Perspectives From Extension Staff on Building and Sustaining Community Wellness Coalitions

Abstract

Background

Community wellness coalitions are an important part of functioning program infrastructure and have been effective in promoting policy, systems, and environmental (PSE) change, especially when paired with technical support by a community champion or Extension staff. PSE strategies are critical to support long-lasting behavior change but can be challenging to implement. Extension is an established and equipped organization that has potential to help community overcome those challenges. The aim of this article was to identify and describe experiences of Extension staff working as community coaches.

Methods

A mixed-methods design to assess the impact of Extension staff working with Community Champions included a quantitative Extension Coaching Confidence Scorecard and an Extension Key Informant Interview.

Results

The total Extension Coaching Confidence score significantly increased from pre- to post-intervention (55.1 ± 35.3 vs. 81.7 ± 37.7, p = .03). Five facilitators and two barriers to wellness coalition development were identified by Extension staff.

Discussion

The results of this study indicate that the model of community coaching used was effective at addressing the foundational components of the Component Model of Infrastructure (CMI). However, comprehensive training for Extension staff in the CMI and technical assistance are needed in order to build capacity, achieve outcomes, and promote sustainability.

Implications for Practice

Individuals seeking to transition to PSE work should be provided with a foundation of specific, targeted training in the CMI and evidence-based technical assistance methods. Practitioners should recognize the essential role of community champions in PSE work. Completing the Extension Coaching Confidence Scorecard periodically can inform evolving training needs.

Keywords

community coalitions community coaching Extension staff PSE community champions sustainability community intervention environmental and systems change rural health technical assistance component model of infrastructure program infrastructure community champion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agner

Pirkle

C. M.

Irvin

Maddock

J. E.

Buchthal

O. V.

Yamauchi

Starr

Sentell

(2020). The healthy Hawai‘i initiative: Insights from two decades of building a culture of health in a multicultural state. BMC Public Health, 20(1), Article 141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8078-1

Amobi

Plescia

Alexander-Scott

(2019). Community-Led initiatives: The key to healthy and resilient communities. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 25(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000999

Bronfenbrenner

(1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531.

Butterfoss

F. D.

(2004). The coalition technical assistance and training framework: Helping community coalitions help themselves. Health Promotion Practice, 5(2), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839903257262

Center for Scientific Collaboration and Community Engagement. (2021). The CSCCE community participation model—Exploring the Champion mode.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018, June 6). Centers for Disease Control and prevention division of nutrition, physical activity and obesity. High Obesity Program. https://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpao/state-local-programs/hop-1809/high-obesity-program-1809.html

Holston

Stroope

Cater

Kendall

Broyles

(2020). Implementing policy, systems, and environmental change through community coalitions and extension partnerships to address obesity in rural Louisiana. Preventing Chronic Disease, 17, 190284. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd17.190284

Kajamaa

Mattick

de la Croix

(2020). How to do mixed-methods research. Clinical Teacher, 17, 267–271.

Katz

Wandersman

(2016). Technical assistance to enhance prevention capacity: A research synthesis of the evidence base. Prevention Science, 17(4), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0636-5

10.

Lavinghouze

S. R.

Snyder

Rieker

P. P.

(2014). The component model of infrastructure: A practical approach to understanding public health program infrastructure. American Journal of Public Health, 104(8), e14–e24. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302033

11.

Murriel

A. L.

Kahin

Pejavara

O’Toole

(2020). The high obesity program: Overview of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and cooperative extension services efforts to address obesity. Preventing Chronic Disease, 17, 190235. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd17.190235

12.

National Opinion Research Center. (2011). Literature review: Developing a conceptual framework to assess the sustainability of community coalitions post-federal funding. https://aspe.hhs.gov/reports/literature-review-developing-conceptual-framework-assess-sustainability-community-coalitions-post

13.

Ruslin

Mashuri

Rasak

Alhabsyi

Syam

(2022). Semi-structured interview: A Methodological reflection on the development of a qualitative research instrument in educational studies. ISOR Journal of Research & Methods in Education, 12, 22–29.

14.

Stluka

Moore

Eicher-Miller

H. A.

Franzen-Castle

Henne

Mehrle

Remley

McCormack

(2018). Voices for food: Methodologies for implementing a multi-state community-based intervention in rural, high poverty communities. BMC Public Health, 18(1), Article 1055. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5957-9

15.

US Census Bureau. (2020). South Dakota: 2020 census.

16.

US Department of Agriculture. (n.d.). Policy, systems, and environmental change. SNAP Education Connection. https://snaped.fns.usda.gov/snap-ed-works/policy-systems-and-environmental-change

17.

US Department of Agriculture. (2020). FY 2020 Snap-Ed plan guidance—USDA. FY20 SNAP-Ed Plan Guidance.

18.

US Department of Agriculture. (2022, April). Extension. National Institute of Food and Agriculture. https://www.nifa.usda.gov/about-nifa/how-we-work/extension