

M. N.

Cuccaro

Tortolero

S. R.

Gilliland

M. J.

Grunbaum

Schuster

M. A.

(2010). Neighborhood characteristics favorable to outdoor physical activity: Disparities by socioeconomic and racial/ethnic composition. Health & Place, 16(2), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.10.009

IBIS Public Health Indicator Based Information System. (2020). Utah small area information. https://ibis.health.utah.gov/ibisph-view/pdf/resource/UtahSmallAreaInfo.pdf

Lavinghouze

S. R.

Snyder

Rieker

P. P.

(2014). The component model of infrastructure: A practical approach to understanding public health program infrastructure. American Journal of Public Health, 104(8), e14–e24.

Norton

P. J.

(2011). Fighting traffic: The dawn of the motor age in the American city. MIT Press.

Perchoux

Kestens

Thomas

van Hulst

Thierry

Chaix

(2014). Assessing patterns of spatial behavior in health studies: Their socio-demographic determinants and associations with transportation modes (the RECORD Cohort Study). Social Science & Medicine, 119, 64–73.

Piercy

K. L.

Troiano

R. P.

(2018). Physical activity guidelines for Americans from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Cardiovascular benefits and recommendations. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 11(11), Article e005263. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005263

10.

Sallis

J. F.

Frank

L. D.

Saelens

B. E.

Kraft

M. K.

(2004). Active transportation and physical activity: Opportunities for collaboration on transportation and public health research. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 38(4), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2003.11.003

11.

Schmid

T. L.

Pratt

Witmer

(2006). A framework for physical activity policy research. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3(s1), S20–S29. https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jpah/3/s1/article-pS20.xml

12.

Smith

Hosking

Woodward

Witten

MacMillan

Field

Baas

Mackie

(2017). Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport: An update and new findings on health equity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14, Article 158. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0613-9

13.

Sulikova

Brand

(2021). Investigating what makes people walk or cycle using a socio-ecological approach in seven European cities. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 83, 351–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.10.008

14.

U.S. Census. (2022). American Community Survey S0802: Means of transportation to work by selected characteristics.

15.

Whitfield

G. P.

Paul

Wendel

A. M.

(2015). Active transportation surveillance–United States, 1999- 2012. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Surveillance Summaries, 64(7), 1–17.

16.

Rowangould

London

J. K.

Karner

(2019). Modeling health equity in active transportation planning. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 67, 528–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.01.011

17.

Young

D. R.

Cradock

A. L.

Eyler

A. A.

Fenton

Pedroso

Sallis

J. F.

Whitsel

L. P.

(2020). Creating built environments that expand active transportation and active living across the United States: A policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 142(11). https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000878